<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Constitution Will Never Enforce Itself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/07/the-constitution-will-never-enforce-itself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/07/the-constitution-will-never-enforce-itself/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:57:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Bill of Rights Versus the US Constitution ~A TRUE History Lesson &#124; Just Piper</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/07/the-constitution-will-never-enforce-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-339177</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bill of Rights Versus the US Constitution ~A TRUE History Lesson &#124; Just Piper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4319#comment-339177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] canâ€™t, or wonâ€™t, do its job, then its time to give sovereignty back to the individual states.  Itâ€™s time to get the federal parasite off the backs of â€œwe the people,â€  and return to truly being, a â€œland of the free, and home of the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] canâ€™t, or wonâ€™t, do its job, then its time to give sovereignty back to the individual states.  Itâ€™s time to get the federal parasite off the backs of â€œwe the people,â€  and return to truly being, a â€œland of the free, and home of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: De jure</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/07/the-constitution-will-never-enforce-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-310816</link>
		<dc:creator>De jure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4319#comment-310816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Declare? How about are, unless terminated.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Declare? How about are, unless terminated.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escapee</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/07/the-constitution-will-never-enforce-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-303105</link>
		<dc:creator>Escapee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4319#comment-303105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now this is odd! There seem to be two different page styles served by this website. 
 
One page style has some posts censored, and shows &quot;thumbs-up&quot; and &quot;thumbs-down&quot; for each post. MarkAdamsJDMBA seems to have one consistent up-thumbing fan. 
 
The other page style does not display the &quot;thumbs&quot; and appears to be uncensored, with MarkAdamsJDMBA&#039;s more embarrassing posts left intact.  
 
At the moment, the redacted &quot;thumb&quot; page view is being displayed, which suggests that the sock-puppeting originates from the management of this board. 
 
 
 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is odd! There seem to be two different page styles served by this website. </p>
<p>One page style has some posts censored, and shows &quot;thumbs-up&quot; and &quot;thumbs-down&quot; for each post. MarkAdamsJDMBA seems to have one consistent up-thumbing fan. </p>
<p>The other page style does not display the &quot;thumbs&quot; and appears to be uncensored, with MarkAdamsJDMBA&#039;s more embarrassing posts left intact.  </p>
<p>At the moment, the redacted &quot;thumb&quot; page view is being displayed, which suggests that the sock-puppeting originates from the management of this board. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opey</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/07/the-constitution-will-never-enforce-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-302778</link>
		<dc:creator>Opey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4319#comment-302778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to express concern over the E.O. that Obama signed forming a &quot;Council of Governors&quot; creating the potential for coercing complicity by State Governors in the federalizing of domestic law enforcement.  I see it as Obama&#039;s attempt to circumvent the mounting tide of state affirmations of the 10th amendment safeguard against Federal incursion of unconstitutional powers.  When considered in the light of the RAND analysis that proposes a &#039;hybridization&#039; of domestic law enforcers with a military contingent of law-enforcement &#039;shapers&#039; while they are not deployed in foreign &#039;assignments,&#039; the structural framework for a Police State comes into focus.. 
 
I firmly believe that the State Legislatures should pass a law or amend their state constitutions that would specifically prohibit state Governors from engaging in any activity that would undermine state sovereignty as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, with an eye for the preservation of Posse Comitatus. 
 
WeThePeople need to throw up the necessary firewall update against the obvious subversive attempt by the Executive Branch to subdue State Sovereignty in order to transform this nation into a Socialist state in preparation for its ushering into a Socialist/Marxist World Government.  We need to strengthen state protection against the insidious reach of the United Nations. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;d like to express concern over the E.O. that Obama signed forming a &quot;Council of Governors&quot; creating the potential for coercing complicity by State Governors in the federalizing of domestic law enforcement.  I see it as Obama&#39;s attempt to circumvent the mounting tide of state affirmations of the 10th amendment safeguard against Federal incursion of unconstitutional powers.  When considered in the light of the RAND analysis that proposes a &#39;hybridization&#39; of domestic law enforcers with a military contingent of law-enforcement &#39;shapers&#39; while they are not deployed in foreign &#39;assignments,&#39; the structural framework for a Police State comes into focus.. </p>
<p>I firmly believe that the State Legislatures should pass a law or amend their state constitutions that would specifically prohibit state Governors from engaging in any activity that would undermine state sovereignty as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, with an eye for the preservation of Posse Comitatus. </p>
<p>WeThePeople need to throw up the necessary firewall update against the obvious subversive attempt by the Executive Branch to subdue State Sovereignty in order to transform this nation into a Socialist state in preparation for its ushering into a Socialist/Marxist World Government.  We need to strengthen state protection against the insidious reach of the United Nations. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escapee</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/07/the-constitution-will-never-enforce-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-302846</link>
		<dc:creator>Escapee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4319#comment-302846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The posts have been restored. Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The posts have been restored. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramon  Andres</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/07/the-constitution-will-never-enforce-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-302782</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramon  Andres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4319#comment-302782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to express concern over the E.O. that Obama signed forming a &quot;Council of Governors&quot; creating the potential for coercing complicity by State Governors in the federalizing of domestic law enforcement.  I see it as Obama&#039;s attempt to circumvent the mounting tide of state affirmations of the 10th amendment safeguard against Federal incursion of unconstitutional powers.  When considered in the light of the RAND analysis that proposes a &#039;hybridization&#039; of domestic law enforcers with a military contingent of law-enforcement &#039;shapers&#039; while they are not deployed in foreign &#039;assignments,&#039; the structural framework for a Police State comes into focus.. 
 
I firmly believe that the State Legislatures should pass a law or amend their state constitutions that would specifically prohibit state Governors from engaging in any activity that would undermine state sovereignty as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, with an eye for the preservation of Posse Comitatus. 
 
WeThePeople need to throw up the necessary firewall update against the obvious subversive attempt by the Executive Branch to subdue State Sovereignty in order to transform this nation into a Socialist state in preparation for its ushering into a Socialist/Marxist World Government.  We need to strengthen state protection against the insidious reach of the United Nations. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d like to express concern over the E.O. that Obama signed forming a &quot;Council of Governors&quot; creating the potential for coercing complicity by State Governors in the federalizing of domestic law enforcement.  I see it as Obama&#039;s attempt to circumvent the mounting tide of state affirmations of the 10th amendment safeguard against Federal incursion of unconstitutional powers.  When considered in the light of the RAND analysis that proposes a &#039;hybridization&#039; of domestic law enforcers with a military contingent of law-enforcement &#039;shapers&#039; while they are not deployed in foreign &#039;assignments,&#039; the structural framework for a Police State comes into focus.. </p>
<p>I firmly believe that the State Legislatures should pass a law or amend their state constitutions that would specifically prohibit state Governors from engaging in any activity that would undermine state sovereignty as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, with an eye for the preservation of Posse Comitatus. </p>
<p>WeThePeople need to throw up the necessary firewall update against the obvious subversive attempt by the Executive Branch to subdue State Sovereignty in order to transform this nation into a Socialist state in preparation for its ushering into a Socialist/Marxist World Government.  We need to strengthen state protection against the insidious reach of the United Nations. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opey</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/07/the-constitution-will-never-enforce-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-302780</link>
		<dc:creator>Opey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4319#comment-302780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Test post. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test post. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escapee</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/07/the-constitution-will-never-enforce-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-302360</link>
		<dc:creator>Escapee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4319#comment-302360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uh oh! I see that Mr. Adams and my posts have been taken down.  
 
If you would like me to take this forum seriously, please put them back up. 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh oh! I see that Mr. Adams and my posts have been taken down.  </p>
<p>If you would like me to take this forum seriously, please put them back up. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escapee</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/07/the-constitution-will-never-enforce-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-302234</link>
		<dc:creator>Escapee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4319#comment-302234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your question is how are &quot;we&quot; to control state and local government. Am I correct?

I would answer that &quot;we&quot; social engineering buffoons are not permitted to meddle in the state and local governments. Under the republican terms of the U.S. Constitution, Article 4, section 4, clauses 1 and 2 assure that the Citizens are to govern their state and local affairs as they see fit, just as before the federal government was established.

Don&#039;t like this answer? Then you have no choice but to answer mine: What authority was given to the federal government to control the states or their citizens?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your question is how are &#8220;we&#8221; to control state and local government. Am I correct?</p>
<p>I would answer that &#8220;we&#8221; social engineering buffoons are not permitted to meddle in the state and local governments. Under the republican terms of the U.S. Constitution, Article 4, section 4, clauses 1 and 2 assure that the Citizens are to govern their state and local affairs as they see fit, just as before the federal government was established.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t like this answer? Then you have no choice but to answer mine: What authority was given to the federal government to control the states or their citizens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A. Adams JD/MBA</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/07/the-constitution-will-never-enforce-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-302225</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark A. Adams JD/MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4319#comment-302225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey shill, you failed to answer my question just as I predicted.  You don&#039;t want anyone to know how the local, state, or national governments are supposed to be controlled, do you?   
 
Since you are such a CONstitutional scholar, did you miss Article IV?  What does Article IV &#167; 4 mean when it provides that the United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of government?   Oh, that&#8217;s right, you shills don&#8217;t want anyone to know what that means, do you?  That&#8217;s why the powers that be don&#8217;t teach it in schools.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey shill, you failed to answer my question just as I predicted.  You don&#039;t want anyone to know how the local, state, or national governments are supposed to be controlled, do you?   </p>
<p>Since you are such a CONstitutional scholar, did you miss Article IV?  What does Article IV &sect; 4 mean when it provides that the United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of government?   Oh, that&rsquo;s right, you shills don&rsquo;t want anyone to know what that means, do you?  That&rsquo;s why the powers that be don&rsquo;t teach it in schools.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
