<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Media War On Nullification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/18/the-media-war-on-nullification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/18/the-media-war-on-nullification/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: amglolz</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/18/the-media-war-on-nullification/comment-page-1/#comment-494845</link>
		<dc:creator>amglolz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7763#comment-494845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This guys interpretation of the tenth amendment is completely wrong and based on selective sources. Courts have always thrown out this theory, even as early as a quarter century of the Constitution&#039;s drafting.  
 
And think of the end game. If states are sovereign, can Maine liberals withhold tax money for wars it doesn&#039;t like? Ignore a future Supreme Court decision that overturns Roe v. Wade and keep allowing abortions? Can Connecticut keep knocking down houses because it just doesn&#039;t buy into the Kelo eminent domain decision? 
 
This goes both ways. Do you really want to live in a state where Democratic legislators get to interpret the Constitution on your behalf and ignore conservative federal laws and policies they disagree with? Because even if you disagree on the interpretation personally, if more people in this state looked at the Constitution differently than yourself you would have no recourse in a nullification world.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guys interpretation of the tenth amendment is completely wrong and based on selective sources. Courts have always thrown out this theory, even as early as a quarter century of the Constitution&#039;s drafting.  </p>
<p>And think of the end game. If states are sovereign, can Maine liberals withhold tax money for wars it doesn&#039;t like? Ignore a future Supreme Court decision that overturns Roe v. Wade and keep allowing abortions? Can Connecticut keep knocking down houses because it just doesn&#039;t buy into the Kelo eminent domain decision? </p>
<p>This goes both ways. Do you really want to live in a state where Democratic legislators get to interpret the Constitution on your behalf and ignore conservative federal laws and policies they disagree with? Because even if you disagree on the interpretation personally, if more people in this state looked at the Constitution differently than yourself you would have no recourse in a nullification world.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Prather</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/18/the-media-war-on-nullification/comment-page-1/#comment-441069</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Prather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7763#comment-441069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good points, Chris. You highlight the struggle to encourage people to see beyond partisan political gaming and see the issue for what it is -- keeping government within Constitutional proscriptions.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, Chris. You highlight the struggle to encourage people to see beyond partisan political gaming and see the issue for what it is &#8212; keeping government within Constitutional proscriptions.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Media War On Nullification &#171; Secession and Nullification â€” News &#38; Information</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/18/the-media-war-on-nullification/comment-page-1/#comment-441034</link>
		<dc:creator>The Media War On Nullification &#171; Secession and Nullification â€” News &#38; Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7763#comment-441034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] article by Chris Dixon on TenthAmendmentCenter.com. &#8230;Â Similar to the liberal animus against George W. Bush with REAL ID? Regardless, this is [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] article by Chris Dixon on TenthAmendmentCenter.com. &#8230;Â Similar to the liberal animus against George W. Bush with REAL ID? Regardless, this is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Media War On Nullification â€“ Tenth Amendment Center -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/18/the-media-war-on-nullification/comment-page-1/#comment-440917</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Media War On Nullification â€“ Tenth Amendment Center -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7763#comment-440917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, Not afraid 2 be free, Va Liberty Party, Debbie Woodall, SteveTaff and others. SteveTaff said: The Media War On Nullification http://bit.ly/h1q8yO - Freedom! [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, Not afraid 2 be free, Va Liberty Party, Debbie Woodall, SteveTaff and others. SteveTaff said: The Media War On Nullification <a href="http://bit.ly/h1q8yO" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/h1q8yO</a> &#8211; Freedom! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
