<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tenth Amendment Center &#187; Wisconsin Sovereignty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/tag/wisconsin-sovereignty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:40:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Wisconsin AB203: The National Guard and the Constitution</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/31/wisconsin-ab203-national-guard-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/31/wisconsin-ab203-national-guard-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 07:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Guard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Sovereignty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AB203 "requires the governor to examine every federal order that places the Wisconsin national guard on federal active duty to determine if that order is lawful and valid. If the governor determines that the federal order is not lawful or valid, the bill requires the governor to take appropriate action, which may include commencing legal action in state or federal court, to prevent the Wisconsin national guard from being placed on federal active duty."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under the radar in most spheres until now, Wisconsin Assembly Bill 203 (introduced in April, 2009) seeks to restore a Constitutional balance to the common practice of federalizing the national guard.</p>
<p>AB203 &#8220;requires the governor to examine every federal order that places the Wisconsin national guard on federal active duty to determine if that order is lawful and valid. If the governor determines that the federal order is not lawful or valid, the bill requires the governor to take appropriate action, which may include commencing legal action in state or federal court, to prevent the Wisconsin national guard from being placed on federal active duty.&#8221;</p>
<p>The bill also &#8220;requires the governor to submit to the appropriate standing committees of the legislature a summary of the governor&#8217;s review of every federal order that places the Wisconsin national guard on federal active duty and any action he or she takes in response to that review.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Guard considers its charter to be the Constitution of the United States, and specifically mentions Article I, Section 8, Clause 15:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Clause 15 provides that the Congress has three constitutional grounds for calling up the militia &#8212; &#8220;to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrection and repel invasions.&#8221; All three standards appear to be applicable only to the Territory of the United States.</em></p>
<p>Read the full text of the Bill below:<strong><span id="more-1984"></span></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows: </em></strong></p>
<p>AB203, s. 1<br />
Section 1. 321.02 (3) of the statutes is created to read:</p>
<p>321.02 (3) The governor shall examine every federal order that places the national guard on federal active duty after the effective date of this subsection &#8230;. [LRB inserts date], to determine whether the order is lawful and valid. If the governor determines that the order is not lawful or valid, he or she shall take appropriate action to prevent the national guard from being placed on federal active duty. Appropriate action may include commencing a legal action in state or federal court to prevent the national guard from being placed on federal active duty.</p>
<p>The governor shall submit a report to the standing committees of the legislature with specified subject matter jurisdiction over military affairs, as provided under s. 13.172 (3), that summarizes his or her review of every order that places the national guard on federal active duty and any action he or she takes in response to that review, within 30 days after his or her review is complete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/31/wisconsin-ab203-national-guard-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10th Amendment Resolution Introduced in Wisconsin</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/12/10th-amendment-resolution-introduced-in-wisconsin/</link>
		<comments>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/12/10th-amendment-resolution-introduced-in-wisconsin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State Sovereignty Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin SR6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 9, 2009, Wisconsin State Senators Leibham, Lazich, Darling, Grothman, Harsdorf and Schultz introduced Senate Resolution 6 (SR6) to claim &#8220;sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the U.S.Constitution&#8221; Read the full text of the resolution [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On April 9, 2009, Wisconsin State Senators Leibham, Lazich, Darling, Grothman, Harsdorf and Schultz introduced Senate Resolution 6 (SR6) to claim &#8220;sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the U.S.Constitution&#8221;</p>
<p>Read the full text of the resolution below:<span id="more-1295"></span></p>
<p><strong>Whereas</strong>, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads, â€œThe powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the peopleâ€; and</p>
<p><strong>Whereas</strong>, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the U.S. Constitution and no more; and</p>
<p><strong>Whereas</strong>, as the scope of power is defined by the Tenth Amendment, the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and</p>
<p><strong>Whereas</strong>, today the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and</p>
<p><strong>Whereas</strong>, the legislature has forwarded to the federal government numerous resolutions opposing federal encroachment on state powers but has received no response or result from Congress or the federal government; and</p>
<p><strong>Whereas</strong>, many federal mandates are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and</p>
<p><strong>Whereas</strong>, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992) that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and</p>
<p><strong>Whereas</strong>, a number of federal proposals from previous administrations and some now pending from the present administration and from Congress may further violate the U.S. Constitution; now, therefore, be it</p>
<p><strong>Resolved</strong> by the senate, That the senate hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the U.S.Constitution; and, be it further</p>
<p><strong>Resolved</strong>, That adoption of this resolution does not constitute an application for the calling of a federal Constitutional Convention within the meaning of Article V of the U.S. Constitution; and, be it further</p>
<p><strong>Resolved</strong>, That this resolution shall serve as notice and demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of its constitutionally delegated powers; and, be it further</p>
<p><strong>Resolved</strong>, That the senate chief clerk shall provide copies of this joint resolution to the president of the United States, to the speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, to the presiding officer of each house of each state legislature of the United States, and to each member of this stateâ€™s congressional delegation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/12/10th-amendment-resolution-introduced-in-wisconsin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

