If the Feds Won’t Stop the TSA, the States Should

“It’s time to END the TSA and get the government’s hands back to only stealing our wallets instead of groping toddlers and grandmothers.” – Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.)

I couldn’t agree more.

I worked in the airline industry beginning in 2001 and experienced first-hand the creation and growth of the TSA. When it started, the aim was simply to standardize security and provide a more “professional” airport security screening force. The dirty secret was that most of the new pros were simply the old “amateurs,” the same screeners wearing fancy new federal uniforms and earning more money.

But over the 10-plus years of its existence, the TSA grew like some mutated leviathan on steroids. Today the TSA employs nearly 60,000 people. In its first year, the TSA budget stood at a modest $1.3 billion. The 2012 budget called on the agency to spend some $8.1 billion.

It not only grew in physical size. Initially, screeners contented themselves with confiscating pilot’s nail clippers and lighters to “keep us safe.” True story. Saw it happen more than once. In fact, I witnessed a TSA supervisor refuse to allow a pilot through the checkpoint when he reminded a surly screener taking his nail clippers that he didn’t need them to crash the plane. You’ve gotta admit – he had a point. So they couldn’t let him fly the plane. Pointy objects  forbidden, you know.

Then we had the shoe bomber. Within weeks, the newly minted TSA slammed the barn door shut with the horses  standing comfortably outside, decreeing every passenger must remove her or his shoes before boarding a flight. Almost 11 years later, we still enjoy the privilege of spending a few intimate pre-flight moments queued up  in our stocking feet with complete strangers.

Fast forward to today, when every airline passenger risks sexual assault every time she runs the TSA security gamut. Nowadays they let us keep our nail clippers, but don’t think you will get on a plane without some badged goon grabbing your crotch, and for you ladies – offering a nice squeeze of you boobie.

Lest you accuse me of exaggerating, here is just one report filed with the ACLU by a female passenger.

“In the four times she explored the area where my inner thigh met my crotch, she touched my labia each time, and one pass made contact with my clitoris, through two layers of clothing. I told her I felt humiliated, assaulted and abused … In my work as a nurse, if I did what the TSA did against a patient’s will it would be considered assault and battery, and I did not see how the TSA should have different rules.”

Of course, you might not get groped if you choose to let them irradiate you and have a little peek instead. Supposedly, they changed the scanner settings from a full naked image of the passenger to a generic outline. But that didn’t stop some TSA pervs in Dallas from allegedly asking female passengers to walk through multiple times so they could admire their “cute figures.”

“I feel like I was totally exposed,” Ellen Terrell told a Dallas CBS News affiliate. “They wanted a nice good look.”

In the old days, when I used to complain about Fourth Amendment and basic civil liberty violations committed by the TSA on a daily basis, I would get the old, “If you don’t like it, don’t fly,” retort. In fact, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano basically told Americans that very thing back in 2010 when people started raising a fuss over the increasingly intrusive screening procedures, saying if they want to travel by other means, they have that right.

Unless, of course, “other means” includes riding the bus, taking the train of driving along the interstate highway system. Over the last two years, the TSA has made its presence known in those places as well.  On Friday, April 13th, unlucky passengers at a Houston, Texas bus depot got an unpleasant surprise. A TSA VIPR team descended on the area. Federal agents, along with state and local police, conducted random bag inspections, and guided bomb and drug sniffing dogs among all of those passengers choosing to take the bus instead of fly. Just one month earlier, a VIPR team showed up at the Alton, Ill. Amtrak station.

“We refer to these as VIPR operations; that stands for visual intermodal protection and response,” TSA spokesman Jim Fotenos said. “It was not in response to a specific threat.”

Fotenos went on to say the agency conducts “thousands” of similar operations every year. Just last year, the TSA conducted searches along interstates in Tennessee.

I guess by “other means” sister Janet means walking along the sidewalk. Maybe.

On a side note, one has to wonders what searching for drugs has to do with keeping us safe from terrorists, but I’m probably not supposed to ask that question.

Guardian columnist Jennifer Abel came up with a pretty good description of the Homeland Security mantra.

“Show us your papers, show us everything you’ve got, justify yourself or you’re not allowed to go about your everyday business.”

Apparently, it’s not just for illegal immigrants any more.

And are we really any safer for all of this intrusiveness? I question it. Having worked in the airline industry, I can tell you first-hand about the incompetency of the TSA. If they ever really did catch a terrorist or unravel a nefarious plot, it was purely accidental. And there’s no evidence that they ever have.

So yes, Sen. Paul,  we need to get rid of the TSA. He has a plan to do it, and I commend him for his efforts.

But let’s be realistic.

It’s not going to happen.

When was the last time you ever saw a huge government bureaucracy just go away? When was the last time the federal government every voluntarily gave up power? Ummm, last I can recall – never.

As the Christian Science Monitor said, the chance of Paul actually ending the TSA is “about the same as his unsuccessful amendment to the postal reform bill that would have ended government tyranny over individual mailboxes.”

If we truly want to end TSA tyranny, it will have to come down to the states. State legislatures possess the power to rein in the most intrusive TSA procedures. When an agent gropes a woman’s crotch, arrest the agent and charge her with sexual assault. Make it illegal to require unconstitutional searches in order to access public facilities or transportation within a state. Refuse state and local cooperation with the VIPR teams.

If the TSA won’t stop…make them stop.

Become a member and support the TAC!

The Tenth Amendment Center wrote model legislation called the Travel Freedom Act that protects the rights and dignity of the people. Contact your lawmakers and urge them to file this legislation. Then work to get it passed in your state. If one state takes the lead, others will follow. And if enough states simply say, “No! We will not permit this.” The policies will change.

But if we do nothing, it won’t be long before VIPR teams make a visit to your neighborhood sidewalk. After all, the terrorist could be walking along there.

And they must keep us safe.

“Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.” – Frederick Douglass

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?
22 comments
IronMike76
IronMike76

LOL...in 5 minutes looked up the radiation levels of the TSA machinery and found out that flying at 30,000 ft provides you with several times that amount. 5 minutes. The new scanners don't even use x-rays. I also discovered that the tin-foil hat crowd controls the discussion on the matter. No facts. No experts. No logic. Just paranoia and fear-mongering. Now...I hope you don't do what most of that ilk do when they don't have a clue: go the ad hominem route and hurl insults and attack my character. Better yet, go ahead and do what you do best. You dont  know me and I don't care. 

IronMike76
IronMike76

Your figures are misleading. $1.3B was FY 2001 budget after start-up. Needless to say, a sustaining annual budget is quite a bit higher. The world is full of "horror" stories - especially when pissed-off passengers have to stand in line. And you feed the fury with sensationalism. They're pissed-off when they pick up their latte. I've stood  in HUNDREDS of security lines since 9-11 and can count my bad experiences on one hand. PASSENGERS, on the other hand are, as a group, some of the most ignorant, arbitrary and contentious people on the planet - largely as a result of articles like yours. But Americans are.just plain mad whenever anyone asks them to do anything. 

 

Find another whipping boy. This is boring. The SCOTUS has adjudicated administrative searches ad nauseum and has concluded that they are constitutional...and wise. I want TSA, the airlines want TSA, the airports want TSA and a large majority of the citizens want TSA. Stop whining.

Mike Maharrey
Mike Maharrey moderator like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @IronMike76 SCOTUS also said, "The question before us is, whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement [people of Aftican (sic) ancestry] compose a portion of this people, and are constituent members of this sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word ‘citizens’ in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States. On the contrary, they were at that time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of beings, who had been subjugated by the dominant race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges but such as those who held the power and the Government might choose to grant them."Needless to say, I'm not real impressed with "what SCOTUS says."T

 

IronMike76
IronMike76

 @MikeMaharrey-TenthAmendment So...you recommend no SCOTUS? Just curious as to whom you believe should be the final adjudicator on matters of the law. You? I'm up for a little "survival of the fittest." Bring on the anarchy.

IronMike76
IronMike76

 @RedTulie  @MikeMaharrey-TenthAmendment  answer my question: yes on a SCOTUS or no? I really can't compare a few hours in an airport every year (your "police state") with doing away with the federal judiciary. 

TentherX
TentherX like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @IronMike76 Obviously, IronMike76 has no clue about how dangerous the X-ray body scanners are and that the latest Underwear Bomb Scandal is a false flag plot, in a long line of false flags, to make people submit and to subject them to the body scanners. The TSA may be replaced by private security companies, and safety will improve.  IronMike76 is the kind of guy who wants to live on his knees.  And get invasive pat-downs.  He should be trolling other websites.  "Those who would sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither"- Benjamin Franklin.

IronMike76
IronMike76

 @TentherX  Live on my knees? How little you know about me! Private companies ran airport security prior to 9-11. Nuff said. Several airports have opted-in to private aviation security since 9-11 (San Fran and Kansas City to name two). No change. And, in all my years, have never required a pat-down. You see, I'm smart enough to comply with some pretty elementary requirements and I show a little respect for people doing a really tough job. I'm in and out in a matter of minutes. What I have observed on occasion though are arbitrarily uncooperative people who make life miserable for the rest of us. Fly out of Ben Gurion and try to pull some of the stunts people pull here. 

IronMike76
IronMike76

 @BobCompton LOL...like I  said, follow the rules. I have yet to have a problem. Nobody "saves" any images of you. And those TSA screeners probably have a better background than you. Are there bad ones? Sure. Are there bad cops? You bet. Are there bad soldiers? Yep. And guess what? TSA finds dangerous weapons on passengers every day. A Glock 19 with two full mags was discovered today in Florida - in a security checkpoint.

 

When was the last time you flew into Tel Aviv? I can guarantee you that you will be subjected to MUCH more "humiliation" at Ben Gurion than anywhere in the US because (now take note) THEY DON'T TRUST YOU. They don't trust anyone...especially foreigners. And do you know who gives them the most grief? Americans "demanding their rights." LOL...can you imagine? I can. I've seen it. ...and off they go to some "back room" for a interrogation and/or strip search. The same kind of whiny people who can't follow simple directions and jam up the works here with their attitudes.

 

Check out the new body scanners. Radio-frequency (no xrays, no images) that have been in airports for the last year. No doubt y'all will hate them because you'll be denied your traditional "right to bitch."

BobCompton
BobCompton

 @IronMike76 You leave a penny in your pocket when you empty your pockets to go through the metal scanner gate, and you're pulled over for "the treatment". There's no going back through for a re-check.  You WILL have to go through either the x-ray machine or the pat-down. If instead you say that you will just not fly at all, you still have to go through one or the other.  The verdict is still out as to whether the x-ray machines are dangerous, or can be if they malfunction. The humiliation of having your "junk" immortalized in TSA's computer cannot be measured, nor should it have to be. In the whole time that TSA has been taking their porno pictures and sexually groping passengers, many of whom were chosen because of their attractiveness, not a single weapon of any kind has been detected at any airport in the US. The 4th amendment does not say, "except by TSA". I guarantee you that if pelosi, boxer, wasserman-schultz, et al had to go through the groping a few times, it would end. You  spoke of Ben Gurion airport. They do not have this BS to contend with, and their risk is immeasurably higher than ours. What is your response to that?

RedTulie
RedTulie

 @IronMike76 Yeah, I'm one of those pissed off people.  I want the hell to be left alone.  I want my government to do its minuscule job and stop raping us on a daily basis.  I want my rights (and those of others) to be respected.  I am sick to death of being continually legislated--unlawfully--with no more corners left to back into.  I am sick of permits for this, licenses for that, regulations for breathing, having my once clean food supply to be left alone so that we can eat decently.  I want the medical mafia, in collusion with said government, to stop killing and maiming our children with every horrendous sickness and damage under the sun.  And, speaking of the sun, I want whoever is screwing with my ability to enjoy the sun and increase my health, to stop shi**ing up the skies with toxic crap that we are forced to breathe in and is changing the pH of our soil.  I could go on but suffice it to say that things are so out of hand that we really do not have a government but a dictatorship by big biz and the slimy white shoe political boys and it needs to stop.

 

Enjoy the sexual assaults and irradiation via the TSA.

CarlPettis
CarlPettis like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @IronMike76 You are soooo full of what Bess Truman tried to get Harry to call manure.

Everitt Mickey
Everitt Mickey

START with eliminating the TSA...and go from there. There are a whole lot of other Federal organizations which don't need to exist.

Chuck Gould
Chuck Gould

I made them pat me down .... hee hee hee ... just because I could make em do it!

Susan Godby
Susan Godby

The sooner, the better!! States Sovereignty over our screwed up Govt.

Alfy Chavez
Alfy Chavez

It's about to get worse with the new "al-qaeda underwear bomb" the cia " found".

Tom Rankin
Tom Rankin

The States have to do it. —“recall the federal government to its constitutional limits.” It is the purpose and function of the State Government to protect its citizens from unconstitutional acts of the Federal Government. Citizens cannot effectively stand up to the Federal Government but the STATES CAN.

Trackbacks