With the nation in the midst of an economic crisis, many groups and individuals are questioning the massive spending and so-called economic stimulus bills recently passed by Congress. This includes bailouts and appropriations known as earmarks and pork-barrel spending. Since the constitutionality of federal spending is never part of the debate, we need to re-visit Congressâ€™ power to tax and spend.Details
by Rep Ron Paul
It has not been a good week for the Republic.Â It took quite a bit of trampling of the Constitution, but the bailout bill passed, as I suspected it would.
The bailout failed the first time it was brought to the House.Â Undaunted, the Senate pressed on by attaching the bailout as an amendment to another House passed bill that was pending in the Senate.Â The new bailout version had new taxes, so according to the Constitution it should not have originated in the Senate.Details
by Rep Ron Paul
Recently Congress passed the American Housing Rescue and Foreclosure Prevention Act., also known as the Housing Bill.Â Its passage was lauded by many who are legitimately concerned about foreclosures and the housing market in our country’s economy.Â I was asked how I could vote against a bill to help American homeowners, but I found this bill to have more to do with helping big banks than helping average Americans.
The answer is that there is more to any bill than its name or the headlines surrounding it.Â If one only paid attention to bill titles, one could happily vote for almost any bill put to a vote on the floor.Â Titles do not tell the complete story of a bill’s provisions, and many titles are downright deceptive and come close to emotional blackmail of legislators.
But we cannot afford to be fooled by fancy titles.ÂDetails