<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Much More Will We Take?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/04/how-much-more-will-we-take/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/04/how-much-more-will-we-take/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Matthews</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/04/how-much-more-will-we-take/comment-page-2/#comment-257645</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2019#comment-257645</guid>
		<description>Michael.  Do I get into the TenthAmendmentCenter Hall of Fame for article with most comments?  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael.  Do I get into the TenthAmendmentCenter Hall of Fame for article with most comments?  <img src='http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Morris</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/04/how-much-more-will-we-take/comment-page-2/#comment-257616</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2019#comment-257616</guid>
		<description>Ha, ha!

Barack Hussein Obama, as I&#039;ve said before, is such an illegitimate, inexperienced fool, that he can have (even at this point) no earthly idea about what he&#039;s gotten himself into.  This is evidenced by the mere fact that virtually everything he involves himself in publicly is (rightly) taken as an affront to historical Americanism.  One would think that such an &quot;articulate&quot; figure would be smart enough to avoid the clearly hostile implications which his speeches invariably incorporate.  But, no, like I&#039;ve said from the gitgo, he&#039;s totally and completely oblivious to them.  What a useful idiot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, ha!</p>
<p>Barack Hussein Obama, as I&#8217;ve said before, is such an illegitimate, inexperienced fool, that he can have (even at this point) no earthly idea about what he&#8217;s gotten himself into.  This is evidenced by the mere fact that virtually everything he involves himself in publicly is (rightly) taken as an affront to historical Americanism.  One would think that such an &#8220;articulate&#8221; figure would be smart enough to avoid the clearly hostile implications which his speeches invariably incorporate.  But, no, like I&#8217;ve said from the gitgo, he&#8217;s totally and completely oblivious to them.  What a useful idiot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/04/how-much-more-will-we-take/comment-page-2/#comment-257612</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2019#comment-257612</guid>
		<description>The one worrisome thing about any idea of secession is that Obama may follow (his inspirational hero) Lincoln&#039;s lead and have a civil war on his hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one worrisome thing about any idea of secession is that Obama may follow (his inspirational hero) Lincoln&#8217;s lead and have a civil war on his hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Matthews - Houston, TX</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/04/how-much-more-will-we-take/comment-page-2/#comment-257609</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Matthews - Houston, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2019#comment-257609</guid>
		<description>I see it not as a matter of will everyone think what everyone else does is okay after a secession.  I highly doubt that.  We certainly don&#039;t agree with all that England or France does, but we get along with them just fine (for the most part).  

I see no problem existing that way and being the happier for it.

I would as soon see the Union stick together, but these clowns in D.C.... They are ruining it for all of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see it not as a matter of will everyone think what everyone else does is okay after a secession.  I highly doubt that.  We certainly don&#8217;t agree with all that England or France does, but we get along with them just fine (for the most part).  </p>
<p>I see no problem existing that way and being the happier for it.</p>
<p>I would as soon see the Union stick together, but these clowns in D.C&#8230;. They are ruining it for all of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Morris</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/04/how-much-more-will-we-take/comment-page-2/#comment-257601</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2019#comment-257601</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

Believe it or not I&#039;ve actually quoted that exact &lt;i&gt;Hotel California&lt;/i&gt; line myself (several times) in these same kinds of discussions.  

And don&#039;t get me wrong; I&#039;m not saying that a state seceding would &lt;i&gt;necessarily&lt;/i&gt; result in an &lt;i&gt;immediate&lt;/i&gt; aggressive counter-move by the national government (although that, to me, seems like the most likely scenario if some latitude is given to the term &quot;immediate, for the reasons I&#039;ve already listed and more.).  On the other hand, I can hardly envision a &quot;fractured&quot; America (an America that does not universally recognize a single central governing authority) that could live in mutual peace and harmony for very long.  So when I say that secession means civil war, I&#039;m saying that a fractured America, from the very moment that it fractures into different (independent) governing entities and onward, is an America whose exposure to internal disputes automatically increases exponentially.  Independent governing entities have, by nature and by necessity, authority to enter into treaties with other nations and states, coin money, provide for its own defense, declare war, and so forth and so on.  So in the end, it all boils down to internal disorder between the various governing entities, and &lt;i&gt;civil war&lt;/i&gt;.  At least that&#039;s the way I see it.  And let&#039;s face it, there&#039;s no love lost between certain states and certain others in this union.  But anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>Believe it or not I&#8217;ve actually quoted that exact <i>Hotel California</i> line myself (several times) in these same kinds of discussions.  </p>
<p>And don&#8217;t get me wrong; I&#8217;m not saying that a state seceding would <i>necessarily</i> result in an <i>immediate</i> aggressive counter-move by the national government (although that, to me, seems like the most likely scenario if some latitude is given to the term &#8220;immediate, for the reasons I&#8217;ve already listed and more.).  On the other hand, I can hardly envision a &#8220;fractured&#8221; America (an America that does not universally recognize a single central governing authority) that could live in mutual peace and harmony for very long.  So when I say that secession means civil war, I&#8217;m saying that a fractured America, from the very moment that it fractures into different (independent) governing entities and onward, is an America whose exposure to internal disputes automatically increases exponentially.  Independent governing entities have, by nature and by necessity, authority to enter into treaties with other nations and states, coin money, provide for its own defense, declare war, and so forth and so on.  So in the end, it all boils down to internal disorder between the various governing entities, and <i>civil war</i>.  At least that&#8217;s the way I see it.  And let&#8217;s face it, there&#8217;s no love lost between certain states and certain others in this union.  But anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Matthews</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/04/how-much-more-will-we-take/comment-page-2/#comment-257596</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2019#comment-257596</guid>
		<description>I see the issues you raise, Terry.  I imagine it is possible to manufacture a &quot;Fort Sumter&quot; scenario all over again.  

I find the whole scenario kind of eerie in a &quot;Hotel California&quot; sort-of way.   &quot;You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the issues you raise, Terry.  I imagine it is possible to manufacture a &#8220;Fort Sumter&#8221; scenario all over again.  </p>
<p>I find the whole scenario kind of eerie in a &#8220;Hotel California&#8221; sort-of way.   &#8220;You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Morris</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/04/how-much-more-will-we-take/comment-page-2/#comment-257595</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2019#comment-257595</guid>
		<description>&quot;I ca just see it now. After secession, the first 2 FAQâ€™s on the State of Texas website will be:

â€œDo I still need to send in a federal income tax return?â€

â€œWill I still get my federal income tax refund?â€&quot;

ROTFL!!

Or how about this one:  &quot;I am still a U.S. citizen, right?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I ca just see it now. After secession, the first 2 FAQâ€™s on the State of Texas website will be:</p>
<p>â€œDo I still need to send in a federal income tax return?â€</p>
<p>â€œWill I still get my federal income tax refund?â€&#8221;</p>
<p>ROTFL!!</p>
<p>Or how about this one:  &#8220;I am still a U.S. citizen, right?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Morris</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/04/how-much-more-will-we-take/comment-page-2/#comment-257594</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2019#comment-257594</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

A flyover state like Oklahoma (perceived by the general public to be populated by a bunch of ungovernable backwoods hillbillies) secedes.  Upwards of thirty percent of its citizens cry foul.  The U.S. government has an interest in that thirty percent because they are also U.S. citizens who disagree with Oklahoma&#039;s move to secession.  On top of everything else that group would be perceived as victims of an aggressive majority population whose rights would be threatened, and the U.S. government would be pressured (as if that would be necessary) to come to their rescue.  And on and on and on.

Now, you can say I&#039;m letting my imagination run away with me, but it doesn&#039;t make it so.  And you can&#039;t simply say &quot;not on your life,&quot; &quot;fat chance, it isn&#039;t going to happen.&quot;  That&#039;s a bit weak, don&#039;t ya think?  But what in God&#039;s name does the fed care about world perception on the subject of a seceding American state?  &#039;The World&#039; routinely puts down such movements.  So whose side do you think it would take?

I can imagine any number of scenarios involving secession that would ultimately result in bloodshed, but I can&#039;t imagine a single scenario that would not.  Nonetheless...

I&#039;m content to leave it at that.  We&#039;ll undoubtedly see eventually because a state will definitely cross over that rubicon at some point in the not too distant future.  And I imagine that others will soon follow.  Until then, it&#039;s all just speculation on our parts.  But I&#039;ll wager a cup of coffee on it if you like.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>A flyover state like Oklahoma (perceived by the general public to be populated by a bunch of ungovernable backwoods hillbillies) secedes.  Upwards of thirty percent of its citizens cry foul.  The U.S. government has an interest in that thirty percent because they are also U.S. citizens who disagree with Oklahoma&#8217;s move to secession.  On top of everything else that group would be perceived as victims of an aggressive majority population whose rights would be threatened, and the U.S. government would be pressured (as if that would be necessary) to come to their rescue.  And on and on and on.</p>
<p>Now, you can say I&#8217;m letting my imagination run away with me, but it doesn&#8217;t make it so.  And you can&#8217;t simply say &#8220;not on your life,&#8221; &#8220;fat chance, it isn&#8217;t going to happen.&#8221;  That&#8217;s a bit weak, don&#8217;t ya think?  But what in God&#8217;s name does the fed care about world perception on the subject of a seceding American state?  &#8216;The World&#8217; routinely puts down such movements.  So whose side do you think it would take?</p>
<p>I can imagine any number of scenarios involving secession that would ultimately result in bloodshed, but I can&#8217;t imagine a single scenario that would not.  Nonetheless&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m content to leave it at that.  We&#8217;ll undoubtedly see eventually because a state will definitely cross over that rubicon at some point in the not too distant future.  And I imagine that others will soon follow.  Until then, it&#8217;s all just speculation on our parts.  But I&#8217;ll wager a cup of coffee on it if you like.  <img src='http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Matthews</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/04/how-much-more-will-we-take/comment-page-2/#comment-257593</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 01:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2019#comment-257593</guid>
		<description>I ca just see it now.  After secession, the first 2 FAQ&#039;s on the State of Texas website will be:

&quot;Do I still need to send in a federal income tax return?&quot;

&quot;Will I still get my federal income tax refund?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ca just see it now.  After secession, the first 2 FAQ&#8217;s on the State of Texas website will be:</p>
<p>&#8220;Do I still need to send in a federal income tax return?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Will I still get my federal income tax refund?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Matthews</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/04/how-much-more-will-we-take/comment-page-2/#comment-257592</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 01:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2019#comment-257592</guid>
		<description>You are all letting your imaginations get the better of you.  Our federal government will not start a war with a seceding state.  Think about it and tell me who will.  Congress?   Not on your life!  The President?  Fat chance.  It will not happen.  The feds would rather write them off than suffer the blow in the world&#039;s eyes of having a civil war - not to mention the cost of such a war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are all letting your imaginations get the better of you.  Our federal government will not start a war with a seceding state.  Think about it and tell me who will.  Congress?   Not on your life!  The President?  Fat chance.  It will not happen.  The feds would rather write them off than suffer the blow in the world&#8217;s eyes of having a civil war &#8211; not to mention the cost of such a war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

