Comments on: Nullification and Racism

By: cptbanjo

cptbanjo — Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:25:44 +0000

“The states also reserved the power to interpret the constitution, and to reject legislation not deemed to be pursuant to that document’s original intent.”

Funny, my copy of the Constitution doesn’t say this. Instead, it says that the judicial power of the United States is vested in the federal judiciary.

Of course, the States can always reject legislation they deem to be unconstitutional. It’s called the amendment process.

By: alexfeo1971

alexfeo1971 — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 22:17:37 +0000

jiug09u nojfowjfiov jp89t94u5780gysoijdknvxfnoieqgeh89yhuqijngieruhnuqgiuajkbjmabiljehugp9uqh ruanjknlqjhiuthiuhuqhuhu428y huhu hu9h iuhgjkeaijgh iu

By: On that Ad Hominem, ‘Racist’ « economicharmonies

On that Ad Hominem, ‘Racist’ « economicharmonies — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:56:08 +0000

[...] trying to paint advocates with the broad brush of “racist,” here’s my latest Tenth Amendment Center article, which addresses both [...]

By: WilliamSchooler

WilliamSchooler — Sun, 20 Jan 2013 05:04:35 +0000

@onetenther
At My house and this state of being is free of rules and defined limits, its imagination unbound, it is lessons in abundance and it is growth by lessons because it allows them to be received each and everyone. The perfect lessons of life are total freedom and the top level is when you are willing to have even more lessons and more growth in all life. Each society is simply filled with each example and these don’t lie and teach us everything. When we agree to support life do we see free will in motion in support of itself to grow itself the way life IS.

By: onetenther

onetenther — Sun, 20 Jan 2013 03:06:51 +0000

I really believe that a wide recognition and acceptance of nullification would radically change our political machine. The idea that lower governments can tell higher governments N-O seems to solve the problem of politicians using their power to do things that are unexceptable to the people they govern. It changes how people view government in that its will is rejectable which makes people realize that government has to enact just laws over their lives because they won’t nullify laws against murder but will against ones that restrict our ability to speak freely. It begins to remove the mental shackles of government from our mind and makes people realize that their is an existence without government which is essential if they are to understand their rights exist naturally and are given to us by our creator (God). Without this concept of naturally occurring freedom we have no idea what the perfect state of freedom should look like which makes it hard for us to know when our rights are being unnecessarily being violated. Once we believe that society establishes the level of freedom we are to live by we only have other societies to compare our own established level of freedom to. Those societies also artificially established their own levels of freedom so where is the perfect state of freedom that we can all use to compare our own level of freedom to? It doesn’t exist if we believe our rights come by the law and not by our creation.

By: WilliamSchooler

WilliamSchooler — Sat, 19 Jan 2013 22:52:19 +0000

@Monorprise
And that is why you look at the way you do and is why I pointed out your example. This is where we take language and make it some authorization, something you are very used to doing, as well was I but have since realized there is no written authorization and my own connection authorizes me to null and void an other placing or claiming authority over me. I know first hand my creator did not and other saying this is not true is only true for them and not for me. I was authorized full choice ability and no other choice may supersede mine unless I go against life through actions. All life supporting actions have as much authorization as all other authorization and those saying they have more made it up in all cases and is the reason it is here at all.

To Live nullification is a choice you make and you have to know what you are able to nullify, it is many of you making up all theses rules to keep rules in place and none have this authority, Life is a natural state, living it is a another natural state, deciding for it is another natural state and nullifying acts against my nature is a natural act. So which part of nature is this not the case?

Since Life is all of Nature and that is Galaxy wide and I am a part of that system that has been here billions of years, how can it all be wrong and those who have been here less that 100 years know far more than I, their books were all written and the Galaxy has only grown in all that time, what am I missing?

By: Monorprise

Monorprise — Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:15:01 +0000

@WilliamSchooler
To put it more plainly nullification is not a law written it is the recognition and resistance to a law or act unauthorized in the written Constitution of said body.

In this I of course recognize that you are 100% correct. But I was attempting to frame the argument from the point of view of he who sees the mere power to refuse as an affirmative power of abuses. (Something that is argued for by the leaders of the left as a matter of faith).

I would not however call nullification itself as a product of natural law but rather it’s clearly an obligation of Constitutional law.

The natural law equivalent of nullification is an entirely different obligation in which men are bound by their higher constitutions before God to resist and refuse an unauthorizedable written Constitution of man.

By: WilliamSchooler

WilliamSchooler — Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:36:51 +0000

@Monorprise
Here is one of the limited views of Nullification because it has laws and restrictions and all this made up stuff. States and Washington are the least of our worries since WE are all the heart of this matter and have full authority to Nullify any act of authorization that restricts, inhibits or declines life to support itself.

Nullification is not a law written, it is a law of nature that is required in the presence of imposition by bad dominant forces.

By: WilliamSchooler

WilliamSchooler — Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:31:10 +0000

Very interesting analogy and it is funny to me how we point out the abuses but I have yet to see the real value by its terms, to nullify, to cause something to not be cause any more. Yet, we only apply this to Government only and means to get rid of some law some bone heads created for their cause rather than yours.

So what is your cause exactly? This is the part that is missing no one dare speaks of because it is up close and personal.
My cause is Life support in all ways, so if some imposition enters in that goes against my actions of life support I have full authority by my own choice to null it, make it not exist, to refuse it, to not acknowledge it has any value to you at all.

Since all Value is life related, the true value must prop life up, allow it, strengthen it, to grow it and to decide and to agree with it in the direction of the ONE support that of LIFE support or the one life.

Here is the issue, like you so many go to school and think all this relates to what they teach you rather than understand all teachings directly relate to life, “you” and its support or its denial. All Life is one and you can see this looking at your own planet, its one ball of life, in a system of life surrounded by energy, life energy no less.

The Declaration of Independence was the only Document to point out this fact, is entirely miss understood, not applied at all and has everything to do with every life on this planet and was defined as so. It can also be seen not to be used in our Constitution at many points by this fact. The acts that support Government are false and is why the separation was created and declared. All acts for life support were intended towards that means. In other words All acts to limit Government were in fact Liberty which is a life supporting activity. So when we have laws supporting false authority do we have actions against life support and these are to be NULL and VOID in all cases, whether state or federal, if all lived by these terms given them in the Declaration of Independence. In fact this document has the foremost informing of Nullification by declaration of this state as well the cause of such a nullification and is to be announce to a just world, meaning Life supporting life because these are the just people of the world and those controlling it, destroying it, lying to it, raping it and molesting it are the pedophiles to our own existence and need to be NULL and VOID of any authority at all.

Tell these folks in school stop publishing books and live a little, go visit nature, look at the night sky and see first hand how all life works together to support itself because it is One big life and we are only a part in this life. Actions of support are done by the part “you” in all cases for no other has authority over. This intends you are responsible to recognize you as this whole life and you in it supporting its whole.

Yep it sucks to be me, as well to be you because Responsibility is as big as our Galaxy and all the life and all the parts that comprise it. Yet we figure out and argue over nullifying some broken law some small spec invented in his mind not to support life and then play with each other about it.

Well I highly suggest and only suggest you reread the Declaration of Independence both the original draft and the final declaration and make LIFE the most important part of this document and then show me what Nullification really means. First throw out every thing you learned and look at you as Living, being Life and what acts would support you and then read it as you are in that very state and tell me it says the same thing you thought it said before. May you never ever be the same again.

By: Monorprise

Monorprise — Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:29:45 +0000

The assertion is as ridiculous as it is common. Washington is just as capable of doing evil as any state legislator. The only difference is when Washington does evil to any minority, that same minority cannot liberate themselves by way of a simple vote with their feet.

Nullification is a tool like most any other it can be used for good or bad. The only difference between it and the tool of imperial power is that the tool of nullification is limited in its geographical scope. This limitation provides an abused minority an opportunity to free themselves that they could not have were the abuses the subject of an imperial power that is Washington’s.

To take the acts of one small handful of states as evidence of untrustworthiness is no different than to take the acts of a one small handful of thieves as evidence of the unworthlyness of all men to be free. There are bad apples everywhere and they are as common in Washington as they are in each individual state legislator. You are simply 50 times more likely to find an examples of their expression in the legislators because there are 50 times more legislators to begin with.

To extend that practice upwards instead of downwards you should expand your search for examples of bad apples to all the governments of the world, where you will find more than a few quite horrific ones. Should the United States lose its ability to govern itself on the account of these bad government’s?