<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tenth Amendment Center &#187; Tennessee Sovereignty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/tag/tennessee-sovereignty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:15:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Battle Begins: ATF vs the Constitution</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/07/18/the-battle-begins-atf-vs-the-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/07/18/the-battle-begins-atf-vs-the-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tenth Amendment</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearms Freedom Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Sovereignty Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Sovereignty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A line was drawn in the sand last week- a response by the Federal Government to the State of Tennessee and their assertion of sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>by Bryce Shonka</em></p>
<p>A line was drawn in the sand last week &#8211; a response by the Federal Government to the State of Tennessee and their assertion of sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution.</p>
<p><em>(Editor&#8217;s note: A similar response was sent to Montana Firearms licenses on 07-16-09 as well)</em></p>
<p>Part of a series of moves by states seeking to utilize the Tenth Amendment as a limit on Federal Power,Â  the Tennessee State Senate approved Senate Bill 1610 (SB1610), the <a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/03/tennessee-firearms-freedom-act-passes-both-houses/">Tennesse Firearms Freedom Act</a>, by a vote of 22-7.Â  The House companion bill, HB1796 previously passed the House by a vote of 87-1.</p>
<p>Governor Breseden allowed the bill to become law without signing.<span id="more-2457"></span></p>
<p>The law states that â€œfederal laws and regulations do not apply to personal firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition that is manufactured in Tennessee and remains in Tennessee. The limitation on federal law and regulation stated in this bill applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured using basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported into this state.â€</p>
<p>At the time of passage through the TN House and Senate, Judiciary Chairman Mae Beavers had this to say-</p>
<p>â€œBe it the federal government mandating changes in order for states to receive federal funds or the federal government telling us how to regulate commerce contained completely within this state â€“ enough is enough.Â  Our founders fought too hard to ensure statesâ€™ sovereignty and I am sick and tired of activist federal officials and judges sticking their noses where they donâ€™t belong.â€</p>
<p>The Federal Government, by way of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms expressed its own view of the Tenth Amendment this week when it issued an open letter to â€˜all Tennessee Federal Firearms Licenseesâ€™ in which it denounced the opinion of Beavers and the Tennessee legislature.Â  ATF assistant director Carson W. Carroll wrote that â€˜Federal law supersedes the Actâ€™, and thus the ATF considers it meaningless.</p>
<p>Constitutional historian Kevin R.C. Gutzman sees this as something far removed from the foundersâ€™ vision of constitutional government:</p>
<p>â€œThe letter says, in part, â€˜because the Act conflicts with Federal firearms laws and regulations, Federal law supersedes the Act, and all provisions of the Gun Control Act and the National Firearms Act, and their corresponding regulations, continue to apply.â€™ That is precisely what I predicted the Federal Government&#8217;s response to the Tennessee act would be.Â  <a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/05/napolitano-gutzman-discuss-tennesse-firearms-freedom-act/">As I told Judge Andrew Napolitano on Fox News&#8217;s Glenn Beck Program on June 5, 2009</a>, federal officials don&#8217;t care about a good historical argument concerning the meaning of the Constitution.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Their view is that the states exist for the administrative convenience of the Federal Government, and so of course any conflict between state and federal policy must be resolved in favor of the latter.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;This is another way of saying that the Tenth Amendment is not binding on the Federal Government. Of course, that amounts to saying that federal officials have decided to ignore the Constitution when it doesn&#8217;t suit them.â€</p>
<p>The Federal Government has regularly claimed that the commerce clause of the constitution, which gives DC authority to regulate commerce between the states, gives them authority to regulate or add prohibitions on items that never cross state lines.</p>
<p>One notable use of the commerce clause in this manner can be found in the 2005 decision by the Supreme Court in â€˜Gonzales vs. Raichâ€™, whereÂ  the court contended that consuming one&#8217;s locally grown marijuana for medical purposes affects the interstate market of marijuana, and hence that the federal government may regulateâ€”and prohibitâ€”such consumption.Â  They used this claim, even though at the same time they made it clear that no legal market for marijuana exists.</p>
<p>One key aspect of the ATFâ€™s letter is that it was only sent out to existing Federal Firearms Licensees, those generally already in compliance with federal regulations &#8211; and who likely would not have participated in the TN Firearms Freedom act anyway, according to sources close to Tenth Amendment Center.</p>
<p>Ultimately what the letter represents is another move in the chess match being played out between the states and the Federal Government, the resolution of which may not be seen for quite some time.<br />
<strong><br />
Below is the full text of the letter sent last week by the ATF:</strong></p>
<p>â€œU.S. Department of Justice<br />
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,<br />
Firearms and Explosives<br />
Assistant Director<br />
OPEN LETTER TO ALL TENNESSEE<br />
FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEES</p>
<p>The purpose of this letter is to provide guidance on your obligations as a Federal firearms licensee (&#8220;FFL&#8221;). The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (&#8220;ATF&#8221;) is dedicated to your success in meeting your requirements as a Federal firearms licensee. The following guidance is intended to assist you in accomplishing this goal.</p>
<p>The passage of the Tennessee Firearms Freedom Act, H.B. 1796, 106th Leg. (Tenn. 2009) 1796 (&#8220;Act&#8221;), effective June 19, 2009, has generated questions from industry members as to how this State law may affect them while engaged in a firearms business activity. The Act purports to exempt personal firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition manufactured in the State, and which remain in the State, from most Federal firearms laws and regulations. However, because the Act conflicts with Federal firearms laws and regulations, Federal law supersedes the Act, and all provisions of the Gun Control Act and the National Firearms Act, and their corresponding regulations, continue to apply.</p>
<p>As you may know, Federal law requires a license to engage in the business of manufacturing firearms or ammunition, or to deal in firearms, even if the firearms or ammunition remain within the same state. All firearms manufactured by a licensee must be properly marked. Additionally, each licensee must record the type, model, caliber or gauge, and serial number of each firearm manufactured or otherwise acquired, and the date such manufacture or other acquisition was made. The information required must be recorded in the licensee&#8217;s records not later than the seventh day following the date such manufacture or other acquisition was made. Firearms transaction records and NICS background checks must be conducted prior to disposition of firearms to unlicensed persons. These, as well as other Federal requirements and prohibitions, apply whether or not the firearms or ammunition have crossed state lines.</p>
<p>If you have any questions regarding the Federal firearms laws and regulations, please contact your local ATF office. ATF works closely with the firearms industry and appreciates the important role the industry plays in combating violent crime. A listing of ATF office phone numbers can be found at http://www.atf.gov/contact/field.htm. Carson W. Carroll, Assistant Director (Enforcement Programs and Services)â€</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/07/18/the-battle-begins-atf-vs-the-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>135</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tennessee Governor Signs Sovereignty Resolution</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/27/tennessee-governor-signs-sovereignty-resolution/</link>
		<comments>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/27/tennessee-governor-signs-sovereignty-resolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State Sovereignty Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee HJR108]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenth Amendment Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, Tennesse Governor Phil Bresden signed House Joint Resolution 108 (HJR0108), authored by State Rep. Susan Lynn. Six other states have had both houses of their legislature pass similar resolutions - Alaska, Idaho, North Dakota, South Dakota, Oklahoma and Louisiana - but Tennessee is the first to have such a resolution signed by the Governor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>by Michael Boldin</em></p>
<p>This week, Tennesse Governor <a href="http://www.tennesseeanytime.org/governor/Welcome.do" target="_blank">Phil Bredesen</a> signed House Joint Resolution 108 (HJR0108), authored by State Rep. <a href="http://www.repsusanlynn.com/" target="_blank">Susan Lynn</a>.Â  The resolution &#8220;Urges Congress to recognize Tennessee&#8217;s sovereignty under the tenth amendment to the Constitution.&#8221;</p>
<p>The House passed the resolution on 05/26 by a vote of 85-2 and the Senate passed it on 06/12 by a vote of 31-0.</p>
<p>Six other states have had both houses of their legislature pass similar resolutions &#8211; Alaska, Idaho, North Dakota, South Dakota, Oklahoma and Louisiana &#8211; but Tennessee is the first to have such a resolution signed by the Governor.<span id="more-2275"></span></p>
<p><strong>A GROWING MOVEMENT</strong></p>
<p>Passage of this resolution appears to be part of what is now a growing state-level resistance to the federal government on various levels.Â Â  Similar 10th Amendment resolutions have been introduced in 36 states around the country, and various states are considering single-issue legislation in direct contravention to federal laws.</p>
<p>Most recently, the Arizona Legislature passed a measure for public approval on the 2010 state ballot that <a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/26/arizona-hcr2014-national-health-care-nullification/">would give Arizona voters the opportunity to nullify, or opt out, of any potential national health care legislation</a>.</p>
<p>Since 2007, more than two dozen states have passed legislation refusing to implement the Real ID act of 2005.Â  In response, the federal government has recently announced that they want to &#8220;<a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/16/real-id-on-its-way-out/">repeal and replace</a>&#8221; the law due to a rebellion by states.</p>
<p>Pending legislation in states around the country also includes preventing state law enforcement officials from enforcing federal laws, refusing federal gun regulations, refusing to send a state&#8217;s national guard to any duty other than what the constitution authorizes, legalizing marijuana for various purposes and more.</p>
<p><strong>A FIRST STEP<br />
</strong></p>
<p>While HJR0108 is strongly-word in support of the principles of limited, constitutional government that the 10th Amendment represents, it is a Joint Resolution and does not carry with it the force of law.Â  But supporters say that this is an important first step to get their message out not only to grassroots supporters, but to the media, and legislators in other states as well.</p>
<p>In additional to callingÂ  on the federal government to abide by the constitution, it also states thatÂ  &#8220;a committee of conference and correspondence be appointed by the Speaker of the House and of the Senate, which shall have as its charge to communicate the preceding resolution to the legislatures of the several states, to assure them that this State continues in the same esteem of their friendship and to call for a joint working group between the states to enumerate the abuses of authority by the federal government and to seek repeal of the assumption of powers and the imposed mandates.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Read the final version of the resolution below:</strong></p>
<p>WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows: â€œThe powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the peopleâ€; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; now, therefore,</p>
<p>BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, THE SENATE</p>
<p>CONCURRING, that we hereby affirm Tennesseeâ€™s sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.</p>
<p>BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a committee of conference and correspondence be appointed by the Speaker of the House and of the Senate, which shall have as its charge to communicate the preceding resolution to the legislatures of the several states, to assure them that this State continues in the same esteem of their friendship and to call for a joint working group between the states to enumerate the abuses of authority by the federal government and to seek repeal of the assumption of powers and the imposed mandates.</p>
<p>BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be transmitted to the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker and the Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, and to each member of Tennesseeâ€™s Congressional delegation.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/23/state-sovereignty-resolutions/">CLICK HERE FOR A FULL LIST OF STATE SOVEREIGNTY RESOLUTIONS</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/27/tennessee-governor-signs-sovereignty-resolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tennessee Senate Unanimously Affirms Sovereignty</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/12/tennessee-senate-unanimously-affirms-sovereignty/</link>
		<comments>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/12/tennessee-senate-unanimously-affirms-sovereignty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State Sovereignty Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee HJR108]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenth Amendment Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the Tennessee State Senate unanimously voted to pass, as amended, House Joint Resolution 108 (HJR0108).  This resolution "Urges Congress to recognize Tennessee's sovereignty under the tenth amendment to the Constitution." Tennessee joins Alaska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Idaho and Oklahoma - as the sixth state to have both the House and Senate pass a resolution in support of the 10th Amendment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the Tennessee State Senate unanimously voted to pass, as amended, House Joint Resolution 108 (HJR0108).Â  The resolution &#8220;Urges Congress to recognize Tennessee&#8217;s sovereignty under the tenth amendment to the Constitution.&#8221;</p>
<p>The State House <a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/27/tennessee-house-affirms-sovereignty/">passed the resolution on 05-26-09</a> by a vote of 85-2.</p>
<p>Tennessee joins Alaska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Idaho and Oklahoma &#8211; as the sixth state to have both their House and Senate pass a resolution in support of the 10th Amendment.</p>
<p>The final vote was 31-0. (h/t Steve Rowland)</p>
<p><strong>Read the final version of the resolution below:<span id="more-2107"></span></strong></p>
<p>WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows: â€œThe powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the peopleâ€; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; now, therefore,</p>
<p>BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, THE SENATE</p>
<p>CONCURRING, that we hereby affirm Tennesseeâ€™s sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.</p>
<p>BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a committee of conference and correspondence be appointed by the Speaker of the House and of the Senate, which shall have as its charge to communicate the preceding resolution to the legislatures of the several states, to assure them that this State continues in the same esteem of their friendship and to call for a joint working group between the states to enumerate the abuses of authority by the federal government and to seek repeal of the assumption of powers and the imposed mandates.</p>
<p>BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be transmitted to the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker and the Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, and to each member of Tennesseeâ€™s Congressional delegation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/12/tennessee-senate-unanimously-affirms-sovereignty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Napolitano, Gutzman Discuss Tennesse Firearms Freedom Act</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/05/napolitano-gutzman-discuss-tennesse-firearms-freedom-act/</link>
		<comments>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/05/napolitano-gutzman-discuss-tennesse-firearms-freedom-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearms Freedom Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Sovereignty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="340" height="280"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ei_i-vuxhh8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ei_i-vuxhh8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="340" height="280"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/05/napolitano-gutzman-discuss-tennesse-firearms-freedom-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tennessee: Firearms Freedom Act Passes Both Houses</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/03/tennessee-firearms-freedom-act-passes-both-houses/</link>
		<comments>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/03/tennessee-firearms-freedom-act-passes-both-houses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enumerated Powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms Freedom Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce-clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Sovereignty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On its way to the Governor's desk, the bill states that "federal laws and regulations do not apply to personal firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition that is manufactured in Tennessee and remains in Tennessee."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the Tennessee State Senate approved Senate Bill 1610 (SB1610), the Tennesse Firearms Freedom Act, by a vote of 22-7.Â  The House companion bill, HB1796 previously passed the House by a vote of 87-1.</p>
<p>On its way to the Governor&#8217;s desk, the bill states that &#8220;federal laws and regulations do not apply to personal firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition that is manufactured in Tennessee and remains in Tennessee. The limitation on federal law and regulation stated in this bill applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured using basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported into this state.&#8221;</p>
<p>The bill also states that &#8220;firearms accessories imported into Tennessee that are subject to federal regulation do not subject a firearm to federal regulation under interstate commerce simply because they are attached to or used in conjunction with a firearm in Tennessee.&#8221;</p>
<p>â€œBe it the federal government mandating changes in order for states to receive federal funds or the federal government telling us how to regulate commerce contained completely within this state â€“ enough is enough,â€ urged Judiciary Chairman Mae Beavers. â€œOur founders fought too hard to ensure statesâ€™ sovereignty and I am sick and tired of activist federal officials and judges sticking their noses where they donâ€™t belong.â€</p>
<p>Read the Full Text of the Bill Below:</p>
<p>AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, relative to exempting from regulation under the commerce clause of the Constitution of the United States a firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured and retained in Tennessee.</p>
<p>BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE:</p>
<p>SECTION 1. Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, is amended by adding Sections 2 through 7 of this act as a new chapter thereto.</p>
<p>SECTION 2. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the &#8220;Tennessee Firearms Freedom Act&#8221;.</p>
<p>SECTION 3. The general assembly declares that the authority for this act is the following:</p>
<p>(1) The tenth amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees to the states and their people all powers not granted to the federal government elsewhere in the Constitution and reserves to the state and people of Tennessee certain powers as they were understood at the time that Tennessee was admitted to statehood. The guarantee of those powers is a matter of contract between the state and people of Tennessee and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Tennessee and the United States;</p>
<p>(2) The ninth amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees to the people rights not granted in the Constitution and reserves to the people of Tennessee certain rights as they were understood at the time that Tennessee was admitted to statehood. The guarantee of those rights is a matter of contract between the state and people of Tennessee and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Tennessee and the United States.</p>
<p>(3) The regulation of intrastate commerce is vested in the states under the ninth and tenth amendments to the United States Constitution, particularly if not expressly preempted by federal law. Congress has not expressly preempted state regulation of intrastate commerce pertaining to the manufacture on an intrastate basis of firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition;</p>
<p>(4) The second amendment to the United States Constitution reserves to the people the right to keep and bear arms as that right was understood at the time that Tennessee was admitted to statehood, and the guarantee of the right is a matter of contract between the state and people of Tennessee and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Tennessee and the United States; and</p>
<p>(5) The Tennessee Constitution clearly secures to Tennessee citizens, and prohibits government interference with, the right of individual Tennessee citizens to keep and bear arms.</p>
<p>SECTION 4. As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:</p>
<p>(1) &#8220;Firearms accessories&#8221; means items that are used in conjunction with or mounted upon a firearm but are not essential to the basic function of a firearm, including but not limited to telescopic or laser sights, magazines, flash or sound suppressors, folding or aftermarket stocks and grips, speedloaders, ammunition carriers, and lights for target illumination;</p>
<p>(2) &#8220;Generic and insignificant parts&#8221; includes but is not limited to springs, screws, nuts, and pins; and</p>
<p>(3) &#8220;Manufactured&#8221; means creating a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition from basic materials for functional usefulness, including but not limited to forging, casting, machining, or other processes for working materials.</p>
<p>SECTION 5. A personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately in Tennessee and that remains within the borders of Tennessee is not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce. It is declared by the legislature that those items have not traveled in interstate commerce. This section applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured in Tennessee from basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported into this state. Generic and insignificant parts that have other manufacturing or consumer product applications are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition, and their importation into Tennessee and incorporation into a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured in Tennessee does not subject the firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition to federal regulation. It is declared by the legislature that basic materials, such as unmachined steel and unshaped wood, are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition and are not subject to congressional authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition under interstate commerce as if they were actually firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition. The authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce in basic materials does not include authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition made in Tennessee from those materials. Firearms accessories that are imported into Tennessee from another state and that are subject to federal regulation as being in interstate commerce do not subject a firearm to federal regulation under interstate commerce because they are attached to or used in conjunction with a firearm in Tennessee.</p>
<p>SECTION 6. Section 5 of this act shall not apply to:</p>
<p>(1) A firearm that cannot be carried and used by one (1) person;</p>
<p>(2) A firearm that has a bore diameter greater than one and one half (1 Â½) inches and that uses smokeless powder, not black powder, as a propellant;</p>
<p>(3) Ammunition with a projectile that explodes using an explosion of chemical energy after the projectile leaves the firearm; or</p>
<p>(4) A firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with one activation of the trigger or other firing device.</p>
<p>SECTION 7. A firearm manufactured or sold in Tennessee under this chpater must have the words &#8220;Made in Tennessee&#8221; clearly stamped on a central metallic part, such as the receiver or frame.</p>
<p>SECTION 8. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law, the public welfare requiring it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/03/tennessee-firearms-freedom-act-passes-both-houses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tennessee House Affirms Sovereignty under the 10th Amendment</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/27/tennessee-house-affirms-sovereignty/</link>
		<comments>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/27/tennessee-house-affirms-sovereignty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State Sovereignty Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee HJR108]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenth Amendment Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 05-26-09 Tennessee's House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed House Joint Resolution 108 (HJR0108), which was introduced by Susan Lynn in February.  After adopting one amendment, the final version passed 85-2. 

The resolution urges Congress to recognize Tennessee's sovereignty under the 10th Amendment, and is ready for transmittal to the State Senate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 05-26-09 Tennessee&#8217;s House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed House Joint Resolution 108 (HJR0108), which was introduced by Susan Lynn in February.Â  After adopting one amendment, the final version passed 85-2.</p>
<p>The resolution urges Congress to recognize Tennessee&#8217;s sovereignty under the 10th Amendment, and is ready for transmittal to the State Senate.</p>
<p><strong>Read the full text of the resolution below:<span id="more-1911"></span></strong></p>
<p>WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows: â€œThe powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the peopleâ€; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; now, therefore,</p>
<p>BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, THE SENATE</p>
<p>CONCURRING, that we hereby affirm Tennesseeâ€™s sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.</p>
<p>BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a committee of conference and correspondence be appointed by the Speaker of the House and of the Senate, which shall have as its charge to communicate the preceding resolution to the legislatures of the several states, to assure them that this State continues in the same esteem of their friendship and to call for a joint working group between the states to enumerate the abuses of authority by the federal government and to seek repeal of the assumption of powers and the imposed mandates.</p>
<p>BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be transmitted to the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker and the Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, and to each member of Tennesseeâ€™s Congressional delegation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/27/tennessee-house-affirms-sovereignty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tennessee Senate Affirms Sovereignty under the 10th Amendment</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/05/tennessee-senate-affirms-sovereignty-under-the-10th-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/05/tennessee-senate-affirms-sovereignty-under-the-10th-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State Sovereignty Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenessee SJR0311]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Sovereignty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 4th, the Tennessee State Senate voted unanimously in support of Senate Joint Resolution 311 (31 yay - 0 nay).  The resolution, sponsored by Senator Randy McNally, is designed to send Congress a message that the federal government has overstepped its Constitutional bounds by mandating a massive amount of federal policies upon the states in violation of the 10th Amendment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 4th, the Tennessee State Senate voted unanimously in support of Senate Joint Resolution 311 (31 yay &#8211; 0 nay).Â  The resolution, sponsored by Senator Randy McNally, is designed to send Congress a message that the federal government has overstepped its Constitutional bounds by mandating a massive amount of federal policies upon the states in violation of the 10th Amendment.</p>
<p>The resolution now awaits transmittal to the House.</p>
<p>Read the full text below:<span id="more-1552"></span></p>
<p>WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows:</p>
<p>&#8220;The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.&#8221;; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, many federal laws are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment assures that we, the people of the United States of America and each sovereign state in the Union of States, now have, and have always had, rights the federal government may not usurp; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, Article IV, Section 4 says, &#8220;The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government&#8221;, and the Ninth Amendment states that &#8220;The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people&#8221;; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, a number of proposals from previous administrations and some now pending from the present administration and from Congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States; now, therefore,</p>
<p>BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SENATE OF THE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CONCURRING, that the State of Tennessee hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.</p>
<p>BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this serve as Notice and Demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers.</p>
<p>BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all compulsory federal legislation which directs states to comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties or sanctions or requires states to pass legislation or lose federal funding be prohibited or repealed.</p>
<p>BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be distributed to the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the Speaker of the House and the Speaker of the Senate of each state&#8217;s legislature of the United States of America, and each member of the Tennessee Congressional Delegation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/05/tennessee-senate-affirms-sovereignty-under-the-10th-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HJR108: State Sovereignty for Tennessee</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/23/hjr108-state-sovereignty-for-tennessee/</link>
		<comments>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/23/hjr108-state-sovereignty-for-tennessee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tenth Amendment</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Founding Principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enumerated Powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Sovereignty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Susan Lynn, 57th District Rep., Tennessee State sovereignty is a big deal to state legislators; hopefully, it is to you as well. It is what keeps the federal government from over stepping its constitutional bounds. Today many state legislators, including some in Tennessee, have decided it is time to affirm state sovereignty under the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>by Susan Lynn, 57th District Rep., Tennessee</em></p>
<p>State sovereignty is a big deal to state legislators; hopefully, it is to you as well. It is what keeps the federal government from over stepping its constitutional bounds.</p>
<p>Today many state legislators, including some in Tennessee, have decided it is time to affirm state sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and demand the federal government halt its practice of assuming powers and of imposing mandates upon the states for purposes not enumerated by the Constitution.</p>
<p>The history of the formation of our federal government is long and complex but what the framers sought was a government that protected manâ€™s natural rights; declared by the Declaration of Independence to be the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; better interpreted to mean that all men, by nature are equally free and independent with the right to work, acquire property and pursue their own individual happiness. <span id="more-228"></span></p>
<p>When the Constitution was drawn, the various states in existence already had Constitutions with several enumerated rights. Therefore, many of the framers believed that it was not necessary to include individual rights in a federal constitution. They feared that in doing so, the Constitution might incorrectly be construed as a document which limited the rights of the people and of the states.</p>
<p>Eventually the supporters of a bill of rights won out, and the Bill of Rights was drafted to guarantee equal rights for all Americans but compromise also brought the Tenth Amendment guaranteeing limits on federal power;</p>
<p>1. Freedoms of speech, press and religion</p>
<p>2. People&#8217;s right to keep and bear arms</p>
<p>3. Protection from quartering troops</p>
<p>4. To be free of unreasonable searches and seizures</p>
<p>5. Right to due process and the prohibition of double jeopardy</p>
<p>6. Trial by jury and other rights of the accused</p>
<p>7. Right to civil trial by jury</p>
<p>8. Prohibition of excessive bail, as well as prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment</p>
<p>9. Protection of rights not specifically enumerated in the Bill of Rights</p>
<p>10. Powers reserved for the states and people</p>
<p>As you can see, the various rights are not necessarily rights that exist in the state of nature but rather rights designed to affirm and protect our natural rights; for example, freedom of the press protects liberty, and trial by jury protects life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.</p>
<p>The state sovereignty movement seeks to remind the federal government that the Tenth Amendment ensures that &#8220;The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.&#8221;</p>
<p>After all, the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states. However today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government. Many powers and federal mandates are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution; this limits our freedom and costs taxpayers untold billions of dollars &#8211; or should I say trillions?</p>
<p>I believe that it is time we step forth as other states are doing and affirm Tennessee&#8217;s sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States. We should also demand that the federal government halt and reverse its practice of assuming powers and of imposing mandates upon the states for purposes not enumerated by the Constitution. Tennessee HJR 108 will do just that. With your support, hopefully, we can begin to reverse the federal power grab.</p>
<p><em>Susan Lynn [<a href="mailto: rep.susan.lynn@legislature.state.tn.us">send her email</a>] is a member of the Tennessee General Assembly; serving on the Commerce Committee and Chairman of the Government Operations committee. She holds a BS in economics and a minor in history. She is the Chairman of the American Legislative Exchange Council&#8217;s Commerce Task Force.Â  Visit her blog at <a href="http://susan-lynn.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://susan-lynn.blogspot.com</a><br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/23/hjr108-state-sovereignty-for-tennessee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

