We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Permission!

The following is based off a speech given at Nullify Now! in Orlando, FL on 10-10-10.
Watch the video here: Part 1, Part 2

We don’t need no stinkin’ permission to exercise our rights. We need to exercise our rights whether they the government want us to or not.

Ok, so let’s start out with the easy stuff, here… I’m a proud tenther. That means I believe that the federal government is authorized to exercise only those powers that we the people delegated to it in the constitution – and nothing more.

The founders created a system, unique in history, where the most difficult and most divisive issues would be kept close to home in our states and our communities. And, there’s a good reason for such a system – it’s the only kind that can allow people of widely varying political, religious, and economic viewpoints living together in peace. I’m from California. In Florida, you likely don’t want California’s policies. We shouldn’t be required to have Florida’s. Maine should be different from Montana, Texas should be different from South Carolina, and so on. This is the system that best advances freedom.

Unfortunately, though, for a long long time, there’s been very little that the federal government does that actually IS authorized by the constitution.

QUESTION: WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT IT?

- Do we lobby congress or march on DC and ask that federal politicians limit their own power?
- Do we sue them in court and ask federal judges to limit federal power?
- Do we vote the bums out – and hope that the new bums will reject their own power?

Thomas Jefferson and James Madison both warned us that if the federal government ever became the sole and exclusive arbiter of the extent of its own powers – that power would endlessly grow…regardless of elections, separation of powers, courts, or other vaunted parts of our system.

They were right. For over a century, we the people have been suing, and marching, and lobbying, and voting the bums out. But yet…year in and year out, government continues to grow and your liberty continues to diminish. And, it doesn’t matter who is the president, or what political party controls congress – the growth of power in the federal government never stops.

Power – the problem we face today is about power – and until we address the absolute fact that the federal government has too much power, and going to the federal government to fix problems caused by federal power – things will never change.

John Adams once gave us a warning that “liberty once lost, is lost forever.” He wasn’t necessarily saying that there’s no hope whatsoever. But instead, it was an important lesson. Whenever government tells us they need more power to deal with an “emergency” – and they always have them for both foreign and domestic issues – that same government will never voluntarily give that power back. They’ll never just decide that the newfound power is something they don’t want, and that liberty will never be regained without a long, difficult struggle by the people.

WHAT WOULD JEFFERSON DO?

How do we fix this mess? Well, I think I’m in pretty good company if i go with Thomas Jefferson’s advice that “whensoever” the federal government exercises “undelegated powers” … “a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy.”

Reading this, you’ll notice that Jefferson didn’t say that a nullification of the act is a pretty decent remedy. He didn’t say that nullification is just a rightful remedy, or even a good idea to try after voting bums out or going to court. He told us that when the feds exercise powers they’re not supposed to exercise, We’re not supposed to wait for the federal government to correct itself. Jefferson’s advice is that we must resist violations of our rights on a state level – every time it happens.

Around the country, there’s a lot of talk about nullification – but what is it, really? I can think of no better way to define it than how Tenth Amendment Center research analyst Derek Sheriff has done – by describing what it is not:

Nullification is not secession or insurrection, but neither is it unconditional or unlimited submission. Nullification is not something that requires any decision, statement or action from any branch of the federal government. Nullification is not the result of obtaining a favorable court ruling. Nullification is not the petitioning of the federal government to start doing or to stop doing anything. Nullification doesn’t depend on any federal law being repealed. Nullification does not require permission from any person or institution outside of one’s own state.

Nullification is something that’s already happening around the country – and Derek explains the process:

Nullification begins with a decision made in your state legislature to resist a federal law deemed to be unconstitutional. It usually involves a bill, which is passed by both houses and is signed by your governor. In some cases, it might be approved by the voters of your state directly, in a referendum. It may change your state’s statutory law or it might even amend your state constitution. It is a refusal on the part of your state government to cooperate with, or enforce any federal law it deems to be unconstitutional.

At its very core, nullification is any action on a state level that results in some federal law being null and void – and of no effect. It’s about “We the People” exercising our rights whether the politicians or judges in Washington D.C want to give us “permission” to exercise those rights or not. We don’t need no stinkin’ permission.

HEMPCON

I recently went to an event called Hemp Con down in my part of the state – Los Angeles. This is a big event at the LA convention center – with loads of vendors and businesses from every angle you can think of in support of the marijuana industry.

There were home security companies to help protect your weed, solar power companies to help you grow your weed, doctors giving out medical marijuana cards to virtually anyone with $80 and an hour of time. There were even delivery services – you can get your marijuana delivered to you 24 hours a day…in 30 minutes or less. The pizza companies have nothing on these guys! It was amazing if you think about it from an economic standpoint – this was capitalism, the free market – working its wonders around an industry.

What’s the point?

Virtually every single one of those businesses was either directly violating federal law, or aiding someone else in doing so because marijuana is illegal, according to the feds – but not the constitution – in all situations. And guess what – no ATF or DEA thugs shut the place down. Business functioned, people did what they wanted to in freedom, and that was that.

In fact, in 2005, the Supreme Court ruled that state medical marijuana laws were illegal. At that time there were 10 states that had such laws. Since that court ruling came down, not one single state has repealed their law. And today, there’s even more adding on – there’s now 15 states defying Washington DC on marijuana, and they’re getting away with it.

THE BLUEPRINT

When enough people say no to unconstitutional laws, regulations, and mandates…and enough states pass laws to back those people up, there’s not much the federal government can do, but slowly and consistently back off. There’s no tanks rolling into Los Angeles to shut down the dispensaries. This is far from perfect, but it can work, and it is working right now.

The Original Constitution

Get the New Book Today!

Whether it’s gun rights, or health freedom, or maybe someone should start rejecting the Department of Education because we’re sick of the federal government controlling our schools…the solution to our problems does not lie with the federal government. It lies in our states, and with ourselves.

THE BIG QUESTION

So here’s the final question – and my big challenge to you today. When it happens some day, and it will, that the federal government tells you that you have to purchase some healthcare plan, and you start thinking about penalties for violating that “law” – ask yourself this…do you have as much courage as the pot smokers?

I sure hope you do. Because we need to exercise our rights whether they give us “permission” to or not!

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?

, , ,

98 Responses to We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Permission!

  1. Anita Messenger April 13, 2013 at 9:34 am #

    Yes, as long as the states keep taking fed dollars, then the feds DO have a legal leg to stand on…the 1942 Supreme Court decision in Wickard vs Filbern states: What the fed gov FINANCES/SUBSIDIZES, they have the right to REGULATE. Since that time they’ve been working on getting all the farmers, schools, STATE GOV’S, individuals (welfare, food stamps, MEDICAID, etc.) and more to take fed dollars. Even if you take one dollar more in social security than what you paid in…they got you. We are selling our freedom to them for worthless paper. How stupid is that…

  2. Vic Lunsford April 13, 2013 at 9:58 am #

    should turn the taxes around and the states fund the feds.

  3. Reynolds Pommering April 13, 2013 at 10:02 am #

    You know as well as I do that DISHONEST leftists only care about and refer to his “Wall of separation” quote.

  4. Reynolds Pommering April 13, 2013 at 10:04 am #

    @Anita: It’s beyond retarded.

  5. Marilyn Harris April 13, 2013 at 10:43 am #

    Fed funds are ropes which strangle the states.

  6. Thomas Kirby April 13, 2013 at 10:43 am #

    The real challenge will be when they decide to do that to the humane society.

  7. Dale Hicks April 13, 2013 at 10:50 am #

    it is your money, they are giving back to you.

  8. Tom Lefavour April 13, 2013 at 10:53 am #

    Was not our civil war centered around states rights? Slavery was of course the over riding emotional issue, but it WAS about states/people’s rights.

  9. Butch Hanson April 13, 2013 at 10:54 am #

    Why should anybody need fed. funds for anything? The fed doesn’t generate any money. Everything federal came from the states. Yet, they dangle the “free” money back to the original source, like they’re doing a big favor. Fuck these self-centered, arrogant pricks! What right do they have dole out political favors with my money?

  10. Bob Carpenter April 13, 2013 at 11:14 am #

    I hope we see a total turnover in washington next election.

  11. Elaine Vechorik April 13, 2013 at 11:30 am #

    That’s the problem in a nut-shell isn’t it? All the money going to the Feds, then the Feds using that money to bribe states. MS is Fed-dependent.

  12. Ross Williams April 13, 2013 at 12:29 pm #

    [[Wickard vs Filbern states: ...]]]
    Doesn’t matter what it states. I hope I don’t have to tell you that the USSC is frequently just as wrong in their legal rationalizations – and for exactly the same reasons: political expedience – as the legislation which was just rationalized.
    In the early 90s states started passing speed limit laws that defied the 55mph federal limitation – backed up by USDoT dollars. The feds whined and whimpered, made a few threats and wrote a bazillion huffy letters to states’ attorneys general. Then they read the writing on the wall, passed another law to obliterate the first one – that they had no Constitutional authority to pass – and gave the states the same USDoT money anyway.
    Don’t be so quick to throw in the towel.

  13. Roger Vickery Sr April 13, 2013 at 12:35 pm #

    Then the feds could pay their own bills!

  14. Kathleen Maurice April 13, 2013 at 12:40 pm #

    They don’t want to give up that ‘free money’ because they don’t acknowledge that it really isn’t free.

  15. Barbara A. Ames April 13, 2013 at 12:50 pm #

    I posted a blog yesterday concerning the Nevada state legislature, and how they seem to think that they are the law.

  16. Austin Sumner April 13, 2013 at 2:07 pm #

    For standing up for your rights, you will be called a traitor.
    Loyalists always attack the Patriots, naturally.
    It is a sheeple move.

  17. Marie Paulsen April 13, 2013 at 3:22 pm #

    What if it’s a Red State and Al Franken is your Congress man?? Doomed I’m afraid!!

  18. Melvin Wheeler April 13, 2013 at 3:34 pm #

    Regarding rights, the government has no permissive authority.

  19. Patricia E Ramsey April 13, 2013 at 5:36 pm #

    Agree!

  20. Diane Huck April 13, 2013 at 5:38 pm #

    Pelosi and Reed are worse. It is time to clean house.

  21. Wink Lundell April 13, 2013 at 5:40 pm #

    it’s time.

  22. Mike TheMan April 13, 2013 at 6:05 pm #

    that in cases of an abuse of the delegated powers, the members of the General Government, being chosen by the people, a change by the people would be the constitutional remedy; but, where powers are assumed which have not been delegated, a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy: that every State has a natural right in cases not within the compact, (casus non foederis,) to nullify of their own authority all assumptions of power by others within their limits: that without this right, they would be under the dominion, absolute and unlimited, of whosoever might exercise this right of judgment for them Founders Constitution: Volume 1, Chapter 8, Document 41

  23. Chris Royster April 13, 2013 at 6:08 pm #

    How did it get to this, since when do we have to vote on our rights???

  24. Wayne Wilbur April 13, 2013 at 6:18 pm #

    It will be Damned near impossible to Nullify anything, here in Vermont. The place is run by those Democrats and the NEA!

  25. Kevin Zabbo April 13, 2013 at 7:13 pm #

    Gotta vote BUMS out, and idiots in, who will take on the nullification mantle, and let the feds know that the laws they passed aren’t wanted. That’s all, folks.

  26. Emil Johnson April 13, 2013 at 7:49 pm #

    put them back in their place

  27. Sandra Grillette April 13, 2013 at 8:26 pm #

    It was that way for most of our history but makes you stop and think, what all does the fed do in our state. We are concidering leaving Colorado. The libs have stoled our state.

  28. Mike Copeland April 13, 2013 at 9:43 pm #

    …so what happened with the southern states and integration in the 50′s? (hint: National Guard on the steps of the Little Rock High School.) NOT saying segregation is right, just saying that recent “precedence” has been set with Federal authority usurping State’s rights. In many ways that was what the Civil War was all about.

  29. Mike Copeland April 13, 2013 at 9:46 pm #

    @Marilyn Murphy When you live amongst snakes (that would be NY politicians) it’s best to move somewhere else.

  30. Michael D Hudson April 14, 2013 at 2:52 am #

    Single payer is what the federal government is really after.

  31. Michael D Hudson April 14, 2013 at 2:57 am #

    Thomas Jeffersons focus was always about states right and their authority over the fed. The fed was never to hold authority over the states.

  32. ND Freeman April 14, 2013 at 6:07 am #

    I just hope when they come for our guns i am not the only one opposing them.

  33. Thomas Waun April 14, 2013 at 9:07 am #

    I’d like to nullify some of the acts of my state but the retaliation is inculpable. That being the case, I feel justified in working against them using subterfuge and deceit.

  34. Ann Reavis Anderson April 14, 2013 at 12:38 pm #

    well, I think all those that believe in ENTITLEMENTS have to believe that it is free, they don’t work!

  35. Ann Reavis Anderson April 14, 2013 at 12:48 pm #

    their egos are shpowing, not laws

  36. Eve Gilbert April 14, 2013 at 1:04 pm #

    That’s great but I live in NJ!

  37. Kevin Glenn April 14, 2013 at 1:30 pm #

    I guess it depends on what you consider an entitlement. Is social security an entitlement? I don’t believe so we all paid into it then the positions used to line their pockets to get re-elected. Is disability an entitlement? I believe not, once again we paid the money for it in the case it was needed. The government produces no income they take from the citizens and then pass it out to the people and call it an entitlement. We are entitled to it it is are money. The only people that are not entitled to it are the group of people that have come here illegally. But that is the group that this government has no problem giving it to.

  38. Hank Sims April 14, 2013 at 5:21 pm #

    Will we ever learn this and apply it generously?

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Tweets that mention We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Permission! – Tenth Amendment Center -- Topsy.com - November 30, 2010

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, Tom E. Snyder, FederalJack, John and Dagny Galt, 21st CenturyActivist and others. 21st CenturyActivist said: RT @RonPaul_2012: We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Permission! http://bit.ly/eBqkSB #tlot #tcot #RonPaul [...]

  2. We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Permission! « Secession and Nullification — News & Information - December 1, 2010

    [...] article by Michael Boldin on TenthAmendmentCenter.com. We don’t need no stinkin’ permission to exercise our rights. We need to exercise our rights [...]

  3. Remembering Rosa Parks – Tenth Amendment Center Blog - December 1, 2010

    [...] like a human. She didn’t even wait for a bus driver to give her permission. So, as I wrote in today’s featured article – “we don’t need no stinkin’ permission to exercise our rights – we [...]

  4. Rosa Parks - December 1, 2010

    [...] like a human. She didn’t even wait for a bus driver to give her permission. So, as I wrote in today’s featured article – “we don’t need no stinkin’ permission to exercise our rights – we need to exercise them [...]

  5. Swedish Court Confirms Arrest Warrant for WikiLeaks Founder | BeyonceSpecial - December 2, 2010

    [...] We Don't Need No Stinkin' Permission! – Tenth Amendment Center [...]

Leave a Reply