<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tenth Amendment Center &#187; government-subsidies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/tag/government-subsidies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:40:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>House Democrats aim at oil industry subsidies</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/01/12/house-democrats-aim-at-oil-industry-subsidies/</link>
		<comments>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/01/12/house-democrats-aim-at-oil-industry-subsidies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tenth Amendment</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLEAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government-subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house-of-representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil-industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenth-amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/01/12/house-democrats-aim-at-oil-industry-subsidies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Reuters: Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday introduced a bill that would rescind billions of dollars worth of tax incentives extended to U.S. energy companies and put the money into a fund earmarked for renewable energy. Sponsors of the Creating Long-term Energy Alternatives for the Nation Act, or CLEAN, said it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.aol.com/politics/story/_a/house-democrats-aim-at-oil-industry/n20070112174709990039?cid=771" target="_blank">From Reuters</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives  on Friday introduced a bill that would rescind billions of dollars worth of tax incentives extended to U.S. energy companies and put the money into a fund earmarked for renewable energy.</em></p>
<p><em>Sponsors of the Creating Long-term Energy Alternatives for the Nation Act, or CLEAN, said it will save U.S. taxpayers about $13 billion over an unspecified number of years, but industry groups said it could hinder U.S. oil companies&#8217; ability to find and develop new energy sources.</em></p>
<p><em>Going after &#8220;Big Oil&#8221; is a top priority of the House of Representatives&#8217; Democratic leadership, which says oil companies have earned record profits at the expense of U.S. motorists paying high gasoline prices. </em></p></blockquote>
<p>Although the politicians on both sides of the aisle would like us to think that it&#8217;s in their Constitutional authority to engage in subsidies, energy research and the like, we challenge everyone to find one word in the Constitution that authorizes such activity.</p>
<div style="padding-right: 5px; padding-top: 10px; float: left"><!--adsense--></div>
<p>The title here is interesting, and may even mislead.  While it&#8217;s quite good for politicians to &#8220;go after&#8221; subsidies (and hopefully end them) &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t do any good at all if they just take that subsidy and give it to someone else.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just what&#8217;s happening here.  The politicians, acting like a mafia cartel once again, are taking money from one group, and giving it to another.  All the while, they continue extracting your tax money for these and other unconstitutional ventures.</p>
<p>They claim this program will &#8220;save $13 billion&#8221;  But remember, virtually every time the government starts a new program, it ends up costing much much more than they advertised in the beginning.</p>
<p>If they told us the truth about these things, the war in Iraq would be paid for by Iraqi oil, the income tax never would&#8217;ve gone above 6%, Social Security tax would only be 2%, and on and on, and on.</p>
<p>What really needs to happen is for &#8220;we the people&#8221; to &#8220;go after&#8221; big government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/01/12/house-democrats-aim-at-oil-industry-subsidies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

