Resist DC: A Step-by-Step Plan for Freedom

What most concerns me is the degree to which most states have become dependent on the Federal Government for financial aid. You can't say "mind your own business" to Washington, but then expect to keep getting funds for for your transportation systems, your education system, your social services, and the list goes on. I just don't know if people have thought it all out - what kind of increase in state & local taxes might result, etc.

Hi, If I read your USA Constitution then your President
only has the power to sign a law, or send it back
to Congress for review. The Congress has all the power to
make law, the President has no power to make laws. The
Congress can pass a law/bill send back by the president
with a 2/3rd majority then no signing is needed. Since
the USA presidents are attaching Objections (that they
call 'signing statements') before signing, the law has not
been signed but has been furnished with Objections, and the
Objections are signed. Hence these laws/bills have not
come into force, they are on the roll of the Congress for
review (right???). Hence it might be an idea to give
out a new USA Code of law, where all such bills/laws are
removed which are still on the roll of the Congress ? And
also physically send that list of bills/laws with Objections
to the Congress for review ?? (I'm from Holland, but it is
established that 'signing statements' are illegal, the USA president
even agreed to that in campaign (right?)). regards, good luck. By the way, maybe
you should learn from these things that you can not
rely on smaller area Governments to reign in the power
of the larger area Governments, just doesn't work that way.
Seek state sovereignty, disband the union, imho.

In NH , Rep Mike Rollo blocked a states rights bill called HCR6.. and he plans on doing it again.

Matt..Enjoyed reading your lititure Keep up the good work,But I have one question on my mind,why is it not getting out to the people that there is no such thing as income tax,that it has been Fraud and, Extortion aganist the people for years!! Not one dime of Federal Income Tax go`s into the U.S. Treasury,but go`s to the Federal Reserve Banks for there own use.This has been proven in court on serveral accounts.Joe Banister won his case Tom Cryer won his case,Vernice Kuglin won her case ect.Just by asking the I.R.S. TO SHOW THEM THE LAW!!! they could not do it.
Bill Benson won his case by proveing that the 16th Amendment had never been Ratified
We have not filed a tax form since 2002 and never will! yes they started billing us in the year 2008,But if they ever take me to court, I will state my case on SHOW ME THE LAW,as there is no LAW.My subjestion
is that every american citizan STOP FILING!
When the Fat Bureaucratas have to stop extorting money from the people they will have to to come down to our standard of living,and will stop alot of this Bull SHIT
there brain washing the people with.
Thank you Dean Jamison

Way to go Matt...I have been articulating to everyone I know we need to take action prior to the next election cycle. So much damage has been done already and we need to act now before its too late. I have been talking to people about their level of frustration reaching an alarming and dangerous anger...without a definitive plan we'll will end up fighting against each other...forming local militia groups have been the subject of much of the talk around here but your announcement is definitely a better way to resolve the current take over. let me know how I can help.

Can't wait to read your posts on passing a Constitutional Tender Act in every State!

http://www.ConstitutionalTender.com/

good plan, our group of patriots have been working with our local county commissioners and i now see how important it is to include our local sheriff, after all it is true the sheriff is the most powerfull person in the county especially in regards to the constitution.

I have recently spent some considerable time reading several state Constitutions, and I noticed that they all include (what seems to me) very well written bills of rights, upon which, if there should happen to be any particular wrongs perceived by those peoples of these states, they are enabled, with practicable abilities, to further address, WHEREAS in unrealistic opposition, is this United States Constitution, in which a mere minority of states can effectively make this same endeavor impossible.

I THINK ITS GREAT, LIMIT FEDRAL POWER IN THE STATES. I FEEL THIS THING THAT GOING ON NOW KINDA GOT STARTED WITH KENNEDY. WHILE PEOPLES RIGHTS WERE BEING ABUSED BY CERTAIN STATES THE FEDS STEPED IN AND SHOWED WHOS BOSS. (A GOOOD THING AT THE TIME, civil rights) BUT LIKE ANY THING ELSE ITS GONE WAY TO FAR .AND THE FEDS THINK ITS THEIR JOB TO DICTATE TO THE PEOPLE . SO LETS END THEIR TYRANNY, AND HOPE OUR STATES ON THEIR OWN WILL FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION AND THEREFORE HAVE NO NEED FOR FEDRAL INVOLEMENT.

Good job Matt. Transparency in government, not people. I like it. We know the 2nd Amendment keeps the other Amendments in place. Given that, in our U.S. Constitution and considering the 10th Amendment where as those 2nd Amendment rights are already guaranteed, why would individual states even need to address their own gun laws? As Ted Nugent says, "The second amendment IS my concealed carry permit!"

Another thing to look at is to abolish the dictorial executive orders at all levels of government. Their mere presence is a threat to our Constitution and liberty! The simple stroke of a pen once they are in place throws everything out the window.

It is not as if progressive socialist follow the law. Google "switch in time that saved nine"

I am for the 10th Amendment. The Federal Government has gotten way too big and the States cannot handle the burden. Something must be done to curtail the growth of the Federal government.

It is time to cut the federal government off. It is out of control. The power needs to put back in the hands of the states were locals can control their back yard. The states have always had the power but the problem is that too many people just don't care about the constition. The federal government will not let its power be taken away with out a fight. If the states invoke their 10th amendment rights and basicly say you don't have to do what the federal government says you have to do. Who is going to stick their neck out first and will your governer and represenitives go to bat for you. I'm sorry to say but most will not. We're screwed and the next thing thats going to be happining is we are all going to be bail out california. Then New york! Then its going to be one big world government bailing out the united states and our soverity will be gone along with our constitution.

This is what ever American is up against. If we don't cut off the federal government now they will continue to bury us more and more in debt. Untill we are reduced to a third world country like Venezuela. The American free spirit is going to have to come up roaring fast or all is lost and we will be Venezuela.

I like the idea behind the local sheriff getting notice but how about make it so that its impossible for the federal government to arrest anyone and whenever a federal law is being violated then only the state law enforcement official can make an arrest. This way the state government can choose not to enforce any law that it feels is unfair even if that law is found "constitutional" by the federal government. The state can simply not enforce it as a way to nullify the federal law.

Every state in this republic has its own Constitution that its own governments must properly recognize and dutifully defend.

Having police powers that you never need to enforce, is the best of all worlds.
God its good to be King.

I'm afraid this is not quite correct. While the federal government cannot be arbiter of the limits of its own powers, the same goes for the state governments-- which did not create the federal government; rather, the federal government was created by the PEOPLE of each state, in conventions which ratified the Consttution. Therefore, only the PEOPLE of a state can nullify a federal law.

Likewise, this requires recognizing that each state is a sovereign nation, by law-- and that the United States is NOT a sovereign nation, except by extension of the various individual sovereign member-states.

This requires some correction of American history, starting back with the War Between the States-- and recognizing Lincoln as a tyrant on a scale with Lenin, Hitler,or Hussein in terms of conquering sovereign states.
ONLY when the states are recognized individually as popularly sovereign nations, can the Constitution be enforced by by Nullification.

[youtube UlrDTNllmk8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlrDTNllmk8 youtube]

I like most of what you are doing. I also think we need to bring our senators and reps home to work from their offices in their states. With today's technology there is no need for the expenses to send them to Washington, plus the rarified air there addles their brains. Kept in the states would save us billions of dollars, make them more accessible to our people and less likely to be influenced by radicals and special interest groups. Perhaps the thinking of their voters would be more influential in their states and they might be more interested in state sovereignty if they actually were here all the time.

Looks like the state of Washington's house of representatives has a lot of work to do. I count that 7 of its 98 representatives have gone on record to support its attempt to pass a 10th Amendment Resolution.

I say, "Bring us Washington, and then, let's talk further." Shea, by the way, is one of those few who is on the right side over there.

Might I ask what good more legislation will do? The Tenth Amendment is already in place and very clear. Why not then just excercise the states rights that already exist? Whether or not additional legislation is written, real and physical action by the states and the people has to take place before any change will occur. Legislation without action is an excercise in futility. Since the Tenth Amendment is already in place, all that is necessary is for the states to refuse to comply with ANY federal law not consistent with constitutional written (not implied) mandate. It seems rather simple to me, but more legislation accomplises nothing more than political bantering and strutting.

Oh! Now I understand, Matthew Shea was simply referring to those state legislators, who had met within their own respective states this summer. Sorry, but I was confused.

Was the Declaration of Independence a document that should have been rescinded, before that greatest nation in the would had a chance to so its teeth.

This appears to be a measured and thoughtful plan, and I'm pleased to see it. I wonder, though, how much thought has been given to the possible range of federal responses to acts of nullification.

It seems to me that the federal government is not likely to suffer gladly challenges to its accumulated, de facto powers. Ad hoc federal court rulings, withdrawal of funding and the exercise of police powers are the first reactions I would expect. They might be supplemented by manipulated, extra-governmental activist violence and disruption.
Is it probable that organized, constitutional opposition to the federal government would be taken as insurgency and dealt with accordingly? I think it is.

Behind my remarks lies the belief that we are beyond (or very nearly so) the point where the norms of civil society and the rule of law can be relied upon to achieve the peacful resolution of disputes between the general government and the states (people). The "Sheriff First" part of the plan seems to anticipate my view as does the emergence and growth of the Oath Keepers.

If the Tenth Amendment strategy is to succeed, I think plans must be laid with the expectation of draconian measures by the federal government, and that careful coordination of actions and timing among states (preferably contiguous) is essential.

Recognition of the existence of great power and its potential for abuse must be factored into any challenge to it. That the challenge is issued lawfully and in good faith carries little weight.

December is one month out of the year I lay aside our country's problems and concentrate on the fact that my wife's birthday is coming up, the need to buy Christmas presents for about a dozen people is here, a couple parties to go to and host one myself.
So Merry Christmas 10th Amenders and a happy "throw the bums out in 2010" New Year y'll,

Seventeenth Amendment Position: This is YOUR Third KEY to FREEDOM.
Now, that you have restored your Citizenship status back to one of the 50 Countries of the Union, and regained your Constitutional Rights. You will need to demand that your Countries politicians, recall the popular elected State senators sent to washington d.c. and have your Country appoint new ones that will have only the Countries interests to consider. There by returning the governance back to a Republic form of government, from the currently corrupt Democracy form of government. http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
You say this is not possible, the seventeenth amendment says they are chosen by popular vote, I strongly argue against this notion. The seventeenth amendment reads:
The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures.When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.This amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.
NOWHERE, in this amendment, does it repeal the states RIGHT to choose its senators, I repeat, NOWHERE.
As was done with the 21st amendment, repealing the 18th amendment.
So the seventeenth amendment is in conflict with the Constitution and is null and void, the states must take the seventeenth amendment, as an advisory vote by the people, on who the people, would like to be senator to represent the state in Washington d.c. but the states can select the best candidates for the position to stand up for the states interests.
Article I - The Legislative Branch Section 3 - The Senate The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote. Immediately after they shall be assembled in Consequence of the first Election, they shall be divided as equally as may be into three Classes. The Seats of the Senators of the first Class shall be vacated at the Expiration of the second Year, of the second Class at the Expiration of the fourth Year, and of the third Class at the Expiration of the sixth Year, so that one third may be chosen every second Year;No person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.The Senate shall chuse their other Officers, and also a President pro tempore, in the absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the Office of President of the United States.The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.Amendment 18 - Liquor Abolished. Ratified 1/16/1919. Repealed by Amendment 21, 12/5/1933. History1. After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited.2. The Congress and the several States shall have concurrent power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.3. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of the several States, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the States by the Congress.Amendment 21 - Amendment 18 Repealed. Ratified 12/5/1933. History 1. The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.2. The transportation or importation into any State, Territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited.3. The article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by conventions in the several States, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the States by the Congress.
John Galt

After you have filed your correct elector registration with the county clerk
This is YOUR Second KEY to FREEDOM, and Yes, it is this simple.
Remember, always on all forms, you are a Citizen of one of the 50 Countries that makeup this Union (Citizen of Ohio without the state)
Not a US citizen(slave).
Sorry anyone born in Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia, any Territory, or possession of the United States.
You cannot use this form because you are a slave, and your Plantation Owner is The United States.(Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia, any Territory, or possession of the United States).
John Galt
215 Mesa Street
Any town, Ohio [zip]
Date 01/01/2008
Internal Revenue Service
Street Address
City, State [zip]
Dear Mr. Computer:
After further study of the Code.
This is my Statement.
I am not required to file a tax return and I am Exempt.
I was not born in the United States. (Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia, Federal areas, Territories, or possessions thereof)
I am not a US citizen. (Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia, any Territory, or possession of the United States).
I am not a citizen of the United States. (Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia, any Territory, or possession of the United States).
I am not a United States person.
I was born in Iowa. Not in a Territory of the United States.
I have lived in Ohio since January of 2008.
I am a Citizen of Ohio and America. I am an Ohioan and an American.
I do not currently nor have I ever lived in the United States. (Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia, any Territory, or possession of the United States).
Ohio is not a part of the United States. Federal areas inside Ohio are Territories of and a part of the United States.
I do not live in a Federal area, also known as in the State, or within the State, or a Territory of the United States.
I do not live in a State, or any geographical area that is a part of the United States. (Territories or possessions of Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia.)
I am not an officer or an employee of the United States.
I do not work, nor have I ever worked in a Federal area.
Definitions from USCS:
26 USC Sec. 7701 (a)
(9) United States - The term “United States” when used in a geographical sense includes only the States (any Territory or possession of the United States) and the District of Columbia.
(10) State - The term “State” shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.
(30) United States person. The term ‘United States person means-
(A) a citizen or resident of the United States.
(B) a domestic partnership.
(C) a domestic corporation, and
(D) any estate or trust (other than a foreign estate or foreign trust, within the meaning of section 7701(a)(31)).
THE STATES 4 USCS Sec. 110
Sec. 110. Same; definitions
As used in sections 105-109 of this title-
(d) The term “State” includes any Territory or possession of the United States.
(e) The term “Federal area” means any lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department, establishment, or agency of the United States; and any Federal area, or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries of any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within such State.
Supreme Court decisions for the States 4 USCS Sec. 105 - Interpretive Notes And Decisions
1. IN GENERAL
2. Purpose
Purpose of Buck Act {4 USCS Sec. 105 et seq.} was to equalize liability for income tax between officers and employees of United States who reside within federal areas and those officers and employees, otherwise identically situated, who reside outside federal areas who had become liable for state tax by passage of Public Salary Tax Act 1939 {Act of April 12, 1939, Ch 59, 53 Stat 574}. United States v Lewisberg Area School Dist. (1976, CA3 Pa) 539 F2d 301.
28 USC Sec. 1746 : Unsworn Declarations Under Penalty of Perjury.
(1) If executed without the United States: “I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the united States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.” Executed on (date). (Signature)
(2) If executed within the United States, its territories, possessions, or commonwealths: I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.” Executed on (date). (Signature)
Since I was not born, and have never lived, nor have I ever worked in the United States. (Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia, any Territory, or possession of the United States).
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the united states of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on 01-01-2008.
All Rights Reserved
Sincerely,
John Galt

After you have filed your correct elector registration with the county clerk
This is YOUR Second KEY to FREEDOM, and Yes, it is this simple.
Remember, always on all forms, you are a Citizen of one of the 50 Countries that makeup this Union (Citizen of Ohio without the state)
Not a US citizen(slave).
Sorry anyone born in Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia, any Territory, or possession of the United States.
You cannot use this form because you are a slave, and your Plantation Owner is The United States.(Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia, any Territory, or possession of the United States).
John Galt
215 Mesa Street
Any town, Ohio [zip]
Date 01/01/2008
Internal Revenue Service
Street Address
City, State [zip]
Dear Mr. Computer:
After further study of the Code.
This is my Statement.
I am not required to file a tax return and I am Exempt.
I was not born in the United States. (Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia, Federal areas, Territories, or possessions thereof)
I am not a US citizen. (Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia, any Territory, or possession of the United States).
I am not a citizen of the United States. (Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia, any Territory, or possession of the United States).
I am not a United States person.
I was born in Iowa. Not in a Territory of the United States.
I have lived in Ohio since January of 2008.
I am a Citizen of Ohio and America. I am an Ohioan and an American.
I do not currently nor have I ever lived in the United States. (Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia, any Territory, or possession of the United States).
Ohio is not a part of the United States. Federal areas inside Ohio are Territories of and a part of the United States.
I do not live in a Federal area, also known as in the State, or within the State, or a Territory of the United States.
I do not live in a State, or any geographical area that is a part of the United States. (Territories or possessions of Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia.)
I am not an officer or an employee of the United States.
I do not work, nor have I ever worked in a Federal area.
Definitions from USCS:
26 USC Sec. 7701 (a)
(9) United States - The term “United States” when used in a geographical sense includes only the States (any Territory or possession of the United States) and the District of Columbia.
(10) State - The term “State” shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.
(30) United States person. The term ‘United States person means-
(A) a citizen or resident of the United States.
(B) a domestic partnership.
(C) a domestic corporation, and
(D) any estate or trust (other than a foreign estate or foreign trust, within the meaning of section 7701(a)(31)).
THE STATES 4 USCS Sec. 110
Sec. 110. Same; definitions
As used in sections 105-109 of this title-
(d) The term “State” includes any Territory or possession of the United States.
(e) The term “Federal area” means any lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department, establishment, or agency of the United States; and any Federal area, or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries of any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within such State.
Supreme Court decisions for the States 4 USCS Sec. 105 - Interpretive Notes And Decisions
1. IN GENERAL
2. Purpose
Purpose of Buck Act {4 USCS Sec. 105 et seq.} was to equalize liability for income tax between officers and employees of United States who reside within federal areas and those officers and employees, otherwise identically situated, who reside outside federal areas who had become liable for state tax by passage of Public Salary Tax Act 1939 {Act of April 12, 1939, Ch 59, 53 Stat 574}. United States v Lewisberg Area School Dist. (1976, CA3 Pa) 539 F2d 301.
28 USC Sec. 1746 : Unsworn Declarations Under Penalty of Perjury.
(1) If executed without the United States: “I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the united States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.” Executed on (date). (Signature)
(2) If executed within the United States, its territories, possessions, or commonwealths: I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.” Executed on (date). (Signature)
Since I was not born, and have never lived, nor have I ever worked in the United States. (Washington D.C. - The District of Columbia, any Territory, or possession of the United States).
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the united states of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on 01-01-2008.
All Rights Reserved
Sincerely,
John Galt

US citizens are the slave property of washington d.c.
The Road to a Peaceful Revolution
People have been lied to their whole lives, starting with their parents (who were lied to), then by government run schools, and finally the government on many levels, specifically on the subject of your Citizenship status. By understanding the TRUTH, how you voluntarily signed up to be a citizen of The District of Columbia (US citizen) without your informed consent. You lost your true Citizenship status as a Free Citizen of one of the 50 countries that make up this Union, to voluntarily accept to be a slave citizen of washington d.c.
By correcting this grave error and restoring your Free Citizen Status, you will restore all of your Constitutional Rights and deprive washington d.c. of a majority of its misplaced power/control over you, without a single shot fired.
Without further ado:
Ponder This
If you were the government, would you provide the keys to freedom or to enslavement?
Somewhere I read, that the supreme court ruled, that it is not the governments job to teach you as a juror your rights and responsibilities, as to judging the law as well as the subject on trial. This would also mean that you are responsible to know your correct Citizen/citizen slave status. The Truth will set you Free. This is YOUR first KEY to FREEDOM, 1 of only 3 keys required. Please read this very carefully, I have read a lot about the freedom movement, and there is one glaring flaw in all of it. You voluntarily give up your God given Sovereign Citizenship status under This Constitution for The united states of America, for a second rate 14th amendment US citizen, slave citizenship of washington d.c. (us citizen/citizen of the united states, first defined in the constitution at that point in time of the 14th amendment) when you register to vote, or sign any government documents.
Can someone prove this as being incorrect, when you sign all government provided forms, voter registration, jury summons, etc. you are voluntarily Swearing under oath, That you live in the District of Columbia, or one of its subdivisions, and want to be treated as a corporate slave with NO Constitutional Rights as a corporate citizen? And also that the Social Security Number is the nexus, that makes you that slave in the corporate matrix? That is why the income tax is legal in washington d.c. and its subdivisions and US citizens are required to pay it. US citizens have no constitutional rights. (look it up you’ll be floored.)
This is the correct Elector Registration Form for a Citizen of one of the 50 Countries of the Union (Not Washington D.C.) the definition of united states has been corrupted by the supreme court which gave it 3 definitions, the definition of state has been corrupted by congress to mean washington d.c. This will return your Citizenship Status back to where it rightfully is-was, before the 14th amendment.
Your County Clerk and Recorder
Street Domicile
Any town, Ohio [zip]
01/01/2008
John Galt
215 Mesa Street
Any town, Ohio [zip]
Elector Registration-notice of changes
Nativity-natural live birth, 01/01/0000 in Anytown, Anycounty, Iowa. Not in a Territory or possession of the United States.
I have lived in Ohio since January of 2008.
I have lived at my present domicile 215 Mesa Street, Anytown, Anycounty, in Ohio, since January of 2008.
I am a Citizen of Ohio and America. I am an Ohioan and an American.
I am a Free Man/Woman.
Party Enrollment – Unaffiliated.
Remove the Social Security Number from the registration card. The Social Security Number is the Property of the Social Security Administration and I DO NOT own it. And therefore it is not mine to give out.
I was not born in the United States. (Washington D.C. – The District of Columbia, Federal areas, Territories, or possessions thereof)
I am not a citizen of the United States (Washington D.C. – The District of Columbia, any Territory or possession of the United States).
I am not a United States person.
I am not a corporate person, corporate citizen, or corporate individual.
I do not currently have a residence nor have I ever resided in the United States. (Washington D.C. – The District of Columbia, Federal areas, Territories, or possessions thereof)
Ohio is not a part of the United States. Federal areas inside Ohio are Territories of and a part of the United States.
I do not live in a Federal area, also known as in the State, or within the State, or a Territory of the United States.
I do not live in a State, or any geographical area that is a part of the United States. (Territories or possessions of Washington D.C. – The District of Columbia.)
Definitions from USCS:
26 USC Sec. 7701 (a)
(9) United States – The term “United States” when used in a geographical sense includes only the States (any Territory or possession of the United States) and the District of Columbia.
(10) State – The term “State” shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.
(30) United States person. The term ‘United States person’ means-
(A) a citizen or resident of the United States.
(B) a domestic partnership.
(C) a domestic corporation, and
(D) any estate or trust (other than a foreign estate or foreign trust, within the meaning of section 7701(a)(31)).
THE STATES 4 USCS Sec. 110
As used in sections 105-109 of this title-
(d) The term “State” includes any Territory or possession of the United States.
(e) The term “Federal area” means any lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department, establishment, or agency of the United States; and any Federal area, or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries of any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within such State. (Inside the outer boundaries of, but not a part of, the 50 countries of the Union)
28 USC Sec. 1746: Unsworn Declarations Under Penalty of Perjury.
(1) If executed without the United States: “I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the united states of America that the foregoing is true and correct.” Executed on (date). (Signature)
(2) If executed within the United States, its territories, possessions, or commonwealths: I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.” Executed on (date). (Signature)
Since I was not born, and do not live, or work in the United States. (Washington D.C. – The District of Columbia, Federal areas, Territories, or possessions thereof)
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of Ohio and under the Constitution for The united states of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on 01-01-2008.
All Rights Reserved
Sincerely,
John Galt
PS. On all contracts, Voter/Elector Registration, Drivers License, Mortgage, Marriage License, Employment, Traffic Tickets, Bank Account, Rental, that you put your signature on, first thing to do, is write above where you will sign- All Rights Reserved –this throws the contract that it is written under, the UCC Code -UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE, that all CORPORATIONS operate under, back into common law. This will protect your Constitutional Rights. This will move you one-step higher above/over the corporate matrix, and back to being the Master over the corporate matrix, instead of being a slave under the corporate matrix. Then change the Unsworn Declarations Under Penalty of Perjury - statement to signify without the united states.
PPS. I have this on file with the county clerks office and I elect the least offensive lying scumbag that I can. PPPS. It is both funny and irritating at the same time, for it seems that I am not in the county/state corporate government computers, and other odd happenings (all Good) when dealing with the government.

US citizens are the slave property of washington d.c.
The Road to a Peaceful Revolution
People have been lied to their whole lives, starting with their parents (who were lied to), then by government run schools, and finally the government on many levels, specifically on the subject of your Citizenship status. By understanding the TRUTH, how you voluntarily signed up to be a citizen of The District of Columbia (US citizen) without your informed consent. You lost your true Citizenship status as a Free Citizen of one of the 50 countries that make up this Union, to voluntarily accept to be a slave citizen of washington d.c.
By correcting this grave error and restoring your Free Citizen Status, you will restore all of your Constitutional Rights and deprive washington d.c. of a majority of its misplaced power/control over you, without a single shot fired.
Without further ado:
Ponder This
If you were the government, would you provide the keys to freedom or to enslavement?
Somewhere I read, that the supreme court ruled, that it is not the governments job to teach you as a juror your rights and responsibilities, as to judging the law as well as the subject on trial. This would also mean that you are responsible to know your correct Citizen/citizen slave status. The Truth will set you Free. This is YOUR first KEY to FREEDOM, 1 of only 3 keys required. Please read this very carefully, I have read a lot about the freedom movement, and there is one glaring flaw in all of it. You voluntarily give up your God given Sovereign Citizenship status under This Constitution for The united states of America, for a second rate 14th amendment US citizen, slave citizenship of washington d.c. (us citizen/citizen of the united states, first defined in the constitution at that point in time of the 14th amendment) when you register to vote, or sign any government documents.
Can someone prove this as being incorrect, when you sign all government provided forms, voter registration, jury summons, etc. you are voluntarily Swearing under oath, That you live in the District of Columbia, or one of its subdivisions, and want to be treated as a corporate slave with NO Constitutional Rights as a corporate citizen? And also that the Social Security Number is the nexus, that makes you that slave in the corporate matrix? That is why the income tax is legal in washington d.c. and its subdivisions and US citizens are required to pay it. US citizens have no constitutional rights. (look it up you’ll be floored.)
This is the correct Elector Registration Form for a Citizen of one of the 50 Countries of the Union (Not Washington D.C.) the definition of united states has been corrupted by the supreme court which gave it 3 definitions, the definition of state has been corrupted by congress to mean washington d.c. This will return your Citizenship Status back to where it rightfully is-was, before the 14th amendment.
Your County Clerk and Recorder
Street Domicile
Any town, Ohio [zip]
01/01/2008
John Galt
215 Mesa Street
Any town, Ohio [zip]
Elector Registration-notice of changes
Nativity-natural live birth, 01/01/0000 in Anytown, Anycounty, Iowa. Not in a Territory or possession of the United States.
I have lived in Ohio since January of 2008.
I have lived at my present domicile 215 Mesa Street, Anytown, Anycounty, in Ohio, since January of 2008.
I am a Citizen of Ohio and America. I am an Ohioan and an American.
I am a Free Man/Woman.
Party Enrollment – Unaffiliated.
Remove the Social Security Number from the registration card. The Social Security Number is the Property of the Social Security Administration and I DO NOT own it. And therefore it is not mine to give out.
I was not born in the United States. (Washington D.C. – The District of Columbia, Federal areas, Territories, or possessions thereof)
I am not a citizen of the United States (Washington D.C. – The District of Columbia, any Territory or possession of the United States).
I am not a United States person.
I am not a corporate person, corporate citizen, or corporate individual.
I do not currently have a residence nor have I ever resided in the United States. (Washington D.C. – The District of Columbia, Federal areas, Territories, or possessions thereof)
Ohio is not a part of the United States. Federal areas inside Ohio are Territories of and a part of the United States.
I do not live in a Federal area, also known as in the State, or within the State, or a Territory of the United States.
I do not live in a State, or any geographical area that is a part of the United States. (Territories or possessions of Washington D.C. – The District of Columbia.)
Definitions from USCS:
26 USC Sec. 7701 (a)
(9) United States – The term “United States” when used in a geographical sense includes only the States (any Territory or possession of the United States) and the District of Columbia.
(10) State – The term “State” shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.
(30) United States person. The term ‘United States person’ means-
(A) a citizen or resident of the United States.
(B) a domestic partnership.
(C) a domestic corporation, and
(D) any estate or trust (other than a foreign estate or foreign trust, within the meaning of section 7701(a)(31)).
THE STATES 4 USCS Sec. 110
As used in sections 105-109 of this title-
(d) The term “State” includes any Territory or possession of the United States.
(e) The term “Federal area” means any lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department, establishment, or agency of the United States; and any Federal area, or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries of any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within such State. (Inside the outer boundaries of, but not a part of, the 50 countries of the Union)
28 USC Sec. 1746: Unsworn Declarations Under Penalty of Perjury.
(1) If executed without the United States: “I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the united states of America that the foregoing is true and correct.” Executed on (date). (Signature)
(2) If executed within the United States, its territories, possessions, or commonwealths: I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.” Executed on (date). (Signature)
Since I was not born, and do not live, or work in the United States. (Washington D.C. – The District of Columbia, Federal areas, Territories, or possessions thereof)
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of Ohio and under the Constitution for The united states of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on 01-01-2008.
All Rights Reserved
Sincerely,
John Galt
PS. On all contracts, Voter/Elector Registration, Drivers License, Mortgage, Marriage License, Employment, Traffic Tickets, Bank Account, Rental, that you put your signature on, first thing to do, is write above where you will sign- All Rights Reserved –this throws the contract that it is written under, the UCC Code -UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE, that all CORPORATIONS operate under, back into common law. This will protect your Constitutional Rights. This will move you one-step higher above/over the corporate matrix, and back to being the Master over the corporate matrix, instead of being a slave under the corporate matrix. Then change the Unsworn Declarations Under Penalty of Perjury - statement to signify without the united states.
PPS. I have this on file with the county clerks office and I elect the least offensive lying scumbag that I can. PPPS. It is both funny and irritating at the same time, for it seems that I am not in the county/state corporate government computers, and other odd happenings (all Good) when dealing with the government.

Maybe I just missed it, but this is the first time that I have read about legislators from several states meeting this summer to specifically address the steps needed to restore our Constitutional republic.

This to me is very encouraging, however, I do have two questions that maybe someone here can answer, who were these legislators, and where was this gathering held.

By the way, Jack, note that state-level nullification applies regardless of which party is running D.C. These are timeless principles.

It's good to hear that Ray signed; I knew he was an ideal person for the pledge.

This is what happens when the the separation of power between the States and their federal government is ignored.

Press Release from the Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Pelosi declares the power of Congress to regulate health care is essentially unlimited.

"Reform opponents continue to spread myths about components of America’s Affordable Health Choices Act, including the nonsensical claim that the federal government has no constitutionally valid role in reforming our health care system—apparently ignoring the validity of Medicare and other popular federal health reforms.

MYTH:"Health insurance reform could be unconstitutional…or violate the 10th amendment."

FACT: As with Medicare and Medicaid, the federal government has the Constitutional power to reform our health care system.

The 10th amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that the powers not delegated to the federal government by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states … or to the people. But the Constitution gives Congress broad power to regulate activities that have an effect on interstate commerce. Congress has used this authority to regulate many aspects of American life, from labor relations to education to health care to agricultural production. Since virtually every aspect of the heath care system has an effect on interstate commerce, the power of Congress to regulate health care is essentially unlimited.

The 10th amendment does not authorize states to constrict Congress’ power under the commerce clause. As the Supreme Court has held, Congress can bar racial discrimination in Ollie’s Barbeque in Alabama (Katzenbach v. McClung) or the growing and sale of medical marijuana in California (Gonzales v. Raich), even in the face of state laws permitting such behavior.

The 10th amendment does place one significant limit on Congress and the federal government: Congress cannot “commandeer” state officials to administer programs. It must get the consent of state officials who are asked, e.g., to run health programs for the poor or to help build highways. Typically, Congress obtains that consent by providing financial support to the states. A state is free to refuse the support and refuse to assist the federal government in administering the program, but Congress can authorize the federal government to administer the program on its own. Thus, Congress cannot force a state to administer a health insurance exchange, but it can authorize the federal government to administer such an exchange in any state that declines to do so.

One of the myth’s most highly visible proponents has now "backed away from earlier statements" here in an interview with ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos:

STEPHANOPOULOS: So just to be clear, are you suggesting that any parts of the plan as the President has laid it out are unconstitutional?

Gov. PAWLENTY (R-Minnesota): Well, I wouldn't go so far as to say it's a legal issue. I was raising it as much as a practical matter, that there are some things that the federal government shouldn't do, doesn't do well, and should leave to the states."

On the shared responsibility requirement in the House health insurance reform bill, which operates like auto insurance in most states, individuals must either purchase coverage (and non-exempt employers must purchase coverage for their workers)—or pay a modest penalty for not doing so. The bill uses the tax code to provide a strong incentive for Americans to have insurance coverage and not pass their emergency health costs onto other Americans—but it allows them a way to pay their way out of that obligation. There is no constitutional problem with these provisions."

End

http://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/factcheck?id=0107

You are, of course, entitled to your opinion, but this is not a liberal or conservative issue -- it is a question of rights granted to the individual states versus the over-reach of federal authority. The rights and responsibilities of the general (federal) government are very narrowly defined, while the rights and responsibilities of the states are broadly inclusive. It is safe to say that no other President in the history of the Republic has come close to the kind of power grab we're seeing from the Obama administration. History may very well dub him "Barack the Usurper."

How many states must participate to make this effective? Obviously not all will. States in the east, especially northeast, are far too liberal and addicted to 'big government' to support this. Forget California for obvious reasons. So if only 1/2 - 2/3 of the states can pass this type of legislation, how effective will this be?

correct, very well thought out, i stand behind this plan and will do whatever necessary to see it through in the district in which i reside.

We do too, Nick! A lot of similarities here. And FYI - Ray McBerry just signed on to our 10-4 Pledge for the Constitution - as did Rep Shea some time ago.

I also like Ray McBerry's plan: http://www.georgiafirst.org/governor/sra.shtml

Everyone who has read the Supreme Court decisions concerning the 16th Amendment (Brushaber v. Union Pacific, Stanton v. Baltic Mining, Eisner v. Macomber, Peck & Co. v. Lowe, etc.) has latched onto a mere snippet of the Court's decisions - the government always had the power to tax income. The rest of the Court's decisions state that no new taxing power was granted to the government - no new or excepted subjects. See more concerning the Supreme Court decisions at http://wp.me/pCW6e-3a of my Blog.

Therefore, if no new power of taxing was granted to the government and the government always had the power to tax income, then the revenue being generated for the government from an income tax must come from one of the original commerce jurisdictions of the federal government - foreign commerce, interstate commerce, and Indian commerce. The three commerce jurisdictions are found in title 28, "Judiciary and judicial procedure", chapter 85, "District courts; jurisdiction" cited separately. Section 1336, "Surface Board Transportation orders", renamed from "Interstate Commerce Commission's orders" in 1995, is the interstate commerce jurisdiction. Section 1362, "Indian tribes", is obviously Indian commerce jurisdiction. Section 1340, "Internal revenue; customs duties", is foreign commerce jurisdiction.

"Internal revenue" is a special part of the Customs. Customs gains revenue from the collection of duties on importing from foreign countries. Internal revenue gains revenue from the collection of duties on importing from U.S. possessions - thus it is a source of "internal revenue". See more at http://wp.me/pCW6e-3Z of my Blog.

The income tax was originated within an Act of Congress approved on August 5, 1861, and it only applies to assessors and collectors of internal duties. See more at http://wp.me/pCW6e-4A of my Blog.

Applying for a Social Security number is the basis of all of America's problems. An applicant for Social Security became a federal employee - only federal employees pay federal employment taxes. The definition of "taxpayer" is a member of the Merchant Marine, a federal employee. A member of the Merchant Marine is engaged in foreign commerce. FICA is a U.S. possession tax (title 26 U.S.C. Section 7655).
By applying for a Social Security number an American has given away all sovereignty and become a slave for the federal government. Actually a slave for the international counterfeiters (the Federal Reserve) since the federal government went bankrupt in 1933. Title 11 U.S.C., "Bankruptcy", is implemented by title 11 C.F.R., "Federal elections". We are simply electing a bankruptcy "administration" at election time. See more on my Blog at LLSTULER.wordpress.com.

I am now involved in the most important federal tax case in the history of this country. It took me over 8 years to discover what I am now exposing to the public.
There is a lot of commentary going on now about the federal government socializing health care. This country became Socialist in 1933 through 1939 when all of the "New Deal" programs were initiated. Social Security made everyone a federal employee subject to a host of socialist agencies, such as the EPA, the FDA, the FTC, the FCC, the SEC, the IRS, the Dept of Education, etc.
Socialism has many forms; Communism, Fascism, Nazism, Social democracy, etc. It all comes down to a simple point - initiatory force by the government based on some supposed higher good. All initiatory force is criminal. The Declaration of Independence stated that "all men are created equal" (and, of course, women), so no man or group of men may initiate force against another man or group of men, including government. Our government should only be a defensive force - a source of justice for someone as a victim after a perpetrator initiated force or fraud against that victim. Our government and its owners, the Federal Reserve, are quite aware of the sovereignty of the individual American and so have created the Social Security scam in order to gain control over all Americans.