The Evil 1%

by Lew Rockwell

The “occupy” protest movement is thriving off the claim that the 99% are being exploited by the 1%, and there is truth in what they say. But they have the identities of the groups wrong. They imagine that it is the 1% of highest wealth holders who are the problem. In fact, that 1% includes some of the smartest, most innovative people in the country – the people who invent, market, and distribute material blessings to the whole population. They also own the capital that sustains productivity and growth.

But there is another 1% out there, those who do live parasitically off the population and exploit the 99%. Moreover, there is a long intellectual tradition, dating back to the late middle ages that draws attention to the strange reality that a tiny minority lives off the productive labor of the overwhelming majority.

I’m speaking of the State, which even today is made up of a tiny sliver of the population, but is the direct cause of all the impoverishing wars, inflation, taxes, regimentation, and social conflict. This 1% is the direct cause of the violence, the censorship, the unemployment, and vast amounts of poverty, too.

Look at the numbers, rounding from latest data. The U.S. population is 307 million. There are about 20 million government employees at all levels, which makes 6.5%. But 6.2 million of these people are public school teachers, whom I think we can say are not really the ruling elite. That takes us down to 4.4%.

We can knock of another half million who work for the post office, and probably the same who work for various service department bureaus. Probably another million do not work in any enforcement arm of the State, and there’s also the amazing labor-pool fluff that comes with any government work. Local governments do not cause nation-wide problems (usually), and the same might be said of the 50 states. The real problem is at the federal level (8.5 million), from which we can subtract fluff, drones, and service workers.

In the end, we end up with about 3 million people who constitute what is commonly called the State. For short, we can just call these people the 1%.

The 1% do not generate any wealth of their own. Everything they have they get by taking from others under the cover of law. They live at our expense. Without us, the State as an institution would die.

Here we come to the core of the issue. What is the State and what does it do? There is vast confusion about this issue, insofar as it is talked about at all. For hundreds of years, people have imagined that the State might be an organic institution that develops naturally out of some social contract. Or perhaps the State is our benefactor because it provides services we could not otherwise provide for ourselves.

In classrooms and in political discussions, there is very little if any honest talk about what the State is and what it does. But in the libertarian tradition, matters are much clearer. From Bastiat to Rothbard, the answer has been before our eyes. The State is the only institution in society that is permitted by law to use aggressive force against person and property.

Let’s understand through a simple example. Let’s say you go into a restaurant and hate the wallpaper. You can complain and try to persuade the owner to change it. If he doesn’t change it, you can decide not to go back. But if you break in, take money out of the cash register, buy paint, and cover the wallpaper yourself, you will be charged with criminal wrongdoing and perhaps go to jail. Everyone in society agrees that you did the wrong thing.

But the State is different. If it doesn’t like the wallpaper, it can pass a law (or maybe even not that) and send a memo. It can mandate a change. It doesn’t have to do the repainting. The State can make you repaint the place. If you refuse, you are guilty of criminal wrongdoing.

Same goals, different means, two very different sets of criminals. The State is the institution that essentially redefines criminal wrongdoing to make itself exempt from the law that governs everyone else.

It is the same with every tax, every regulation, every mandate, and every single word of the federal code. It all represents coercion. Even in the area of money and banking, it is the State that created and sustains the Fed and the dollar because it forcibly limits competition in money and banking, preventing people from making gold or silver money, or innovating in other ways. And in some ways, this is the most dreadful intervention of all, because it allows the State to destroy our money on a whim.

The State is everybody’s enemy. Why don’t the protesters get this? Because they are victims of propaganda by the State, doled out in public school, that attempts to blame all human suffering on private parties and free enterprise. They do not comprehend that the real enemy is the institution that brainwashes them to think the way they do.

They are right that society is rife with conflicts, and that the contest is wildly lopsided. It is indeed the 99% vs. the 1%. They’re just wrong about the identity of the enemy.

Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. [send him mail], former editorial assistant to Ludwig von Mises and congressional chief of staff to Ron Paul, is founder and chairman of the Mises Institute, executor for the estate of Murray N. Rothbard, and editor of LewRockwell.com. See his books.

Copyright © 2011 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?
33 comments
Dennis Showman
Dennis Showman

A den of vipers & thieves the only problem the snake are getting a bum rap.

Ronna Beach
Ronna Beach

He nearly ruined the Banks in his time. It took years to become the thieves they are again today. We need a President that will go after the spectators, and take out the greedy bastards

Shacke Ouzounian Rose
Shacke Ouzounian Rose

- The international bankers are culprits! President Andrew Jackson, in discussing the Bank Renewal bill with a delegation of bankers in 1832, said, "Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time, and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the eternal God, I will rout you out."

Dale Johnson
Dale Johnson

Extremely WELL-WRITTEN and worthwhile read! Thank you, Lew-- you are right on. I wish I could have expressed what you have taught us so clearly.

Ric Weide
Ric Weide

I think we need to investigate every who states that he is "for us", "one of us", "for the middle class", or any of the cliches that seem to be the latest fad of "political speak". After all, isn't politics the art of deceptive speaking?

Sandra Huband
Sandra Huband

Herman Cain is not just the CEO of Godfather's Pizza but was Chairman of the Federal Reserve of Kansas City. He is not "one of us" or a "real American" like I keep hearing.

Jan Paulson
Jan Paulson

It's the Federal Reserve Bank that the OWS should be protesting but the HUGE majority of people don't understand what "money" really is so they don't understand what the problem really is.

Jan Paulson
Jan Paulson

"If BANKS are EVER allowed to issue a PAPER MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE, the CORPORATIONS that will grow up around them wil come to own the land our Fathers died for." Thomas Jefferson

Felicia Ann Griffin
Felicia Ann Griffin

or rather, follow the trail of consolidation of power, like for example this graph of who controls the media, which shows how only a few corporations control all the major media outlets (TV, print, radio...), and there is one for Banks too, one for agriculture/food in the US of which about 90 % is now owned by major corporations. Do just a little research to find out how these corporations gained this power, and what connects them to each other and their connections to specific people in the government (like the Bush connection to Haliburton which financed materials for our continuous wars and somehow won this bid before other companies had a chance ) http://www.nowfoundation.org/issues/communications/tv/mediacontrol.html

Felicia Ann Griffin
Felicia Ann Griffin

lol, this is funny to me because the people in the government are just pawns - they don't have any real wealth and no real power. follow the money. Like our Federal Reserve, which is not owned or governed by the government - it is privately owned - yet it controls the US economy.

Timothy Sturgill
Timothy Sturgill

Don't complete agree. The constitution mandansetes providing for the common defense, meaning our military. The military is the strength of the state.

Roger Pettis
Roger Pettis

Only supporting him, because Dave Ramsey won't run!

Sadey Jones
Sadey Jones

I U read the article, it makes great sense...I have bookmarked it and I will go back and read it again, and again if need be. Examination of the facts of ANY situation is essential before blurting out one's quick opinion...that is MY opinion...and only mine...I own it...Bye!!!!

Citywatch Bloomington
Citywatch Bloomington

This is an excellent description of the problem, and what a very small minority perceives as the problem. A little light on a subject always tends to expose the issue from a realistic perspective.

Lisa S.Dutton
Lisa S.Dutton

100% of us need to keep communicating/educating/challenging/exchanging ideas for a different way to be an American. Ron Paul 2012.

Harry Richards
Harry Richards

It's even less than 1%, they are called Bilderbergs...:)

James Fisher
James Fisher

I'm part of the 53% which includes that 1%!

Angelena Etherton
Angelena Etherton

it isn't the evil 1% that's the problem. it's the majority of uneducated that understand they're losing their rights and privileges and continue to push for more tax and more government interference

Gene Roberts
Gene Roberts

You guys have been on the wrong planet for a long time. Read the current Rolling Stone article:

Wall Street Isn't Winning – It's Cheating
October 25, 9:26 AM ET
| By Matt Taibbi

Critics say the OWS protesters hate the rich. Come on! Success is the national religion, and almost everyone is a believer. Americans love winners. But that's just the problem. These guys on Wall Street are not winning – they're cheating. And as much as we love the self-made success story, we hate the cheater that much more.
| More »

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibbl...

Gene Roberts

Where are the blogs about the UN-constitutional Drone killings of the American citizens in Yemen?

Michael Boldin
Michael Boldin

Gene - you did not do a search? hmmmm....we have PLENTY on the unconstitutional foreign policy of both Obama and Bush, here on our main site and also on our blog. Before you make more silly statements, check it out....

Philosopherking
Philosopherking

The state is the only institution that is granted an exception to the moral rule that you can not use force against others. It is like a band of legal gang bangers running around. That gang is not a problem if you can direct their violent efforts to positive use such as ruffing up the guy that stole money from your grandma. That is the best way you can describe good government which is government that uses force in a manor that is consistent with how your or I would use it which is for the protection of our lives, liberty, and property.

Philosopherking
Philosopherking

When you think about it for a moment the occupy people are really protesting other people. Which is kind of strange if you think about it. It is not a public policy that they are protesting such as any particular war but the private activities of others.

Philosopherking
Philosopherking

Most socialist arguments seem to want to create a sense that the wealthy are taking away your rights. Perhaps that is done by design because by directing that energy towards the wealthy, who happen to be other citizens just like them, they direct that energy away from the government. That is exactly where the authoritarians want you to focus.

CK Clark Kent
CK Clark Kent

The 1% are all GLOBALIST anti-Americans .LIKE George SOROS and Barry Obama .

williamschooler
williamschooler

I am thinking your numbers may be off as well as the group you insist on. Lets be sincere here and this one percent are bought and paid for by those who have no intent on products at all. They infiltrate our banking, our Government and all of wall street. They are the money changers as they were long ago. There insistence over history is well stated and not to be mis interpreted. It is the elusion to create distractions from you, from your capacities and focus on the idea they propose. They own the lawyers, law makers and anyone else who will enforce their will over the people.

Thomas Jefferson did not lie and you would do well to heed his words. This is an on going problem for the last 5500 years and to deny this absolute is to doubt yourself and the experiences you have gone through. All influence to direct you in a direction not of your choosing in all honesty. The greatest influence can be tracked through language itself and we are as prone as any society before us.

And for the record it is 1% evil and 99 % ignorance that got us here so we are far from being off the hook so stop assuming and measure the results of finance, we are far from successful as a nation we are BUSTED, broke, not producing to the level of sustainment. These do not lie and the biggest known product on this planet to date is DEBT. You would also do well to use observation skills as well, it is viewable and frightening.

Our best not used program ever is the Declaration of Independence and until it is fully understood and utilized it as our Foundation, Our principals to rebuild and accomplish A Republic we will suffer our ignorance. Since I am the furthest thing from guessing you keep on doubting and further more do not go look for yourself.

We don't even have a clue to how much force we truly are, again our ignorance.

The occupy movement is a reaction to what people know is wrong, their weakness is they are not sure how or what to do. Learn your Foundation and apply its terms or keep dreaming and watch it disappear.

What is the popular idea? A Republic or Democracy? Does popular know or does popular guess? You be the judge.