The Presidency and Mythology

  • Share on Tumblr

by Andrew Napolitano

The following was Judge Napolitano’s closing argument on his FreedomWatch Presidents’ Day Special earlier this year, which featured Tom DiLorenzo and Tom Woods as guests.

Does the government work on behalf of the people or do the people exist for the benefit of government? Is history a recollection of things that have actually happened, or a narrative deployed to legitimize power and the crimes that led to the acquisition of that power? Tonight, on this President’s Day, state-sanctioned history, the Presidents of the United States, and you.

In the last hour we’ve heard that some of the Presidents often billed by historians and the public as “the greatest” were anything but. To be fair, it’s difficult to be a great person when your job is to head an organization like the State that is rooted in deception, theft, and murder. And we know from Lord Acton that no great man is a good man.

From the beginning, any claim that the American government is good because some Americans are exceptional does not make any sense. The individual virtues of human beings cannot possibly extend to the government. By definition, the government lies, cheats, and steals. After all, it has no resources of its own, only those it appropriates from the people. No one may lawfully compete with it. We are forced to pay its bills and accept its so-called services. There is no escaping it. The ideas behind a nation may be exceptional, but they are not manifested by the government. And, of course, we must never mistake the government for the people it claims to represent.

So, why does the official history of our Presidents seem like so much mythology and legend when viewed side by side with what really happened? Is history being deliberately manipulated to whitewash the crimes of the past and manufacture the consent of the people? Or is the whitewashing of history simply a natural reaction by a people and a culture that would rather not come to terms with their not so rosy past? It’s both. It is human instinct to trivialize the dark and the wicked in us and to elevate the good and the honorable in us. But, indeed, the history transmitted to you and your children in government schools has whitewashed all the Presidents but a few. And make no mistake about it, they are government schools; because they all exist at the pleasure of the State so that the government’s version of history becomes the popular version of history. Napoleon understood this when he remarked that history is not the record of what has happened before us, it is the record of what people think has happened before us. The government understands this, too.

Franklin Roosevelt manipulated the United States into World War II for years prior to a declaration of war. The Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7th 1941 was not only not a surprise, but was facilitated by FDR. Abraham Lincoln was a racial supremacist who wanted blacks forcibly removed to Africa. Woodrow Wilson arrested people for speaking German in public. If these facts were as well known as the fiction that has surrounded them, then the information which the government wishes us to accept uncritically about the present day state of affairs would be more vigorously challenged. So here is the lesson: The government has mythologized the past in order to lull us into accepting its version of the present; and the essence of that mythology is the presidency.

When Lincoln stated at Gettysburg that government is of the people, by the people, and for the people, that was government propaganda. The government is not of the people, and it shares none of the characteristics and traits of the people themselves. No less a president than George Washington told us that government is not reason, it is force. Government is a tool, a powerful and a dangerous tool. And so it must be wielded carefully and only when moral, constitutional, necessary, and proper. Government officials are not performing a public service, and they do not regard themselves as public servants. They regard themselves as our masters.

Under the Constitution and the law, as I’ve said time and again on this show, they are employees of the people and ought to serve at our pleasure. When we lionize our government officials, be they Presidents or postal workers, when we mythologize and deify them, when we build temples to worship them, we violate the nature of the service they ought to be performing. Jefferson would be scandalized at the temples we have built for him. Lincoln and FDR would no doubt welcome theirs. If we want to take our government back, we must begin by taking an honest account of what our government has done, ostensibly in our names, and reject the untrue narratives it instead foists upon us. The truth shall set us free.

All presidents but Jefferson have argued that their first job was to keep us safe. All presidents but Jefferson were wrong. If you read the Constitution, you will see that the President’s first job – as Jefferson understood well – is to keep us free.

Andrew P. Napolitano [send him mail], a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst at the Fox News Channel, and the host of “FreedomWatch“ on the Fox Business Network. His latest books are Lies the Government Told You: Myth, Power, and Deception in American History, (Nelson, 2010), and his newest release, It is Dangerous to be Right When the Government is Wrong: The Case for Personal Freedom.

Copyright © 2011 Andrew P. Napolitano, Published by Thomas Nelson

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?
11 comments
Mi Copperhead
Mi Copperhead

Give me liberty, I'll provide for my own safety.

Mark Fordman
Mark Fordman

Judge Napolitano, as usual, is exactly right regarding the job of the President.

Frank Erdman
Frank Erdman

It is in trying to keep us safe that we become more unsafe.

Robert E. Lowers
Robert E. Lowers

If WE would Return to local fund raising for national office ..WE would be the ones having a VOICE? These Globalistic billionaires would be silenced? WE elect a representative not a leader.Federal laws are supposed to be COMMON laws for ALL. They are supposed to be BLIND,EXACT and carry the same sword for ALL ,,in that way WE can be 'from many one.This social justice who or what you are crap is dividing US in so many ways we may never again be Indivisable or even have opportunity.WHO CARES WHO THE PRESIDENT IS WHEN IT OPERATES AS A FASCIST DEMOCRACY RATHER THAN A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC?

Pie
Pie

If a man is not good he can never be great.

williamschooler
williamschooler

This is so true and really what it boils down to is what is popular which now shines the light on a person as the point of view. What it is not is the truth because the truth takes far more to face about you. To question you, to find these answers about you and they can be revealing and what we find is we make mistakes, we screw it up and we make bad choices. These are all viewed as unacceptable when in fact they are a part of who we are and our lessons to ourselves and to each other. Each has our own cause and is only awaiting our true ownership. I only started to see when I looked through my own brilliance as saw the real me and when this was discovered then tons of discoveries begin to take place. So the decision to be afraid of your own actions is the worst choice of all.

Popular people make great Democracies, but they do not bring truth to the table, are not responsible and do not support a Republic by any such acts. The crime truly is us and our own unwillingness to face the mirror.

Good old Mythology, the disappearance of you by not facing the facts that are presented and also very popular, ever notice this?

Len
Len

? Or is the whitewashing of history simply a natural reaction by a people and a culture that would rather not come to terms with their not so rosy past? It’s both. It is human instinct to trivialize the dark and the wicked in us and to elevate the good and the honorable in us.

The above hits it on the dot. There are many who want to be able to say "look at all the good we have done.", and thus absolve themselves of their sins, and then others who by blaming government for not doing enough, or others for not cooperating enough also absolve themselves of their sins. It's why for so many government and politics takes on such a religious nature and due to their ego attachment are unreachable through reason, and refuse to consider a just and good government as being limited to that which is basically a tort system with the legislature being concerned in the main with passing laws in regard to voluntary interactions with other and protecting property rights, not the care of "it's" people or the doing of good.

Philosopherking
Philosopherking

I assume you are talking about darker events in American history and it is true that nations tend to do this but you seem to have morphed all human beings both present and past into a single individual. The sins of individuals in the past tend to be sins of individuals today. I was under the impression I was a separate person than other people around me who is not responsible for their own sins and if this is true then how can anyone in the present be responsible for the sins of separate individuals of the past.

That nationalistic tendency of the left is quite obvious at times.

zack
zack

It's crazy, but true. Great men tend to attain that status by climbing the ladder of deceit, corruption, etc.