Ten States Voting on Nullification Measures this Week

  • Share on Tumblr

Just hours before election day, the TV airways are abuzz with presidential and Congressional campaign messages.  But around the country, some of the most important votes won’t be cast for president, senate, or house.  They won’t be cast for a governor, or even a state representative.

In ten states – Colorado, Montana, Oregon, Washington, Wyoming, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Massachusetts and Alabama – voters will get a chance to resist DC and approve ballot initiatives which would nullify unconstitutional federal acts.

Here’s a brief rundown of the nine, a YES vote is urged on each.

1.  Montana, Referendum 122
LR-122 is an act “prohibiting the state or federal government from mandating the purchase of health insurance.”  It would also prohibit the imposition of “penalties for decisions related to the purchase of health insurance coverage.”

Recent polls show 50% in favor and 41% opposed.  It requires a majority for approval.

2.  Massachusetts, Question 3
All three branches of the federal government consider the possession, production, sale and consumption of the plant, “marijuana” to be illegal.  17 states are already defying that classification by allowing its use for medicinal purposes.  A YES VOTE  on Question 3 would “enact the proposed law eliminating state criminal and civil penalties related to the medical use of marijuana, allowing patients meeting certain conditions to obtain marijuana produced and distributed by new state-regulated centers or, in specific hardship cases, to grow marijuana for their own use.”

It has polled as high at 68% in recent weeks.  The 18th state to nullify federal laws on weed is likely to do it in a landslide.

3.  Alabama, Amendment 6
This legislatively-referred amendment would free Alabama citizens from any requirement to participate in Obamacare, or any other compulsory health care program.The ballot language reads as follows:

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, to prohibit any person, employer, or health care provider from being compelled to participate in any health care system.

If passed, the amendment would place the onus on the Alabama legislature and executive branch to block implementation of the PPACA and shield their citizens from federal mandates.  The proposed amendment had to garner a 60 percent majority in both the House and the Senate to go to the voters.  A simple majority on Nov. 6 will approve the amendment.

4.  Oregon, Measure 80
Oregon was the first state to allow women to vote, and supporters liken the push for Measure 80 to that same kind of pioneering spirit.  This ballot initiative directly attacks not one, but two federally-banned products – both marijuana and industrial hemp. (the latter being a related plant without THC and used in everything from oil, to food, clothing and more).

The official ballot title is: Allows personal marijuana, hemp cultivation/use without license; commission to regulate commercial marijuana cultivation/sale.

5.  Colorado, Amendment 64
Section 3 would allow the “personal use and regulation of marijuana” for adults 21 and over. Section 4 addresses legal commercial cultivation, manufacture, and sale. The intent is that marijuana be regulated in a manner similar to alcohol.

Polls have shown support strong to gaining, with the latest ranging around 53% in favor and 43% opposed.  It is likely that Colorado will be the nation’s first (or second, read below) state to not only nullify federal marijuana laws for medical purposes – but for the general public as well.

6.  Wyoming, Amendment A
Wyoming voters will consider a health care freedom amendment to the Declaration of Rights in the state constitution on Nov. 6.

If Amendment A garners a 50 percent majority, the Wyoming Constitution will guarantee citizens of the state the right to make their own healthcare decisions with minimal governmental interference.

Article 1, Section 38 – Right of Health Care Access

(a) Each competent adult shall have the right to make his or her own health care decisions.  The parent, guardian or legal representative of any other natural person shall have the right to make health care decisions for that person.

(b) Any person may pay, and a health care provider may accept, direct payment for health care without imposition of penalties or fines for doing so.

7.  Washington State, Initiative 502
Whatever you call the plant, Washington DC considers it dangerous and illegal. Laws on the books in Congress – illegal. The executive branch – aggressive about enforcing those laws. The supreme court – in 2005 ruled against the idea of states legalizing for any purpose.

But yet, 17 states have been standing up and defying DC on this issue by legalizing marijuana for limited medicinal purposes. Massachusetts voters are set to become the 18th state as Question 3 should win by a landslide.

If approved, Washington’s I-502 would take it a step further. It would end marijuana prohibition and treat pot in the same manner as alcohol. People would be allowed to grow, produce, sell, buy and consume the plant – in direct defiance to all three branches of the federal government.

Recent polls all show support ranging from 55-56% in favor with opposition in only the high 30s.

8. Arkansas, Issue 5
The second state to consider a new medical marijuana program this year.  Issue 5 would make “the medical use of marijuana legal under Arkansas State Law, and establishing a system for the cultivation, acquisition and distribution of marijuana for qualifying patients through nonprofit medical marijuana dispensaries and granting those nonprofit dispensaries limited immunity”

9.  Florida, Amendment 1
Florida voters will have the opportunity to tell the feds to go pound the plentiful Sunshine State sand on Nov. 6 when they consider Amendment 1, a health care freedom amendment.

If passed, the amendment will “prohibit laws or rules from compelling any person or employer to purchase, obtain, or otherwise provide for health care coverage.” The proposed amendment would also allow health care providers to accept direct payment for services.

Call it a tax or call it a penalty, in effect, the amendment would nullify the insurance mandate written into the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

10. Arizona, Proposition 120
The measure would declare state sovereignty over the state’s natural resources based on the argument of “equal footing.” Natural resources would include land, air, water, minerals and wildlife

*******

EDITOR’S NOTE:  Don’t live in one of these states and want to help advance the cause of the Constitution and your liberty?  Take these actions:

1.  Read up on other steps you can take HERE
2.  VOLUNTEER to lead, blog, or get active in various ways
3.  Consider a MEMBERSHIP to the Tenth Amendment Center to help us continue our work

About Michael Boldin

Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA. Follow him on twitter - @michaelboldin, on LinkedIn, and on Facebook.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?
20 comments
JoAnneHarrison
JoAnneHarrison

You do realize this will never happen, right?

JamesP.Delaney
JamesP.Delaney

 @JoAnneHarrison

 Sadly, you're probably right. Our entire system has been corrupted, and all levels of government have either abandoned or are ignorant of the Constitution and the 10th Amendment. REMEDY: TPers and other patriotic organizations should immediately organize,. link up and march on your State capitals to press the point. By nature, politicians are cowards, cautious. Get in their face big time and they will "see the light" and take a principled, constitutional stance.

Reenit
Reenit

America is Beautiful, Majestic & Free only because Brave & Unselfish Men & Women likeU Chose 2Serve Her. ThankU #HonorVets @JoeHaisley

hogup350
hogup350

Oregon was not the first state to allow women to vote! It was Wyoming in 1869  and Utah allowed women to vote as a territory in 1870 Oregon allowed women to vote in 1912

peggyjames
peggyjames

if these proposals work, then each state should divorce it's self from the federal government and not expect FEMA or any other benefits by belonging to the "United" States.  They should become like an Island and not scream for help when disaster strikes.

 

FredMarsico
FredMarsico

 @peggyjames This is true, but also they will not be paying taxes to the federal government (neither would the residents) and they will then have the funds to support their win needs within the State.

 

That is why our founders did not want a federal direct taxation system. That did not come about until the unconstitutional Federal Reserve Act and  the amendment that changed the wording of apportionment of taxes to allow direct taxation of the individual.

 

Prior to that act and amendment, we paid no federal income tax nor state taxes on wages. Taxes were collected from businesses and only on profits. As the most prosperous nation in the world with the strongest defenses, are taxes were minimal at best.

JosephSDeasonJr
JosephSDeasonJr like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @peggyjames When Katrina hit the South, it was individuals from the closest states that came to their aid first. Church's, Schools and Business across the South Raised Money and  gathered food to take to the Victims of Katrina weeks before FEMA even showed up. I watched the News as Wal-Mart and hundred of Other Trucks Delivered Food and Water to the people and there were Groups of People delivering Water and food, with their Church Tee-shirts on.  The Government would not allow the School bus's to go around the cities and Pick up people and take them to shelters. All of it was Sad, but the Government just talked and pointed fingers at each other for almost 3 weeks.

JamesP.Delaney
JamesP.Delaney like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @peggyjames

 peggyjames,

Dependency, by people or State governments, always breeds servitude.

PattyRoe
PattyRoe

They should've had it on the ballot we just voted on!!!!  Shows where their loyalities lie!

daveufirst
daveufirst like.author.displayName 1 Like

Nice. I sent to my state senators and reps--although they are not now in session.

Monorprise
Monorprise like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

God willing, our resistance to tyranny will go forward by whatever means we have available.

Charlie Peters
Charlie Peters

California, Obama / Mitt, November contest would likely give the California winner prize to Obama but how would a 3 way Obama, Mitt & Ron write in vote count end up? RP votes in 2008 were counted.

 

The Goldman Sacs / Fed reserve / GMO food-fuel twins might create a fun contest with the Texas Dr. Ron Paul & Judge Napolitano.

 

Auit the fed, support HR 459 Paul & S 202 Paul

 

Is this game about D R or other? maybe it is about saving the republic. Maybe Obama and Mitt are the underdogs.

JamesP.Delaney
JamesP.Delaney like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

AZ's nullification effort is far and away the most consequential. Imagine a State asserting its sovereign control over its land and resources. Amazing. Sure hope AZ doesn't back off. The fed's control over American real estate is grossly unconstitutional. Finally, fed lawlessness is being challenged! FINALLY! OH, and don't forget AZ, you are in charge, not any unelected, unaccountable, federal court. Don't let the courts undo your fine efforts!

Michael Boldin
Michael Boldin moderator

@JamesP.Delaney Thanks for the feedback, James...good to see you here! We are hoping to post an early blog tomorrow with more detail on Arizona too. Blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com

JoseGonzales1
JoseGonzales1 like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @JamesP.Delaney The globalists are not going to be very happy if it passes.  The United Nations is in the process of asserting its authority over state resources.

 

Monorprise
Monorprise

 @JoseGonzales1  @JamesP.Delaney 

Elections have consequences mister John Roberts,  But I suppose that is only the case when he agrees with them.

 

It is my bet that the Federal employees in black robes will deem the people of Arizona once again unfit to rule their state on the same fitting as the people of the eastern states(who actually have solverin possession over their own land & resources).

 

Equal footing, like every other clause of the Federal Constitution according to them only means what they dictate it to mean and thus it means nothing at all against their carefully appointed interest.  

 

Still we should not underestimate the value of proclaiming our rights in law to appeal to the natural senses of justice to the people of theses "united" states and the world, even as the same appeal falls deaf upon the self-serving ears of Washington D.C.   Let those hypocrites be exposed to the world for what they are, and tied in their hands justly all the same.

 

 

You cannot proclaim the virtues of freedom,  self-government, and constitutional law while practicing it not at home.  You cannot be taken seriously as a patriot while welding the hammer of a tyrant.

 

Perhaps in their own self-serving vanity they might find it equable to give up some of their unneeded and unfair control at home so that they might find the international clothing they wish to wear "less exposing".

AndrewNappi
AndrewNappi

Here is a clear and concise appraisal of Florida's Amendment One. 

"Amendment 1 Health Care Services[1]:  (This amendment will add another section to the Constitution)  

This legislation is simply the people engaging in the right of the people to nullify unconstitutional federal law. (See Federalist Papers 33 & 64)  If this amendment passes, it could provide the state government with the courage necessary to facilitate the real solution: the governor and legislators to nullify this unconstitutional law through legislation. However, if it fails, it could have the opposite effect, which would be very bad.

 

Let’s look at what a YES vote will accomplish…

Would represent the expressed desire of Floridians to opt out of federal health care reform requirements.This would be an expression in support of nullification by the people of Florida.This may serve to embolden the Governor and the legislature to stand against the Healthcare Act as unconstitutional and support Liberty and work toward a state free from federal control.Would add language to the Florida Constitution some could argue is unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution if determined by the courts to be in conflict with federal law.This assertion presented in this type of law suit would be based upon an improper interpretation of the Supremacy Clause.  In this circumstance, standing for what is constitutional and what is a true reflection of liberty is worth the chance of a law suit.Would prevent the Florida Legislature from passing health care coverage mandates."-http://www.krisannehall.com/index.php/blog/135-florida-voter-guide

Trackbacks

  1. [...] amendment would free Alabama citizens from any requirementRead the rest of this article at: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/04/nine-states-voting-on-nullification-measures-this-week/ Click "Home" to find this article in English. Clic "Inicio" para encontrar este artículo en [...]

  2. [...] amendment would free Alabama citizens from anyRead the rest of this article at: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/04/nine-states-voting-on-nullification-measures-this-week/ Click "Home" to find this article in English. Clic "Inicio" para encontrar este artículo en [...]

  3. [...] LR-122 is an act “prohibiting the state or federal government from mandating the purchase of health insurance.” It would also prohibit the imposition of “penalties for decisions related to the purchase of health insurance coverage.” Recent polls show … Read more on Tenth Amendment Center [...]

  4. [...] Ten States Voting to Secede from the Union… This entry was posted by fakedrudge. /* [...]

  5. [...] power from D.C……again, WITHOUT ASKING PERMISSION FROM D.C. Here is a link to the specifics: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012…ek/#more-13303 And this is just the events/efforts taking place tomorrow. This process has been on going, and [...]

  6. [...] States Voting on Nullification Measures this Week Ten States Voting on Nullification Measures this Week – Tenth Amendment Center Brave states…I applaud them for doing what's right for their [...]

  7. [...] to a report compiled by the Tenth Amendment Center, which works to remind Americans that the federal government is supposed to be a limited [...]

  8. [...] Michael Boldin: Ten States Voting on Nullification Measures Today [...]

  9. [...] Ten States Voting on Nullification Measures [...]

  10. [...] Boldin Tenth Amendment Center November 6, 2012 Share Tweet (function() { var li = [...]

  11. [...] more: Ten States Voting on Nullification Measures this Week – Tenth Amendment Center. November 6th, 2012 | Category: Uncategorized | Leave a comment | [...]

  12. [...] Nine States Voting on Nullification Measures this Week (tenthamendmentcenter.com) [...]