<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tenth Amendment Center &#187; drivers-licenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/tag/drivers-licenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:40:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>REAL IDiocy</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/02/01/real-idiocy/</link>
		<comments>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/02/01/real-idiocy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tenth Amendment</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Becky Akers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drivers-license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drivers-licenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national-id]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real ID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/02/01/real-idiocy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guest Commentary by Becky Akers Published with Permission from LewRockwell.com Maineâ€™s state legislature &#8220;RESOLVED&#8221; almost unanimously last week that it will &#8220;refuse&#8230; to implement the REAL ID Act&#8230;.&#8221; As if that werenâ€™t enough, it &#8220;implores the United States Congress to repeal the REAL ID Act&#8230;&#8221; What? Go ahead and re-read it. Took me a few [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><span style="font-size: xx-small;">Guest Commentary by Becky Akers<br />
Published with Permission from <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com" target="_blank">LewRockwell.com</a></span></em></p>
<p>Maineâ€™s state legislature  &#8220;<a href="http://www.mainesenate.org/mitchell/realid.htm">RESOLVED</a>&#8221; almost  unanimously last week that it will &#8220;refuse&#8230; to implement the REAL ID Act&#8230;.&#8221;  As if that werenâ€™t enough, it &#8220;implores the United States Congress to repeal the  REAL ID Act&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><em>What?</em></p>
<p>Go ahead and re-read it.  Took me a few tries, too. Such stunningly good news knocks oneâ€™s comprehension  for a loop. Itâ€™s like sunshine at midnight: so freak a treat that one can only  blink and gibber. When was the last time we had news this good? Heck, when was  the last time we had good news, period, from the political world?</p>
<p>The <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:HR01268:@@@T">REAL ID  Act</a>, for those of you lacking the time and stomach to analyze Leviathanâ€™s  droppings, might better be titled &#8220;Papers, Please.&#8221; Passed in 2005, due to take  effect in 2008, it finishes the job of turning Amerika into a police state by  making driverâ€™s licenses into national ID cards.</p>
<p>The Act requires all  licenses to carry the same information, whether theyâ€™re issued in Alaska,  Florida, or somewhere in between. Those who concede that free people should ask  Their Rulersâ€™ permission before driving cars they own on roads they pay for  probably wonâ€™t object to providing their name, address, date of birth, gender, a  &#8220;digital photograph,&#8221; and their signature â€“ the usual data that good citizens  are conditioned to yield without thinking.</p>
<p>But then comes this  explosive little mandate: the license must also include &#8220;a common  machine-readable technology, with defined minimum data elements.&#8221; Who gets to  &#8220;define&#8221; those &#8220;elements&#8221;? The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), of course,  the busybodies who brought us airport screeners and the <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/10/05/60minutes/main2066624.shtml">infamous  No-Fly List</a>. Ergo, look for our new and improved licenses to feature <a href="http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1475">fingerprints and  a microchip </a>that tracks our movements. And, while the DHS is at it, why not  include our financial transactions (banks already report these anyway since the  Feds claim to recognize a terrorist by his moneybags), medical history (hey,  keeping tabs on the psychotics protects the rest of us), and the &#8220;<a href="http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/1104/111504c1.htm">passenger name records  (PNRâ€™s)</a>&#8221; airlines compile. The states must also &#8220;provide electronic access  to all other States to information contained in the motor vehicle database of  the State.&#8221; In other words, a national database puts everything at the Fedsâ€™  fingertips.</p>
<div style="padding-right: 5px; padding-top: 10px; float: left"><!--adsense--></div>
<p>A nightmare, right? But it  gets worse. Try obtaining or renewing a driverâ€™s license under REAL ID. Youâ€™ll  have to show four documents, everything from a birth certificate to a Social  Security card. Only Felix Unger and welfare mamas keep stuff like that around.  Then thereâ€™s the pleasure of paying for this: REAL ID is now priced at <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,127419-c,techrelatedlegislation/article.html">$11  billion</a>, over 100 times its original $100 million estimate. Those numbers  will continue climbing as more details are settled, more glitches detected.  Expect to pay hundreds of dollars for your new ID â€“ and higher state taxes, too.</p>
<p>The Feds will force us to  flash our licenses each time we interact with them â€“ when we board a plane (ha!  Thereâ€™s news!), enter a federal building (hmmm. Even jurors?), file legal  papers, or collect any sort of government payout. Even folks who donâ€™t drive  will need a license lest they become legal pariahs. And economic ones, too, as  the mania spreads. How else will retailers prove theyâ€™re patriotic Americans,  doing their part to catch terrorists, if they donâ€™t scrutinize our papers at  every transaction? It wonâ€™t be long until supermarkets ID us before selling so  much as a loaf of bread. Imagine the quandary of the poor sap whose license is  lost or stolen. And what about those whose licenses are suspended for speeding,  drunk driving&#8230; or, one fine day, for political dissent&#8230;?</p>
<p>Our Rulers claim REAL ID is  another tactic in the War on (Non-Governmental) Terror. But only Leviathan and  its cheerleaders in the Mainstream Media believe that papers protect us. Such  naÃ¯vetÃ© makes<a href="http://www.schneier.com/essay-034.html"> experts in  security </a>laugh. They realize that knowing the name of your attacker may add  a personal touch to your interaction but does zilch to keep you safe. Thatâ€™s why  God made guns and target practice, barbed wire, mace and self-defense classes,  window alarms, bullet-proof doors, and common sense: those things actually  protect us, all without asking the assailantâ€™s name first.</p>
<p>Expensive, ineffective,  totalitarian: no wonder Maineâ€™s legislature rejected REAL ID. We might ask why  they chose this particular expensive, ineffective, totalitarian measure out of  the boatload dumped on us the last few years, but letâ€™s not quibble. Nor is  Maine alone. <a href="http://www.lcsun-news.com/ci_5072842">New Mexicoâ€™s House  Majority Floor Leader</a> introduced a memorial denouncing REAL ID. A Republican  state representative in Montana sponsored a bill that &#8220;nullifies&#8221; REAL ID while  her Democratic colleagueâ€™s competing legislation &#8220;opposes&#8221; it. <a href="http://www.accessnorthga.com/news/ap_newfullstory.asp?ID=86479">The  Republican uttered words </a>seldom heard anywhere, at any time, in politics:  &#8220;She would have no problem, she said, if [the Democratâ€™s] bill passed and not  hers. â€˜It&#8217;s that important,â€™ she said.&#8221; Similar legislation is pending in <a href="http://www.columbian.com/news/localNews/01242007news96526.cfm">Washington  State</a>, <a href="http://news.com.com/2100-7348_3-6153532.html">Georgia, and  Massachusetts</a>.</p>
<p align="left">Back in Maine,<a href="http://www.public-cio.com/newsStory.php?id=2007.01.26-103580"> Senate  Majority Leader Libby Mitchell</a> believes that &#8220;&#8230;it is our job as state  Legislators to protect the people&#8230;from just this sort of dangerous federal  mandate.&#8221; <em>Bravissimo!</em> Better late than never.</p>
<p align="left"><em>Becky Akers  [<a href="mailto:libertatem@netzero.com">send her mail</a>] writes primarily  about the American Revolution.</em></p>
<p align="left">Copyright Â© 2007  LewRockwell.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/02/01/real-idiocy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

