Concordia res Parvae Crescunt
By Kahrin Deines, Associated Press
HELENA – Montana is trying to trigger a battle over gun control — and perhaps make a larger point about what many folks in this ruggedly independent state regard as a meddlesome federal government.
In a bill passed by the Legislature earlier this month, the state is asserting that guns manufactured in Montana and sold in Montana to people who intend to keep their weapons in Montana are exempt from federal gun registration, background check and dealer-licensing rules because no state lines are crossed.
That notion is all but certain to be tested in court.
The immediate effect of the law could be limited, since Montana is home to just a few specialty gun makers, known for high-end hunting rifles and replicas of Old West weapons, and because their out-of-state sales would automatically trigger federal control.
Still, much bigger prey lies in Montana’s sights: a legal showdown over how far the federal government’s regulatory authority extends.
“It’s a gun bill, but it’s another way of demonstrating the sovereignty of the state of Montana,” said Democratic Gov. Brian Schweitzer, who signed the bill.
Carrie DiPirro, a spokeswoman for the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, had no comment on the legislation. But the federal government has generally argued that it has authority under the interstate commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution to regulate guns because they can so easily be transported across state lines.
CLICK HERE TO READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE
If you enjoyed this post:
Click Here to Get the Free Tenth Amendment Center Newsletter,
2011 and beyond is your time to become self-reliant.
With the end of 2010, our introspection turns to thoughts of self-improvement, questioning and planning for what lies ahead. I believe this time in history promises to bring forth more changes than any other similar duration of time known to our civilization. The foundations of our economies, governments and belief systems will be altered and after considerable turmoil, we will see a maturing of mankind. Fundamental, systemic concerns for why undertaking this life change will not be a fly-by-night fad, but rather a long-lasting means for personal independence. I will be listing the top ten reasons to Become Self-Sufficient NOW rather than late. Over the course of the next 10 weeks, you will learn what you can do to become SELF-Sufficient. It is time to make a plan and take action.
Reason Number One:
Hedging against inflation - Have you noticed the price of food and goods lately? People might have a choice whether or not to buy gold, silver or stocks, but people have to eat. The current increases in basic goods will not ease anytime soon. It is time to make a plan and take action.
What can you do? What are others doing?
I believe more people will learn to grow their own food. We will see an explosion in the number of people growing their own food due to disruptions in the global food supply, food costs rising/inflation, contamination of our crops and land and the FDA crackdown on small farmers.
People will realize the importance of having their own source of food. We will see a surge in seed sales, backyard gardens, solar powered ovens, food storage and in-home production methods.
We will see, downsizing to a more simplistic, back to basics life, as many people will be choosing to move
out our mega- cities and seek self-reliance in more rural areas. Action step: Plan for a garden or other food methods. Buy seeds and food storage NOW.
For more about product and food news, go to http://survivalist-hub.blogspot.com/ http://www.gearupcenter.com
The so-called interstate commerce clause was first meant to "regulate" interstate commerce and not "punish"commerce. HOWEVER,with the passage of the Amendments to the US Constitution this power was totally nullified and States and the people assumed their full sovereign rights.
For too long congress has usurped them at will with the approval of the Federal Courts and the U.S. "Criminal" Supreme Court.
The federal government has no constitutional rights over firearms within the different States not only under amendment 10 but also also under amendment 2 and it's long overdue that States started to draw a line line not in the sand but in concrete and told Congress and the rest of the federal oppressive system to back off.
If we don't fight, one day it may be a federal crime going to buy a car or just grocery shopping across State lines.
I certainly hope it does bring the 10th back into the light, for the many unenlightened Americans that have no idea what it is. In my opinion, the crossing state lines commerce clause needs to be revised (clarification for judicial purposes). I'd say the clause is way to encompassing to be legal under the constitution.
The good news is that this might just begin to pull the Tenth Amendment more into the light. Not that the MSM will likely report it, but Fox might pick it up.
Art. I, Sec. 8: "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;"
It does not say "To regulate [all things that could be] Commerce..."
Great point Jeff. It also does not say "to regulate anything that might possibly affect commerce"
It was established to ensure that the states didn't impede trade throughout the country. It was another limit, not an expansion, on the power of government
Ms. DiPirro (mentioned in the article) must also think the federal government can regulate the tomato you grow in your little backyard garden since it could easily be transported across state lines.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Subscribe to entries
Subscribe to comments
All content © 2012 by Tenth Amendment Center
[...] May 3, 2009 · No Comments Associated Press | Apr 30, 2009 [...]