Comments on: The Rule of Law

By: WilliamSchooler

WilliamSchooler — Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:23:50 +0000

@onetenther
This is partially true but the ultimate authority is the choice I make and this can be based on principals of a deity or of complete stupidity. The only thing that will take place is what was chosen. Those pretending authority over simply decide they will and so they follow through with activities promoting such a bad choice. The total choice is self determined and no more. I can put in as much garbage as I want or as many truths as I choose to look at and I will decide based on such.

Now the Rule of Life is; life to live such a life is it not? And this natural law is only defied by the choices I make, if I choose to control others or destroy others by my own choices will go against my own nature to live. This being a very bad choice does not support the rule of life or life to rule its own choice. Life is the full bottom line factor of the choice, to have life or dispose of life and the rule is life that loves living and promotes itself as living by doing acts in support of itself and not the destruction of itself and this is in all honesty. Who out there wants to die? Not very many, why?

So the Rule of Law becomes the Rule that allows and preserves this life and sometimes has some enforcement to stop others from destroying others because all have authority to destroy themselves but not that of others because this goes against my own personal choice to live such a life.

This is the only clear line, to live and promote this activity or to defy such a choice. Making up anything else over and above is making it up.

God does not get to decide for me, I get to decide for god whether or not I promote those views or that philosophy or way of life thus the freedom of Religion is given by such a choice and such an authority by such choice.

When we finally realize we have no more authority than our own choice, when we recognize not one idea takes place without such a choice do we realize ourselves, our abilities and or own authority to rule our own actions and with this cause comes the responsibility of all our actions we decide upon. It is the results of these we put on display and the truths then become told don’t they?

By: WilliamSchooler

WilliamSchooler — Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:23:50 +0000

By: WilliamSchooler

WilliamSchooler — Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:18:18 +0000

@onetenther
This is partially true but the ultimate authority is the choice I make and this can be based on principals of a deity or of complete stupidity. The only thing that will take place is what was chosen. Those pretending authority over simply decide they will and so they follow through with activities promoting such a bad choice. The total choice is self determined and no more. I can put in as much garbage as I want or as many truths as I choose to look at and I will decide based on such.

Now the Rule of Life is; life to live such a life is it not? And this natural law is only defied by the choices I make, if I choose to control others or destroy others by my own choices will go against my own nature to live. This being a very bad choice does not support the rule of life or life to rule its own choice. Life is the full bottom line factor of the choice, to have life or dispose of life and the rule is life that loves living and promotes itself as living by doing acts in support of itself and not the destruction of itself and this is in all honesty. Who out there wants to die? Not very many, why?

So the Rule of Law because the Rule that allows and preserves this life and sometimes has some enforcement to stop others from destroying others because all have authority to destroy themselves but not that of others because this goes against my own personal choice to live such a life.

This is the only clear line, to live and promote this activity or to defy such a choice. Making up anything else over and above is making it up.

God does not get to decide for me, I get to decide for god whether or not I promote those views or that philosophy or way of life thus the freedom of Religion is given by such a choice and such an authority by such choice.

When we finally realize we have no more authority than our own choice, when we recognize not one idea takes place without such a choice do we realize ourselves, our abilities and or own authority to rule our own actions and with this cause comes the responsibility of all our actions we decide upon. It is the results of these we put on display and the truths then become told don’t they?

By: onetenther

onetenther — Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:30:16 +0000

I would like to point out that the rule of law is actually a preferred alternative to being ruled by other people. There are two kinds of political authority which is laws and persons and if we put political authority in the hands of a person then we are governed by a dictatorship. This violates the concept that all men are created equal so we choose the alternative of being ruled by laws.   A dictator could actually rule in such a way that would preserve a great deal of freedom but that would violate any sense of equality that exist between people so we choose to be ruled by laws but even laws can take away more freedom than we want them to. They natural question then becomes why would that become the preferred alternative. The answer is in order to preserve the idea that no person can fall under the jurisdiction of another person’s personal authority.

Now laws are not the ultimate authority because the ultimate authority is the person themselves and whatever deity (assuming they believe in one) they choose to worship.   Ala given rights is the same thing as God-given rights in the sense that a person’s ultimate authority is cemented in that deity that they choose to worship. It is not cemented in the state even one that is governed by laws because a law that compels us to commit suicide would always run into the natural will to live that has been cemented into us by the creator (GOd, Ala, or the evolutionary process). Our natural will would compel us to resist such a law which indicates that natural rights has at least as much authority as the state. This is why the state can not have absolute authority over any person because whenever a law or direct order from a dictator attempts to compel us to do something that would harm ourselves and our own interest our natural will will resist as much as it can.

In fact, this is probably true of all human relationships because a controlling husband may have gained a lot of power over his wife but even he knows he can not tell her to kill herself.   He knows that there are certain limits to how much authority the wife would cede to her husband for the simple reason of human beings will not commit suicide voluntarily so they will not cede that power to anyone.

By: Jonelle's Page

Jonelle's Page — Fri, 09 Mar 2012 05:33:36 +0000

“When we take an oath to the U.S. Constitution, to uphold it, to support it, to protect it, to defend it, we’re doing more than simply agreeing to do whatever the courts will tolerate. We’re taking an oath to the principles embodied in this 224 year old document that has fostered the greatest civilization the world has ever known.”
~ Utah Senator Mike Lee

By: Joshua Lyons

Joshua Lyons — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:29:31 +0000

Great article by Scott Strzelczyk! Listen to him this Saturday along with TAC’s Mike Maharrey (re: Nullification and NullifyNow Philly) on The Forgotten Men radio show @ 12noon ET! (www.ForgottenMen.com & 930 WFMD)

By: The Rule of Law – Florida Tenth Amendment Center

The Rule of Law – Florida Tenth Amendment Center — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:43:07 +0000

[...] Episode 33: NDAA Nullification, Health Freedom and Upcoming Events Tenth Amendment Center Main FeedThe Rule of LawThe Great ForgettingA brief legal (and mildly political) analysis of the NDAAYes, They DO Hate the [...]

By: WilliamSchooler

WilliamSchooler — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:51:51 +0000

Though I agree with much that is stated the alterations of Rule of law is one of these concepts that has been continually altered over much of history.

Yes I agree the constitution is the rules of Law for those governing to be governed by and not for the people to be government by. But is does come from the roots of natural law in mans or life’s full support. As in no man is above another nor does man have anymore authority than another. That we are created equal as in capabilities, able to create ideas, make decisions and evaluate our actions in a chosen direction. The law is we are life in support of life and the activities that go against this idea are against our natural right to exist and do what we are capable of.

One could go into dictionaries and find multiple definitions but the best way to cut through the bull is to see how it actually applies to you as life. This is where the experience can become very real as well the questions become answered. If I know I am life and I make all my choices in support of life this would then include all other life BY NATURE, this is something that can be fully experienced without question if the time is taken.

Next is Liberty, and I truly want to take all the text books and find a dumpster. Most dictionaries give the very basic meaning of this word and it means to be FREE FROM, and the question we have to ask ourselves or answer ourselves is what is it life needs to be free FROM? History has provided many answers to this question, but the Declaration of Independence best answers this with no more questions to ask or be answered and it means to be free from Governments who oppose the Republic way of life where Life is in support of itself by the activities it performs. And it means this for a very good reason. There is no point in having any unalienable right to life if you have no Liberty to allow this right. The Constitution applied and adhered to provides this Liberty to all life who choose A Republic form of life. Please get over it, this is something that can be lived over and over and the questions fully resolved.

It is amazing how so many take so many words and make them so much like a gospel word when in history there has been so many alterations and perversions of language its not even funny or is it? How does it fit into your LIFE, OH wait, you are LIFE Right?

Next is Justice, this is so far out of whack it isn’t even real to me what these idiots project this to mean. Justice simply means those who have taken no responsibility for their actions be held accountable for such actions, either by choice or by authority designated. In other words if some guy steals your car, decides to bring it back and totally compensate you for his destructive act towards you what act was done wrong? None because he took full responsibility for his inappropriate actions. Now if he refuses to take this responsibility and he can be proved of such a crime then the choice becomes mandated, you will compensate by working public projects until it is entirely paid for as well his own sustainment. When this is done he is done and hopefully learned a valuable lesson by all the effort he had to put into recover the losses. If he refuses, he will be afforded a 6×6 cell with bread and water. No bed, no medical care, no dentistry, no TV because there is a choice to take responsibility or live with no responsibility nor anyone taking responsibility for you. It actively is giving people a choice unless of course they kill somebody. There is no way to compensate for death, but the choice should be hard labor on road crews so they support their own sustainment or its bread and water and 6×6 cell. This is not out of line and is very much mutual respect. If you give welfare you will have welfare recipients and jail birds are no different. Today there is no justice, there are the producing being taxed to death to house thief’s and killers and druggies who should not even be in this system.

Thank you for using the Declaration of Independence since it is the reason a Constitution even exist and thank you for this article, I hope we see more like these.

By: The Rule of Law | Libertarios of America

The Rule of Law | Libertarios of America — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:55:18 +0000

[...] laws the Rule of Law constrains government bureaucrats andRead the rest of this article at: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/06/the-rule-of-law/ Click "Home" to find this article in English. Clic "Inicio" para encontrar este artículo en [...]