<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roger Clemens Should Plead the 10th!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/25/roger-clemens-should-plead-the-10th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/25/roger-clemens-should-plead-the-10th/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:05:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Henry Jones</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/25/roger-clemens-should-plead-the-10th/comment-page-1/#comment-336371</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6643#comment-336371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The black hole that the U.S. Congress uses to sap energy out of the American Republic, known as the commerce clause, does not apply in the Clemens case:  FEDERAL BASEBALL CLUB V. NATIONAL LEAGUE, 259 U. S. 200 (1922). 
 
This entire situation is really a non-event and we all need to contact our Congressmen and Congresswomen for a response on where they have the authority to do these types of investigations.  I have yet to hear from mine here in Georgia. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The black hole that the U.S. Congress uses to sap energy out of the American Republic, known as the commerce clause, does not apply in the Clemens case:  FEDERAL BASEBALL CLUB V. NATIONAL LEAGUE, 259 U. S. 200 (1922). </p>
<p>This entire situation is really a non-event and we all need to contact our Congressmen and Congresswomen for a response on where they have the authority to do these types of investigations.  I have yet to hear from mine here in Georgia. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Welsh</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/25/roger-clemens-should-plead-the-10th/comment-page-1/#comment-332076</link>
		<dc:creator>David Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 05:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6643#comment-332076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote to Roger Clemens and his attorney, pointing them to this article. Who knows, they just might plead the Tenth! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote to Roger Clemens and his attorney, pointing them to this article. Who knows, they just might plead the Tenth! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Boldin</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/25/roger-clemens-should-plead-the-10th/comment-page-1/#comment-332047</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 04:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6643#comment-332047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure is part of the problem!  Freedom of personal choice went down that rat hole a long time ago....we aim to turn that around (someday).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure is part of the problem!  Freedom of personal choice went down that rat hole a long time ago&#8230;.we aim to turn that around (someday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malcolmkyle</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/25/roger-clemens-should-plead-the-10th/comment-page-1/#comment-331942</link>
		<dc:creator>malcolmkyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6643#comment-331942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The war on drugs is a tale of a once great and free nation which fell down a rat hole into a fantasy world riddled with peculiar and dystopian logic.  
 
No amount of money, police powers, weaponry, wishful thinking or pseudo-science will make our streets safe again; only an end to prohibition can do that. How much longer are we willing to foolishly risk our own survival by continuing to ignore the obvious, historically confirmed solution?  
 
If you support prohibition then you&#039;re doing nothing but helping evolve local gangs into transnational enterprises with intricate power structures that reach into every corner of society, controlling vast swaths of territory with significant social and military resources at their disposal. 
 
There are just three groups of people who still believe in drug prohibition: 
 
1. Fairly retarded true believers; ignorant Calvinists that have never lost their vindictive fervor for punitive hatred and who actually think it&#039;s better that way. They get high on their own stupidity while protesting the taking of any non-liquid intoxicants. 
 
2. Those who profit from the law enforcement/ prison industrial complex. 
 
3. Those who profit from the manufacture, sale, and distribution of prohibited drugs. 
 
The thing that&#039;s really important to keep in mind is that the second group is oftentimes inexorably intertwined with the third group, while they both pretend to be part of the first group. 
 
No amount of money, police powers, weaponry, wishful thinking or pseudo-science will make our streets safe again; only an end to prohibition can do that. How much longer are we willing to foolishly risk our own survival by continuing to ignore the obvious, historically confirmed solution? 
 
If you support prohibition then you&#039;ve helped trigger the worst crime wave in history. 
 
If you support prohibition you&#039;ve a helped create a black market with massive incentives to hook both adults and children alike. 
 
If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped to make these dangerous substances available in schools and prisons. 
 
If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped raise gang warfare to a level not seen since the days of alcohol bootlegging. 
 
If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped create the prison-for-profit synergy with drug lords. 
 
If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped remove many important civil liberties from those citizens you falsely claim to represent. 
 
If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped put previously unknown and contaminated drugs on the streets. 
 
If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped to escalate Theft, Muggings and Burglaries. 
 
If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped to divert scarce law-enforcement resources away from protecting your fellow citizens from the ever escalating violence against their person or property. 
 
If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped overcrowd the courts and prisons, thus making it increasingly impossible to curtail the people who are hurting and terrorizing others. 
 
If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped evolve local gangs into transnational enterprises with intricate power structures that reach into every corner of society, controlling vast swaths of territory with significant social and military resources at their disposal. 
 
If you support prohibition then prepare yourself for even more death, corruption, sickness, imprisonment, unemployment, foreclosed homes, and the complete loss of the rule of law and the Bill of Rights. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The war on drugs is a tale of a once great and free nation which fell down a rat hole into a fantasy world riddled with peculiar and dystopian logic.  </p>
<p>No amount of money, police powers, weaponry, wishful thinking or pseudo-science will make our streets safe again; only an end to prohibition can do that. How much longer are we willing to foolishly risk our own survival by continuing to ignore the obvious, historically confirmed solution?  </p>
<p>If you support prohibition then you&#039;re doing nothing but helping evolve local gangs into transnational enterprises with intricate power structures that reach into every corner of society, controlling vast swaths of territory with significant social and military resources at their disposal. </p>
<p>There are just three groups of people who still believe in drug prohibition: </p>
<p>1. Fairly retarded true believers; ignorant Calvinists that have never lost their vindictive fervor for punitive hatred and who actually think it&#039;s better that way. They get high on their own stupidity while protesting the taking of any non-liquid intoxicants. </p>
<p>2. Those who profit from the law enforcement/ prison industrial complex. </p>
<p>3. Those who profit from the manufacture, sale, and distribution of prohibited drugs. </p>
<p>The thing that&#039;s really important to keep in mind is that the second group is oftentimes inexorably intertwined with the third group, while they both pretend to be part of the first group. </p>
<p>No amount of money, police powers, weaponry, wishful thinking or pseudo-science will make our streets safe again; only an end to prohibition can do that. How much longer are we willing to foolishly risk our own survival by continuing to ignore the obvious, historically confirmed solution? </p>
<p>If you support prohibition then you&#039;ve helped trigger the worst crime wave in history. </p>
<p>If you support prohibition you&#039;ve a helped create a black market with massive incentives to hook both adults and children alike. </p>
<p>If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped to make these dangerous substances available in schools and prisons. </p>
<p>If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped raise gang warfare to a level not seen since the days of alcohol bootlegging. </p>
<p>If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped create the prison-for-profit synergy with drug lords. </p>
<p>If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped remove many important civil liberties from those citizens you falsely claim to represent. </p>
<p>If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped put previously unknown and contaminated drugs on the streets. </p>
<p>If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped to escalate Theft, Muggings and Burglaries. </p>
<p>If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped to divert scarce law-enforcement resources away from protecting your fellow citizens from the ever escalating violence against their person or property. </p>
<p>If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped overcrowd the courts and prisons, thus making it increasingly impossible to curtail the people who are hurting and terrorizing others. </p>
<p>If you support prohibition you&#039;ve helped evolve local gangs into transnational enterprises with intricate power structures that reach into every corner of society, controlling vast swaths of territory with significant social and military resources at their disposal. </p>
<p>If you support prohibition then prepare yourself for even more death, corruption, sickness, imprisonment, unemployment, foreclosed homes, and the complete loss of the rule of law and the Bill of Rights. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lynch</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/25/roger-clemens-should-plead-the-10th/comment-page-1/#comment-331933</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6643#comment-331933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a great  exemplification of the abuse of our constitution by the power hungry elete! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great  exemplification of the abuse of our constitution by the power hungry elete! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Clemens Should Plead the 10th! &#171; Secession and Nullification â€” News &#38; Information</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/25/roger-clemens-should-plead-the-10th/comment-page-1/#comment-331859</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Clemens Should Plead the 10th! &#171; Secession and Nullification â€” News &#38; Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6643#comment-331859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Clemens Should Plead the&#160;10th!  Posted on August 26, 2010 by Bill Miller   This article by Downsize DC on TenthAmendmentCenter.com. The baseball pitcher, Roger Clemens, is in the news. He has been charged with the supposed crime [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clemens Should Plead the&nbsp;10th!  Posted on August 26, 2010 by Bill Miller   This article by Downsize DC on TenthAmendmentCenter.com. The baseball pitcher, Roger Clemens, is in the news. He has been charged with the supposed crime [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philosopherking</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/25/roger-clemens-should-plead-the-10th/comment-page-1/#comment-331822</link>
		<dc:creator>Philosopherking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 06:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6643#comment-331822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was beginning to wonder myself what power they had to hold hearing since only the judicial branch can do that.   It should makes us wonder the danger we are in because if they can hold hearings then they can try people who break the laws.   Who will dare declare their own creations unconstitutional then?    ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was beginning to wonder myself what power they had to hold hearing since only the judicial branch can do that.   It should makes us wonder the danger we are in because if they can hold hearings then they can try people who break the laws.   Who will dare declare their own creations unconstitutional then?    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelBoldin</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/25/roger-clemens-should-plead-the-10th/comment-page-1/#comment-331773</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelBoldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6643#comment-331773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[even in its broadest sense, the ability to do what they&#039;re doing is nonsense.  Great article from DDC! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even in its broadest sense, the ability to do what they&#039;re doing is nonsense.  Great article from DDC! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TextualistDude</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/25/roger-clemens-should-plead-the-10th/comment-page-1/#comment-331739</link>
		<dc:creator>TextualistDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6643#comment-331739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The commerce clause is a mess.  The word &#039;regulate&#039; was meant to &#039;make regular&#039; in the VERY big sense of import tariffs, blockades, favoritism, etc. (along the lines of trade wars among nations).  It was not intended to allow federal micro-management of every transaction in the nation. 
 
I have a unique interpretation of the commerce clause that shuts it down to just transactions involving STATES but I don&#039;t have the energy to defend it here yet again.  Sadly, the language in the commerce clause practically begs the power-mad people in Washington to use it for virtually everything. 
 
Every time I read of its use for crap like this (baseball!), I see red!!! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The commerce clause is a mess.  The word &#039;regulate&#039; was meant to &#039;make regular&#039; in the VERY big sense of import tariffs, blockades, favoritism, etc. (along the lines of trade wars among nations).  It was not intended to allow federal micro-management of every transaction in the nation. </p>
<p>I have a unique interpretation of the commerce clause that shuts it down to just transactions involving STATES but I don&#039;t have the energy to defend it here yet again.  Sadly, the language in the commerce clause practically begs the power-mad people in Washington to use it for virtually everything. </p>
<p>Every time I read of its use for crap like this (baseball!), I see red!!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
