<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing the Utah Intrastate Commerce Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/16/introducing-the-utah-intrastate-commerce-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/16/introducing-the-utah-intrastate-commerce-project/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:10:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Introducing the Utah Intrastate Commerce Project &#171; Maricopa County Republican Committee</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/16/introducing-the-utah-intrastate-commerce-project/comment-page-1/#comment-493896</link>
		<dc:creator>Introducing the Utah Intrastate Commerce Project &#171; Maricopa County Republican Committee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 07:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7759#comment-493896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Â© 2011 by TenthAmendmentCenter.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Â© 2011 by TenthAmendmentCenter.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Full Nature of Liberty and Governance &#8211; Our State Constitutions &#171; Maricopa County Republican Committee</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/16/introducing-the-utah-intrastate-commerce-project/comment-page-1/#comment-492796</link>
		<dc:creator>Full Nature of Liberty and Governance &#8211; Our State Constitutions &#171; Maricopa County Republican Committee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 04:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7759#comment-492796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Â© 2011 by TenthAmendmentCenter.com. Â Reprint permission by Jim [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Â© 2011 by TenthAmendmentCenter.com. Â Reprint permission by Jim [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bergman</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/16/introducing-the-utah-intrastate-commerce-project/comment-page-1/#comment-444954</link>
		<dc:creator>Bergman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7759#comment-444954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wet my pants reading that link to the Federalist Blog by P.A. Madison. He should earn a Nobel prize for that elegant description of the power to regulate commerce.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wet my pants reading that link to the Federalist Blog by P.A. Madison. He should earn a Nobel prize for that elegant description of the power to regulate commerce.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Article on City Weekly &#124; Utah Intrastate Commerce</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/16/introducing-the-utah-intrastate-commerce-project/comment-page-1/#comment-440711</link>
		<dc:creator>Article on City Weekly &#124; Utah Intrastate Commerce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7759#comment-440711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] remain in the state and thus are arguably not subject to federal purview. As Connor Boyack of the Tenth Amendment Center writes of the Constitution&#8217;s commerce clause: &#8220;Like a plastic surgery addict, this [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] remain in the state and thus are arguably not subject to federal purview. As Connor Boyack of the Tenth Amendment Center writes of the Constitution&rsquo;s commerce clause: &ldquo;Like a plastic surgery addict, this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utah Intrastate Commerce Project Starts Legislative Initiative &#124; STATESMAN SENTINEL</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/16/introducing-the-utah-intrastate-commerce-project/comment-page-1/#comment-440709</link>
		<dc:creator>Utah Intrastate Commerce Project Starts Legislative Initiative &#124; STATESMAN SENTINEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7759#comment-440709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] this bill would be for our farmers! Those who sell their products at farmerâ€™s markets, through CSAs, to local restaurants, and in other ways to fellow Utahns would be shielded by state law in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this bill would be for our farmers! Those who sell their products at farmerâ€™s markets, through CSAs, to local restaurants, and in other ways to fellow Utahns would be shielded by state law in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Militant Libertarian &#187; Introducing the Utah Intrastate Commerce Project</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/16/introducing-the-utah-intrastate-commerce-project/comment-page-1/#comment-439645</link>
		<dc:creator>Militant Libertarian &#187; Introducing the Utah Intrastate Commerce Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 05:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7759#comment-439645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] by Connor Boyack, 10AC [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Connor Boyack, 10AC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Greenslade</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/16/introducing-the-utah-intrastate-commerce-project/comment-page-1/#comment-439464</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Greenslade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7759#comment-439464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This helps support Conner&#039;s comments about the usurpation of power under FDR. 
 
Alfred Clark, in a speech before the Oregon Bar Association on September 2, 1943, warned the American people that a federal monster had just been unleashed: 
 
&quot;Today, in a very real sense, law no longer governs the American people.  They are governed by regulations, orders and directives issued by one or the other of our multiple Federal bureaus.  I am not now referring to war regulation and the like, but to conditions existing before the war, and which, unless the trend is checked, are likely to continue and to intensify after the war is over. 
 
This has been accomplished, to a very large extent, through a new and, in many aspects, a startling interpretation of the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution, which is now being used to obliterate the States and convert our system into a highly centralized form of government, exercising uncontrolled police power in every State, over all, or nearly all, local affairs and industries. 
 
Lately the new and expanded construction of the commerce clause is being supported by a doctrine at first vaguely stated, but now taking definite form.  This doctrine is that Congress has the right, without any constitutional limitations whatsoever, to legislate on, and to regulate any and every matter affecting our way of living, if done with the asserted purpose of promoting the general welfare. 
 
The obvious trend of national legislation under the impact of Executive and bureaucratic pressure, and the obvious trend of judicial decisions in upholding and construing this legislation, is to expand Federal control so as to embrace almost every phase of the social and economic life of the American people. &quot; 
 
He went on to state: 
 
&quot;Congress may now, with the approval of the Supreme Court, deny to any commodity, produced in any State, access to interstate transportation facilities for any reason, or indeed, for no reason whatever.  The power to exclude any goods from commerce is now declared to be unlimited. 
 
Each State may now, at the will of the Federal Government, be compelled to become an isolated, self-contained, economic unit, cut off from any commerce with other States or foreign nations, unless it yields complete control and regulation of its industries to the Federal Government.  Agriculture, mining and manufacturing are now held to be in interstate commerce, and all phases subject to Federal regulation. &quot; 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This helps support Conner&#039;s comments about the usurpation of power under FDR. </p>
<p>Alfred Clark, in a speech before the Oregon Bar Association on September 2, 1943, warned the American people that a federal monster had just been unleashed: </p>
<p>&quot;Today, in a very real sense, law no longer governs the American people.  They are governed by regulations, orders and directives issued by one or the other of our multiple Federal bureaus.  I am not now referring to war regulation and the like, but to conditions existing before the war, and which, unless the trend is checked, are likely to continue and to intensify after the war is over. </p>
<p>This has been accomplished, to a very large extent, through a new and, in many aspects, a startling interpretation of the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution, which is now being used to obliterate the States and convert our system into a highly centralized form of government, exercising uncontrolled police power in every State, over all, or nearly all, local affairs and industries. </p>
<p>Lately the new and expanded construction of the commerce clause is being supported by a doctrine at first vaguely stated, but now taking definite form.  This doctrine is that Congress has the right, without any constitutional limitations whatsoever, to legislate on, and to regulate any and every matter affecting our way of living, if done with the asserted purpose of promoting the general welfare. </p>
<p>The obvious trend of national legislation under the impact of Executive and bureaucratic pressure, and the obvious trend of judicial decisions in upholding and construing this legislation, is to expand Federal control so as to embrace almost every phase of the social and economic life of the American people. &quot; </p>
<p>He went on to state: </p>
<p>&quot;Congress may now, with the approval of the Supreme Court, deny to any commodity, produced in any State, access to interstate transportation facilities for any reason, or indeed, for no reason whatever.  The power to exclude any goods from commerce is now declared to be unlimited. </p>
<p>Each State may now, at the will of the Federal Government, be compelled to become an isolated, self-contained, economic unit, cut off from any commerce with other States or foreign nations, unless it yields complete control and regulation of its industries to the Federal Government.  Agriculture, mining and manufacturing are now held to be in interstate commerce, and all phases subject to Federal regulation. &quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Introducing the Utah Intrastate Commerce Project &#171; Secession and Nullification â€” News &#38; Information</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/16/introducing-the-utah-intrastate-commerce-project/comment-page-1/#comment-439009</link>
		<dc:creator>Introducing the Utah Intrastate Commerce Project &#171; Secession and Nullification â€” News &#38; Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 11:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7759#comment-439009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] article by Connor Boyack on TenthAmendmentCenter.com. Throwing any anachronistic caution to the wind, Congress now assumes the authority to regulate [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] article by Connor Boyack on TenthAmendmentCenter.com. Throwing any anachronistic caution to the wind, Congress now assumes the authority to regulate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Introducing the Utah Intrastate Commerce Project â€“ Tenth Amendment Center -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/01/16/introducing-the-utah-intrastate-commerce-project/comment-page-1/#comment-438857</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Introducing the Utah Intrastate Commerce Project â€“ Tenth Amendment Center -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 08:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7759#comment-438857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter and others. TenthAmendmentCenter said: #10th: Introducing the Utah Intrastate Commerce Project http://bit.ly/enTZs1 #commerce #nullification #utah #tlot [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter and others. TenthAmendmentCenter said: #10th: Introducing the Utah Intrastate Commerce Project <a href="http://bit.ly/enTZs1" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/enTZs1</a> #commerce #nullification #utah #tlot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
