<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tenth Amendment Center &#187; Texas HCR50</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/tag/texas-hcr50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:40:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Texas House to Feds: Back Off</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/30/texas-house-feds-back-off/</link>
		<comments>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/30/texas-house-feds-back-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 23:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State Sovereignty Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas HCR50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Sovereignty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After being nearly derailed on a technicality this month, Texas House Concurrent Resolution 50 (HCR50) was brought back for a vote today, and passed by a wide margin.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After being nearly derailed on a technicality earlier this month, Texas House Concurrent Resolution 50 (HCR50) was brought back for a vote today, and passed by a wide margin.</p>
<p>The resolution affirms that &#8220;the State of Texas claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the U.S. Constitution, serving notice to the federal government to cease and desist certain mandates, and providing that certain federal legislation be prohibited or repealed.&#8221;</p>
<p>The final vote was 99-36. (<a href="http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup/RecordVote.aspx?LegSess=81R&amp;Bill=HCR50&amp;RcdVtNo=1544&amp;Ch=H&amp;Dt=05/30/2009" target="_blank">click here to see the tally</a>)</p>
<p>Hereâ€™s the full text of the resolution:<span id="more-2001"></span></p>
<p>WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows: â€œThe powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the peopleâ€; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, The scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, Today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, Many federal laws are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment assures that we, the people of the United States of America and each sovereign state in the Union of States, now have, and have always had, rights the federal government may not usurp; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, Section 4, Article IV, of the Constitution says, â€œThe United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,â€ and the Ninth Amendment states that â€œThe enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the peopleâ€; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, The United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, A number of proposals from previous administrations and some now pending from the present administration and from congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States; now, therefore, be it</p>
<p>RESOLVED, That the 81st Legislature of the State of Texas hereby claim sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States; and, be it further</p>
<p>RESOLVED, That this serve as notice and demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers; and, be it further</p>
<p>RESOLVED, That all compulsory federal legislation that directs states to comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties or sanctions or that requires states to pass legislation or lose federal funding be prohibited or repealed; and, be it further</p>
<p>RESOLVED, That the Texas secretary of state forward official copies of this resolution to the president of the United States, to the speaker of the house of representatives and the president of the senate of the United States Congress, and to all the members of the Texas delegation to the congress with the request that this resolution be officially entered in the Congressional Record as a memorial to the Congress of the United States of America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/30/texas-house-feds-back-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas versus the Federal Government?</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/10/texas-versus-the-federal-government/</link>
		<comments>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/10/texas-versus-the-federal-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tenth Amendment</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State Sovereignty Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas HCR50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Sovereignty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gov. Rick Perry on Thursday joined state Rep. Brandon Creighton and sponsors of House Concurrent Resolution (HCR) 50 in support of statesâ€™ rights under the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="340" height="280"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wOBtSuocwsU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wOBtSuocwsU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="340" height="280"></embed></object><span id="more-1246"></span></p>
<p><em>from the Office of Texas Gov. Rick Perry</em></p>
<p>Gov. Rick Perry on Thursday joined state Rep. Brandon Creighton and sponsors of House Concurrent Resolution (HCR) 50 in support of statesâ€™ rights under the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.</p>
<p>â€œI believe that our federal government has become oppressive in its size, its intrusion into the lives of our citizens, and its interference with the affairs of our state,â€ Gov. Perry said.</p>
<p>â€œThat is why I am here today to express my unwavering support for efforts all across our country to reaffirm the statesâ€™ rights affirmed by the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. I believe that returning to the letter and spirit of the U.S. Constitution and its essential 10th Amendment will free our state from undue regulations, and ultimately strengthen our Union.â€</p>
<p>A number of recent federal proposals are not within the scope of the federal governmentâ€™s constitutionally designated powers and impede the statesâ€™ right to govern themselves. HCR 50 affirms that Texas claims sovereignty under the 10th Amendment over all powers not otherwise granted to the federal government.</p>
<p>It also designates that all compulsory federal legislation that requires states to comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties, or that requires states to pass legislation or lose federal funding, be prohibited or repealed.</p>
<p>HCR 50 is authored by Representatives Brandon Creighton, Leo Berman, Bryan Hughes, Dan Gattis and Ryan Guillen.</p>
<p>To view the full text of the resolution, please visit:<br />
<a href="http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/html/HC00050I.htm">http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/html/HC00050I.htm</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/10/texas-versus-the-federal-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

