An Imperial Presidency In The Making?

  • Share on Tumblr

by Chuck Baldwin

Yesterday, The Wall Street Journal carried a story entitled “Obama Steps Up Confrontation.” It said in part, “On Thursday, the president challenged Republicans who planned to campaign on repealing his health-care bill with, ‘Go for it.’ Two days later, he made 15 senior appointments without Senate consent, including a union lawyer whose nomination had been blocked by a filibuster.

“At a bill-signing event Tuesday, he is set to laud passage of higher-education legislation that was approved despite Republican objections through a parliamentary maneuver that neutralized the party’s filibuster threat.”

Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) called Obama’s decision to federalize most student loans “really brazen” and “the most underreported, biggest Washington takeover in history.”

See the WSJ report at:

http://tinyurl.com/wsj-obama-confronts

If history teaches us anything, it teaches us that power always craves more power. And there are only 2 ways to check power: internally, through self-discipline and humility; or externally, through equally determined and equipped counterforces.

Americans should thank God that George Washington was our first President, because no one exemplified self-discipline and humility more than he did. After having led the colonies to perhaps the most miraculous revolution in world history, Washington was universally adored and even idolized. There were many that even attempted to make Washington America’s king. He flatly refused this proposal, of course. (Compare Washington’s character and humility to former President G.W. Bush, who, on this subject, said, “If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I’m the dictator.”)

The concept of an American monarch may seem foreign to us today, but remember that a monarchy was the only form of government the colonists had ever known. And there can be no doubt that a monarchy (or some form of it) has been the single most popular form of central government that the nations of the world have utilized. But remember, too, the theme of America’s War for Independence was “No King But Jesus.” And no one believed that more than General George Washington did.

Like most of America’s founders, Washington distrusted government in general and despised big government in particular–even though people were willing to make him government’s imperial ruler. Listen to the Father of our Country:

“Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.”

Unfortunately, there hasn’t been a man of George Washington’s caliber in the White House for many a moon. Instead of distrusting and limiting the central government, the vast majority of modern Presidents have completely ignored the constitutional role of the Presidency, and have sought to expand the authority of the executive branch of the federal government to proportions never allowed in the Constitution or envisioned by its creators. And Barack Obama is following the example of his predecessors by continuing this malevolent model (with increased rapidity, I might add). The above-mentioned stories are just the latest examples of what is fast becoming an imperial Presidency. It seems that every day another example of executive arrogance and usurpation of power takes place.

Given the lack of genuine humility and character of America’s President–and the unwillingness of Congress and the Supreme Court to restrain his unconstitutional propensities–it is left to the states and the People to hold this would-be king in check.

And here is another reason to be thankful for America’s founders: they recognized the ultimate role of the states in safeguarding and protecting liberty. As James Madison said in Federalist 45, “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.”

In Federalist 39 Madison said, “Each State, in ratifying the Constitution, is considered as a sovereign body, independent of all others, and only to be bound by its own voluntary act. In this relation, then, the new Constitution will, if established, be a FEDERAL, and not a NATIONAL constitution.” (Emphasis in the original.)

If America’s founders desired that a national–or monarchal–government be established in the United States, what was the purpose of the original 13 colonies retaining individual statehood? Why would each State retain its authority as “a sovereign body,” if not to serve as a vanguard against the encroachment upon liberty by the central government?

And never has liberty been more vulnerable to oppression and tyranny than right now! Why? Because ever since 9/11, both political parties in Washington, D.C., have placed America in a state of perpetual war. This fact alone puts the federal government in a position to become America’s oppressor.

In the first place, the Congress of the United States (then controlled by Republicans) abdicated its constitutional obligation to be the sole determiner regarding America’s entrance into war by providing then-President Bush with virtually unlimited and unchecked ability to determine and wage war clearly outside the perimeter of constitutional authority. And since taking over the federal government last year, Democrats in Washington, D.C., have followed suit.

But listen to Madison: “The executive [President] has no right, in any case, to decide the question, whether there is or is not cause for declaring war.”

Furthermore, the condition of unending, perpetual war only serves the purpose of lessening liberty. To quote Madison again: “No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.” Madison also declared, “If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.” And one more from Madison: “The means of defense against foreign danger, have been always the instruments of tyranny at home.”

One needs to only look around to observe that Madison’s warnings are quickly becoming a reality in these United States.

What all this means is that the American people cannot rely on Washington, D.C., to control itself. We cannot trust Washington politicians and bureaucrats to have the character and self-discipline to honor the Constitution and defend our liberties. If we are to preserve our freedom in this country, it will be up to the body politic in each State to do it. If the Congress and Court in Washington, D.C., will not rein in this burgeoning monarchy at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, then the states and People must.

mcclanahan-founding-fathersAt this point, I do not believe there is any way to avoid it: a showdown between freedom-loving states and the federal government is inevitable. But not only is it inevitable, it is absolutely necessary! The central government in Washington, D.C., is quickly morphing into a monarchy–or at the very least an oligarchy. And neither the Donkeys nor the Elephants inside the Beltway are willing to do anything to stop it. Either the states determine to defend the rights and liberties of the American people now, or we are destined to be governed by DC’s despots. Furthermore, we cannot cede to the US Supreme Court–or to any other federal authority–our independence, and most certainly, those fundamental elements necessary to our very survival. Only the states and the People, respectively, can maintain these bulwarks.

The question is, Will my State raise the “Don’t Tread On Me” flag and sincerely defend my liberties? And the follow-up question is, If my State will not do it, which states will, and what will I do? We have little choice. Either we join with a State that will fight for our liberties and help procure freedom for our posterity, or we follow radical unionists (and globalists) into a modern-day monarchy that is marching America toward oppression and servitude.

*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link

(c) Chuck Baldwin

NOTE TO THE READER:

Chuck Baldwin is a syndicated columnist, radio broadcaster, author, and pastor dedicated to preserving the historic principles upon which America was founded. He was the 2008 Presidential candidate for the Constitution Party. He and his wife, Connie, have been married for 37 years and have 3 children and 7 grandchildren. See Chuck’s complete bio at:
http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?page_id=6

Please visit Chuck’s web site at http://chuckbaldwinlive.com

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?

,

13 comments
E D Stewart Jr
E D Stewart Jr

I am also from Virginia, just like jsmith above, and soundly support the 10th Amendment, along with the entire Bill of Rights.

A lot of people, MANY Virginians among them, do not know enough of their history to know that the current Virginia state flag is also her secession flag. After the War ended in 1865, Virginia was brought back into the Union at the point of a bayonet. Her rape and pillage by Scalawags and Carpetbaggers continued during Reconstruction from 1867 to 1877, and as typical for the Southern states, for many years beyond the end of Reconstruction. Politicians in Washington, DC developed an unconstitutional attitude beginning under Lincoln in 1861 which has continued to this day. It's time to put a stop to it!!!

fbob
fbob

Gene Healy, of the Cato Institute, has witten an excellent book and several scholaly articles on that subject, The Imperial Presidency,. There's no question any more that we have been creating such an institution. So much so that it appears that the only thing lacking is automatic succesion. The suspending of the two-term limit is not beyond imagination, given our current president's apparent admiration of Hugo Chavez and his support for the deposed Zelaya of Honduras, who tried to do that very thing.

How many states will it take to declare their Tenth Amendment rights and reverse this enire process?

Jsmith
Jsmith

Thank you for an excellent article. Luckily for me, my commonwealth has risen the flag and is resisting tyranny (sic semper tyrannis!). However, there are still more than 30 states that have not. Enough is enough.

It's time for Americans who believe in the Constitution to stand up and be counted. It's not enough to post something here. You need to contact your lawmakers and AGs and set them straight.

Pete
Pete

Chuck stated; "The question is, Will my State raise the “Don’t Tread On Me” flag and sincerely defend my liberties? A nice article by Chuck, but the question should be: WHAT WILL I DO TO SEE THAT MY STATE DOES RAISE THE “Don’t Tread On Me” flag and sincerely defend my liberties?".

Its up to us folks, as the saying goes: IFNOT US, WHO?, IFNOT NOW, WHEN?

Misty
Misty

Excellent! Great article! True and comprehensive!

Guest
Guest

Great article!

As Don said, there have been a long line of abuses. Consider that FDR would still be President if he were alive.

The article is, of course, NOT about Bush v. Obama. The commenter who read it that way is simply unable to read and comprehend English. (That commenter might be happier posting comments at the Daily Kos.)

Here are a couple of quotes from the article (for those who can't read and comprehend it in context) that make the point:

"[T]he vast majority of modern Presidents have completely ignored the constitutional role of the Presidency"

"Barack Obama is following the example of his predecessors by continuing this malevolent model"

For those who are not blinded by zealotry and know how to read, this article makes the fundamental point of the 10th amendment: All governmental power originates with the people. It will be up to the people to demand that government becomes more responsive and responsible. You cannot expect Washington to fix itself.

Sadly, this may well end up in a direct and overt power struggle between the States/People on one side and the federal government on the other. Most people don't want another War Between the States. Today's struggle, however, is not geographically based. It will be interesting to see how it plays out since the dissatisfaction with out-of-control government runs from coast to coast and north to south.

pmalter0
pmalter0

Don,

It is not an issue of being pro-Bush but rather one of remembering history. When I was in college and law school in the 60s, we all stood up and cheered the playing of "Dixie" at our football games. I did not then, nor do I now, view that as being racist or bigoted, but rather one of simply remembering and honoring our history.

Don
Don

I did not read Mr. Baldwins article as being pro-Bush. The problem has been a long line of Presidents that were power hungry, both dems and repubs. Along with the congress for over 100 years.

pmalter0
pmalter0

I don't know if this article is more ludicrous or pathetic. The "really brazen" "biggest Washington takeover in history" is Congress reducing the deficit by stopping the banks (remember these guys who recently tried to bring down the economy) from charging students higher interest than they pay to the government for these government guaranteed loans. Moreover, there is nothing cited that Obama and the Democrats have done that Bush and the Republicans didn't do. As far as creating an "imperial presidency," it was Bush, not Obama, who attempted to claim supreme powers under the "unitary executive" doctrine; it was Bush, not Obama,who exercised illegal imperial powers by invading a foreign country that did not attack or threatened to attack us; it was Bush, not Obama, who authorized torture -- a long time favorite of Imperial despots; it was Bush, not Obama, who expanded the concept of "executive privilege" to Imperial levels; it was Bush, not Obama, who trampled on the historical concepts of federalism and states rights by having citizens who attempted to comply with state laws arrested, ironically, it was Obama ordered his Justice Department to stop interfering in these states rights.

MichaelBoldin
MichaelBoldin

Bush was a criminal. the Tenth Amendment Center has been saying this for years, and Mr Baldwin has been doing so as well. Obama, the so-called peace candidate, just continues the crimes of the Bush administration and expands them. Just like Bush did with Clinton and Clinton did with Bush Sr. and the pattern continues....

So stop with the sniping and intentional distractions from the issues at hand before you comment here again.

Guest
Guest

I agree that this character "pmalter0" is intentionally trying to distract and, thus, should be ignored by those of us who are trying to have an intellectual debate in order to advance the cause of liberty.

Surely, no one can be this dense. It may be a sign that this site is getting influential enough that those who seek power and oppose liberty have decided to attempt to derail it.

Did the Founding Fathers have to put up with this? : )

Don
Don

I totally agree. But what will it take to get a state or states moving. All of my 69 years I have heard the old saying "THAT THE SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN". But there may be additional states join with the old south next time. My state of Oklahoma will have a very interesting election this year. Not only with the election of state officials but with state questions to change the Oklahoma Contitution. I hope other states get as involved as mine and try to take back our country.

Charlie
Charlie

Glad to see Chuck Baldwin on this site. I so appreciate him and the work of 10th AM Center. Keep up the great work guys!

Trackbacks

  1. Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by RonPaul_2012: An Imperial Presidency In The Making? http://bit.ly/bNNtku #tlot #tcot #RonPaul…

  2. [...] An Imperial Presidency In The Making? | Tenth Amendment Center [...]