Obamacare? We Should Have Seen You Coming

  • Share on Tumblr

by Tim Reeves

Many readers of this site may find what happened in late March to be unbelievable.  They may wonder how the paradigm was set that the Federal Government has no bounds to its authority whatsoever. 

This is the product of naiveté, as conservatives turned a blind eye to President Bush’s Medicare Part D expansion, the U.S. Patriot Act, and budget-busting deficits as far back as the eye can see. 

Indeed, republican presidents seem to use the somewhat stronger affinity of their party towards a smaller government as a kind of cover to allow them to expand the government beyond the bounds it had prior to their presidency.

Not that the other statists are any better, but when they expand the government they say ‘I am going to expand government so that more people are dependent upon it’ – such as the “Obamacare” bill.  In 4 years (the delay was primarily so the Congressional Budget Office score would come in better) people will start expecting the government to take care of their every medical need. 

Any person at that point who tries to do any reform or cost cutting will be viewed as a tyrant, intent on denying the most needy among us our (entitled) health care.  At that point it will be too late to save the American republic.

When the full affects of Obamacare are in play, health insurance companies will become just a Government-sponsored entity. They will have the responsibility to provide care for any applicants- without the possibility of denying coverage. At this point, the risk pool will expand exponentially (as they will be required to provide for any request, from any citizen, for any procedure). 

In tandem with this expansion of requirements for benefits, they will be denied any rate increase to cover the increased risk. There are only two possibilities:

1.  The “private” insurers will go bankrupt, leaving all of their insure-ees as medical wards of the state.  These people will have to join a Government Plan (once all the private insurers are bankrupt) as it will be clear there is no money to be made in the health insurance market. So, no new companies will be started to take the place of the old ones.

2.  The “private” insurers will have to go begging to the Government to allow them to raise rates.  This will cause all citizens of the country to pay more for health insurance than they previously did, and would also be on top of the already higher taxes we will be paying to provide care for the poor.  The healthy young who previously had declined coverage, or had a high deductible plan, will pay the most for this- as they will now have to have an “approved” plan.

The budgetary effects of this expansion hardly need to be mentioned.  The U.S Government will, in short order, end up being the provider of all medical benefits.  Initially there will be no restraint in the spending, whatsoever.  This will cause demand for medical services (which will be perceived as free) to skyrocket. 

The law of supply and demand still applies, so with no increase in the supply of doctors or medicine (and most likely a decrease) the price will increase proportionately to the increase in supply.  Since the insurance companies will all be bankrupt in short order, the Federal budget will ultimately pay for all of this expansion.

This will bring us to rationing. With a limited supply of doctors/medicine, the Federal Govt. will have to decide which medical proceedures are worth doing and which should be (indefinitely) delayed.  The rational basis that these decisions will have to be made on is:  The person with a higher likelyhood of actually contributing to the tax base will have first crack at service, along with the political elite.  This rationing will also result in a near halt to all medical “breakthrough treatments,” as these will be viewed by Bio-tech companies as unprofitable to pursue.

This is all due to the process of “nationalization” of our politics that has been going on since the Civil War.  Think about it, if this was just on a state-by-state basis…for example, just in Oregon or Massachusetts, these would not be the same kind of problem (and as a side note- they would be constitutional, whether good policy or not) because the other states would be able to pick up the slack and allow citizens an escape hatch. 

If our Senators were still appointed by the statehouses (as originally intended) they would have stopped Obamacare (as it is the Mother of all unfunded mandates). If we were still on the Gold standard, no one in Washington would dare propose such a plan- as there would be no magical Federal Reserve Bank to get an unlimited source of funds for any fantasy that politicians dream up.  If states were still willing to nullify unconstitutional laws, D.C. would be less bold in proposing laws which are clearly outside the enumerated powers possessed by the Federal Government.  I won’t even address the Supreme Court, as they are not the only arbiters of what is constitutional.

Republicans seem to want to repeal this law and replace it (probably with something less socialistic).  This is unlikely- and even if it happens, it would be only a delay of the inevitable.  The statists will be in power again, and when they are, this same fight will happen all over again.  No national redress is truly available. 

The only way forward is to nullify through the statehouses. If we are to pull this one out, we will have to nullify this law. There is no other option.

Remember in 1994 when “Hillarycare” was defeated?  Everyone breathed a sigh of relief. How about when Truman proposed it?  Government structured as a national democracy (as it is) always tends towards socialism. 

Indeed if the bill had been defeated in D.C. this time, it would only be a matter of time before it was attempted again.  This is because citizens will always vote for politicians who promise the expensive entitlements that will lead to debt slavery for their children. 

reclaiming-american-revolutionWe need to reinvigorate the State Governments to nullify unconstitutional acts by Congress, and we need to do it now before the outrage felt in the electorate fades into comfort/complacency.  Only in this way can we permanently put the Government on solid footing.

The Tenth Amendment Center has produced a model nullification law which I have linked here: http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/legislation/federal-health-care-nullification-act/
Everyone who reads this post needs to call their state Representatives/Senators/Governors and demand that they introduce this bill in the next session of legislature.  If this passes- along with other states, your state can be part of the solution.

Tim Reeves is the State Chapter Coordinator for the Oregon Tenth Amendment Center.

Copyright © 2010 by TenthAmendmentCenter.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?

,

16 comments
fredzogarand
fredzogarand

The Obamaites will continue to destroy our rights and bastardize the constitution as long as you lazy liberal whiners sit on your ass and do nothing. Obamas change is rapidly destroying this country and the best way to stop it is to FIGHT this change. Read the 10th amendment and ask yourself if we have no recourse. We the people ALWAYS have a way out because we are in charge NOT the feds and it is time to let them know who is in charge. This November get off your duff and VOTE THEM OUT. It will not cure the infection of socialism but it is a start. It will take years but we the people will re-take our republic but not by whining about what we can't do. The feds are nothing without us as their power comes from us and the states so when the states say NO MORE their is little they can do. Stop whining and FIGHT.

bmsondergeld
bmsondergeld

As far as I can tell, Obamacare cannot be effectively nullified by the states. Congress was smart (devious) enough to use the tax system to implement things. What Obamacare did was place a tax on every person in the US. If you get health insurance, they'll give you a tax credit to offset the charge. There will be no one checking to see if you have health insurance and fining those lacking - we essentially have to ask congress for the credit when we file our taxes. There is nothing for the states to nullify, no way I can see to get around this. Congress has the power to tax, and the most we can do is to not accept their tax credit if we have insurance - which no one will do. Nullification can't affect Obamacare at all.

Mary
Mary

Combine this with everything else they have done since 2009, including the recent "we won't nuke you remarks.." and it is obvious he is attempting to down the USA from the inside. Many warned "from the inside" would happen if he were elected. It will all become reversed and defunded come the november elections.

MichaelBoldin
MichaelBoldin

what the heck do you mean about the we won't nuke you remarks? that might be the only sane thing this crook has done. But, at the same time, he said he would use nukes against iran and north korea. Incinerating a coule hundred thousand people in a few seconds is acceptable to you? Disgusting.

George Hall
George Hall

I agree with your point about the 17th amendment. If Senators had to go in front of their state legislature after voting for a huge unfunded mandate they would be voted out. For states to truly defend their sovereignty they must have the representation that the constitution originally gave them, Senators elected by the states. Congress won't do it, so call for a convention, repeal the 17th amendment.

MichaelBoldin
MichaelBoldin

Would they be voted out? what do you base that on - this ideal that State legislatures are all fiscally sound or something? I don't buy it....

B. Johnson
B. Johnson

Regarding the 17th A., until it is repealed, why don't state legislators do the following? Why don't they publicly support candidates for the federal senate, candidates who they trust will use their legislative votes to protect state interests?

Also, state lawmakers need to make recall laws to enable voters to get rid of federal lawmakers who show that they cannot be trusted.

Douglas Baggett
Douglas Baggett

Part of the issue (it seems) is that State legislatures don't oppose the Federal Government because they don't want to be RESPONSIBLE for Federal Actions. Right now they can say "not our fault. That's the Federal Government". I think State politicians that don't care about the Federal Authority are just fine with the Status Quo as long as actions that the Federal Government take don't jeopardize their own political power (Directly by Supreme Court or Indirectly by making them look bad to their constituents by not standing up for State's rights).

MichaelBoldin
MichaelBoldin

I think you've made some good observations on this big problem....

Douglas Baggett
Douglas Baggett

Nullification is all the rage, but suppose the Federal Government calls States bluff and says "we ignore your nullification and will fine people anyway." What are the States going to do? Have State troopers defend citizens when Federal Marshalls come to their houses to arrest them for not paying health care insurance fines?

theunknownamerican
theunknownamerican

You have an interesting point that the fed could just run in and enforce those laws but you forget that human beings in power respect the power of other human beings. This why they are reluctant just to ignore state authority when that state authority conflicts with their own wishes.

MichaelBoldin
MichaelBoldin

That IS what they do, Douglas....they never recognize nullification efforts. But, in practice, when enough of us resist, the fines and arrests will subside.

timothy.reeves
timothy.reeves

A proper nullification (such as the bill linked here includes penalties for federal agents enforcing illegal laws within the bounds of the state, fine, and/or imprisonment is in order. Short of a military invasion the federal govt. does not have the manpower to enforce laws without the states consent, and assistance. Add in a few more states, and it is unthinkable to "call our bluff"

Douglas Baggett
Douglas Baggett

All it takes is the Federal Government to put the slam down on 2 or 3 states to make the rest fall in line (I'm being cynical here I know). Let's not forget what happened the last time states tried to refuse the Federal Government in the 50's.

Madison
Madison

Well, have the Feds smacked the states that resisted the REAL ID act?

The states basically effectively nullified that act.

MichaelBoldin
MichaelBoldin

Douglas - you seem to be missing some important recent history, which makes your fear of the feds more realistic.

The feds have done very little, overall, to the 14 states that have been refusing to comply with federal drug laws - some of them for well-over 10 years.

The feds have virtually nothing, whatsoever, to the 20+ states that have refused to comply with the 2005 real id act. They, instead, are crumbling under the peaceful resistance.

Will they do the same on health care? Tough to say, but it is possible if enough people refuse to comply.

Trackbacks

  1. Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by libertyideals: Obamacare? We Should Have Seen You Coming #libertarian http://bit.ly/cGJT36

  2. [...] Obamacare? We Should Have Seen You Coming | Tenth Amendment Center. Share and [...]

  3. [...] Obamacare? We Should Have Seen You Coming [...]