Comments on: New Hampshire: Sovereignty over Marriage

By: Terry Morris

Terry Morris — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 05:53:44 +0000

By the way, Michael, I realize I’m late to the party’n'all, but what, in your opinion, makes these instances of states allowing gay “marriage” more significant than the 34 or 35 other instances of states denying it … insofar as it’s a “victory for decentralization?”

By: Terry Morris

Terry Morris — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 05:43:03 +0000

There are currently 34 or 35 States that already have their own marriage amendments on the books.

By: Larry

Larry — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:43:51 +0000

Gay Marriage isn’t for me, but anytime States can reclaim their rights back, I’ll support it… if people have a hard time living among gays, I’m sure there will be states that don’t allow it and a person can move there. It would be nice to see states take on some individualistic traits…

By: Allan A. Campbell

Allan A. Campbell — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:04:50 +0000

One aspect of marriage license many overlook is that its an application process requiring one’s signature to participate in a commercial privilege. In law,license is permission to do that which would otherwise be deemed illegal[i.e. driver license,etc.]. Common law marriage is automatically recognized within State statutes re: established time of cohabitation. Marriage license is actually a 3 party 14th Ammendment contract. Husband,wife,and,State govt. State connection is noticed in commencement speech by priest,judge,captain,or other,with the phrase ” By the power vested in me by the State of……”. Point being, men and women shouldn’t be getting marriage licenses. License is the proper remedy for gay people. Not gay,or proponent thereof, its the historical origin of documentation people never investigate which in the end leads to expansionary govt. We’re taught its custom and practice from what past generations beleived was good or necessary. Effect is being neck deep in 14th Ammendment contracts of voluntary servitude compelling specific performance. Marriage license,being one,makes everything which emanates from the marital relationship effectively connected to govt. State govt. asserts sovereignty over the relationship as controlling party of the 3 party contract. Example of people empowering govt. without their knowledge is when Health and Social Services come like a thief in the night taking one’s baby on allegation of child abuse. They don’t need a warrant,judge’s signature,or to produce any document. They do so as formality,but are not required to. Whats in lieau of birth certificate is a family bible or affidavit with 2 witnesses as to when,where, and to whom baby was born. True source and authority comes from the parents signatures upon the marriage license and mother’s signature upon the birth certificate. One’s signature empowers the compelling govt. interest to remove the baby. Bottom line, State and Federal 14th Ammendment documentation scheme is all by application. Meaning oneself is the moving party moving govt. into contractual relationship with oneself. Nothing is mandatory except for Title 8 U.S.Code Aliens. Thus one generation follows the past generation into perpetual signature empowerment evidencing will,intent,consent of the governed. Govt. is using element of substance authority within one’s own signature against oneself.

By: Trouble

Trouble — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 05:58:02 +0000

I’ll be throwing into the bucket when I’m out of the red again. Meantime the best thing I can do is spread the word so I keep doing it!

By: Jeff Matthews

Jeff Matthews — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:49:23 +0000

To all: You have to love what Michael is doing for us. I donated in the range of “two movie tickets, a large popcorn and 2-drink combo, and a couple of hot dogs.”

Michael’s efforts are worth far more than that. I highly encourage everyone to donate. Freedom doesn’t come for free.

By: Jeff Matthews

Jeff Matthews — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:42:56 +0000

I knew you’d say that. Pretty bad when the voters tell Arnold “no” to new taxes and continued over-spending, and being the great statesman he is, he ignores them and runs to BO.

By: Michael Boldin

Michael Boldin — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:34:59 +0000

Like Peter Schiff has said so clearly, I wish this country would just let California fail. These politicians will never, ever learn responsibility if the rest of the country is forced to pay for their reckless spending habits. What a mess.

By: Jeff Matthews

Jeff Matthews — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:59:50 +0000

Very. Off-topic, but how is the budget issue in CA coming along?

By: Michael Boldin

Michael Boldin — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:39:15 +0000

oh, I don’t have to look that one up! I’m obviously well-versed, huh?