Someone who can probably provide good insight would be Yuri Maltsev over at the Mises institute…

We all know the USSR fell apart, and we sort-of know why, but we really don’t know much about how it did so as orderly as it did.

That’s not to say we want to go the same route. More importantly, some major events occurred there that might be good for us to know so that we might make progress toward a somewhat different end, but still, away from heavy centralization.

Our State Governments should be inclined to do so if we push them, they could even coheres other more “liberal” states into going along with it using the same tactics that our enemy’s have used on the same liberals so successfully to get concession out of them.

States need to work together so when they take out certainty federal laws and do what ever they do it in mass thus denying congress the piratical option of financial retaliation less congress as a whole pays the price.

The 2nd thing we need to look at is a way for the States to forcefully rout all Federal tax dollars thou the State, so that in the event of future usurpation thou the old form of extrotion on which the Federal goverment has effectily userped the rights of the people and their states.
The States may respond to such unconditional usurpation in effective nullification, by means of taxation deduction.

As the creator and empowers of the United States Federal government the power to define its meaning with regard to what rights and powers we ceded to the United States federal government Must by nature of the order of authority be definable by each individual state, for if it were not then the Union we joined would be equivalent to a black check of power subjecting us to perpetual and unmitigated tyranny.

As our founding fathers insisted in the Declaration of independents no such condition of perpetual and unconditional servitude can be entered into. To that end the only acceptable and reasonable explanation of the nature of federal power is that it’s definition of the extent of federal rights with respect to ourselves must therefore be derided by each individual member there to if there does not exist the unilateral right to withdraw from the same union at any time of each individual members choosing for themselves.

To say otherwise is to suggest that we have sold ourselves and all posterity into unconditional and perpetual slavery, subjecting ourselves to what amounts to an unmitigated tyranny.

If the federal goverment is to insist that such a condition of unconditional, unlimited, and perpetual servitude exist under their rule for all the States in union under it. Then such an insist being slave master over theses States will in itself indicate the arrogate and blind grab for absolute power of the same government indicative of a tyranny, thus demanding of we the state the overthrow and replacement of that tyranny by whatever means necessary.

However if that government is to acknowledge the limitations of its powers in such a way that the States are individual able to protect their peoples rights from unmitigated usurpation by the same government when they occur, then we may assume that there is an honest misunderstanding as to what rights and powers we voluntarily ceded to that federation in exchange for its benefits.

Under no circumstances can any government operating in the spirit of republicanism be premised to trap any members therein into a sittuation of unmitigated and unending servitude without redress.

We the freedom loving people and their state States as members of the United States are therefore obligated by the Constitutional law of the United States, as well as that of our most basic job as a Government of the United States to uphold that Constitutional law and protect the rights and liberty’s of our people. To that end we must uses any and all means at our disposal to nullify and resist any and all unconstitutional usurpation of the same rights and liberty of the people and their states by the central government of the United States.

So, one might question whether the federal gov’t could be challenged by the states, who could claim they should not be required to be the agents of the federal government for collection of federal taxes.

If even a few states would encourage and successfully protect such actions, many affluent people would be inclined to move to become a Citizen of that state.

The Federal government would rapidly take notice of this trend. They would take rapid notice of the INTENT to legislatively encourage such a trend. This wouldn’t be a resolution that lacks teeth. This would be a clear indication that the State intends to help people punch out the Federal government’s teeth.

You want to get anyone’s undivided attention you cut off their money supply.