Comments on: Nullification: The Jeffersonian Brake on Government

By: Santa Clarita Valley Tea Party » Blog Archive » States have the Power…Encourage our State Leaders to Take Action

Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:51:45 +0000

[...] Nullification: The Jeffersonian Brake on Government- by Thomas Woods http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/03/16/nullification-the-jeffersonian-brake-on-government/ [...]

By: Randy Barnett and the Destruction of Federalism | www.GLOBALFINANCIALMELTDOWN.com

Sat, 25 Apr 2009 05:16:46 +0000

[...] Regarding nullification, historian Thomas E. Woods may have said it best: [...]

By: Randy Barnett and the Destruction of Federalism | www.GLOBALFINANCIALMELTDOWN.com

Sat, 25 Apr 2009 05:16:46 +0000

[...] Regarding nullification, historian Thomas E. Woods may have said it best: [...]

By: Randy Barnett and the Destruction of Federalism | Tenth Amendment Center

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:02:42 +0000

[...] Regarding nullification, historian Thomas E. Woods may have said it best: [...]

By: Michael Boldin

Michael Boldin — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:46:55 +0000

I would say that, in general, the federal government would be quite likely to rule any action that would override its own as “unconstitutional”

The question, however, is – does that mean that position is just and right?

By: Parmenter

Parmenter — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:18:14 +0000

I seem to remember from my pre-PC history texts that nullification was rejected and ruled unConstitutional back in the early days of the Republic.

By: Nullification: The Jeffersonian Brake on Government « ACGR’s “News with Attitude”

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:53:20 +0000

[...] The story continues ….. [...]

By: Articles about Website Ideas as of March 16, 2009 | The Lessnau Lounge

Articles about Website Ideas as of March 16, 2009 | The Lessnau Lounge — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:00:24 +0000

[...] . As if part of a giant Monopoly Game our new president could kill two birds with one stone Nullification: The Jeffersonian Brake on Government – tenthamendmentcenter.com 03/16/2009 by Thomas E. Woods, The Freeman Thinkers in the [...]

By: gpbarnett

gpbarnett — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:21:31 +0000

The nullification procedures would be an alternative to a fractured federal relationship with states, however, the Constitution made clear that the organized, and active militia of the States, as constitutionally mandated, was put in place as the direct check and balance to a power vacuum created by Usurpage of the Federal organization. With a properly founded state militia, every state would by nature be uniformly organized to deal with most problems, because the States alone would agree to send the appropriate representative(s) to D.C. to discuss and debate the situation. The misdirection of the idea of the militia as proposed all through the years by the federal organization has lead to the breakdown of the idea of State Sovereignty. The constitutionally mandated militia of the states, and not nullification is the correct and constitutionally approved method of resolve. A resolution, not by force, but by individual state support from a well “regulated” force of citizens who by their very nature as the governed portend to resolve disputes by their educated presence and insight.

By: popurls.com // popular today

popurls.com // popular today — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:40:26 +0000

popurls.com // popular today…

story has entered the popular today section on popurls.com…