A New Age of Jefferson: New Hampshire’s “Free Staters” started it all

  • Share on Tumblr

free-state-projectBy Bernie Quigley

At the beginning of every movement is a wild bunch. Rowdy workers on the docks in Boston, John Brown and his half-mad family. When historians trace back from Scott Brown to the beginning, they will get to a wild bunch in New Hampshire called the “Free Staters.”

They moved here a few years back and live on the edge of the forest, not more than a handful at first but expecting thousands to follow, intending to start the republic fresh again. And in a way they did. I came to their attention with an article in 2003 titled “A States’ Rights Defense against Dick Cheney” premised on Thomas Jefferson’s Kentucky Resolutions, making the claim that New Hampshire and Vermont need not participate in the war on Iraq without the permission of our state governors.

They had moved up here drawn to our state motto, I think – Live Free or Die. But it was no big ideological thing, more a free-spirited awakening which brought the usual scoffs from the lace curtain MSM and conventional political religionists here in the cold where local politics sometimes seems a substitute for religion. I received an email from one blithe spirit who said that she was basically about “ . . . opposing gun laws, legalizing marijuana and Hillary is a bitch.”

What we had in common was the premise that Thomas Jefferson had recognized the natural state that formed of its own initiative when ideology was removed from the equation. And acknowledged that in the Constitution by declaring that the states had the natural right and the ability to defend themselves against an abusive, arrogant, immoral or delirious federal government.

From then till now, this idea has taken off. I think now it cannot be held back. It will bring us a new breed of politician and a new political generation. It is already doing so.

This thinking first began to move last February when Dan Itse, a New Hampshire state representative, read commentary related to Jefferson and the Kentucky Resolutions and proposed a 10th amendment defense against the Obama administration’s deficit spending; spending so extensive that it would tax future generations. 37 other states immediately followed his initiative.

Then again on April 15, 2009, when the Tea Party revolts started across the country. When Texas governor Rick Perry appeared at one at the Alamo it brought greater legitimacy to this movement. His friend Ted Nugent brought his own inimitable style. Sarah Palin undoubtedly brought this movement nationally when she led support of other governors to the NY 23 race, bridging the Tea Partiers and the mainstream.

Mainstream conservatives and the Tea Partiers need to merge, Palin told Fox’s Greta Van Susteren. “Definitely, they need to merge. I think those who are wanting the divisions and the divisiveness and the controversy — those are the ones who don’t believe in the message. And they’re the ones, I think, stirring it up.”
They have already merged.

The election of Bob McDonnell as Virginia’s governor completed this transformation and fully legitimized the Jeffersonian ideals in Jefferson’s home state. This can be seen now as the new mainstream. The election of Scott Brown insured that Massachusetts and the East would not be left out.

In his speech in response to President Obama’s State of the Union, McDonnell made several references to the singular man of the Enlightenment who awakened the world: “It was Thomas Jefferson who called for ‘A wise and frugal Government which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry ….and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned…’ He was right.”

reclaiming-american-revolutionJefferson could awaken us again in 2010 and 2012. And it all started up here in woods of New Hampshire with the Free Staters. Never underestimate the power of a handful of rural red necks, duty-bound, born-again to the Constitution and hell-bent on a free vision of starting the world again. ‘Twas ever thus.

Bernie Quigley [send him email] writes a “Pundit’s Blog” column for “The Hill,” political journal in Washington, D.C. He is a prize-winning writer and has worked more than 30 years as a book and magazine editor, political commentator and book, movie, music and art reviewer. He lives in the White Mountains with his wife and four children.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?

, ,

14 comments
dave
dave

I find it utterly amazing when I hear someone say something negative about ron paul, I mean he's the living emdodiement of the constitution. Not liking rp is like not liking the constitution. Of course, given that public education (an oximoron if i ever heard 1) does not educate on the constitution I guess it shouldn't surprise me.

Will May
Will May

This is just the beginning of the Free State Project. Expect to see more and more awesome activism as more people move. New Hampshire is the cutting edge of modern libertarianism.

Larry
Larry

Unfortunately the tea party "movement" has failed. It has been taken over by Neo-Con (Marxist) Republicans.

TxTenther
TxTenther

I'm a member of the tea party movement here in Texas and, I gotta tell you, I don't know anyone involved who supports Ron Paul. I sure as hell don't.

domingo
domingo

It is obvious that you do not know as many as you should. When you say "I sure as hell don't" support Ron Paul,
I sure as hell know that you are in the minority.

Chip Wright
Chip Wright

the Tea Party movement follows Ron Paul, and has no need of Neocons like Rick Perry or Sarah Palin. The GOP is trying to hijack the Tea Party movement and bend it to support expanding government, war mongering, and corporatism. Please do not extend the myth that Palin or Perry have any legitimacy to the Tea Partiers.

MichaelBoldin
MichaelBoldin

People like Palin, Perry, and many others - are followed by many who are in opposition to the federal government - by many who consider themselves Tea Partiers. The author here simply points out how this movement is so strong that it's reached mainstream appeal.

I've talked with plenty of those people myself. The key, of course, if you. You need to reach out to those people and point out what else there is to learn about the constitution - and make clear that the problems we face today certainly didn't start in January 2009.

In my opinion, it's better to welcome and educate than shun people.

Jason - Dallas
Jason - Dallas

"In my opinion, it's better to welcome and educate than shun people."

Inclusion is the ONLY way to get moving on states rights. To "shun" people only limits your voice. We need Ron Paul, Palin, and whoever is the next elected governor of the state of Texas.

The hardest part of the movement isn't educating the masses, it is finding politicians who truly adhere to the thoughts of a more powerful state vs federal government. It takes a noble leader to transfer power back to its origins.

Let's assume the most Libertarian minded current politician (Ron Paul) were to run and get elected President. Upon completing the transfer of power, it would take at least a generation of like minded patriotic politicians to move the country back to its foundation. ANY single new power grabbing dictator could alter the course back to the wrong path we are currently traveling on. That part is my kids responsibility should this whole movement be successful, that's where the education would be most beneficial. Indoctrinating young should be used and is stealing a play from the liberal playbook.

Dick Bates
Dick Bates

"The problem is: The public officials we have now days pay only lip service to the Oath of Office."

I really think we are seeing this problem addressed with the likes of Scott Brown and Chris Christie. Good times!

MichaelBoldin
MichaelBoldin

Time will tell - for years, people have cheered on the election of someone new, some maverick who'd actually follow the constitution. Will Scott Brown and Chris Christie be strict constitutionalist - in EVERY situation? I seriously doubt it, but hope I'm wrong.

Tommy W. Cartwright
Tommy W. Cartwright

Citizens For Accountability

A grass roots organization

The problem is: The public officials we have now days pay only lip service to the Oath of Office.

Our goal is to have all public officials honor their Oath of Office. How do we do this? By implementing these five steps:

1.Hold all public officials accountable to the Oath of Office under law.

2.Put the fear of the wrath of God back into the Oath of Office.

3.Hold public officials responsible for any damages incurred by their decision to violate their sacred Oath of Office.

4.Enforce the penalties for violating the Oath of Office; by making the penalties so sever that all public officials, who swear an oath, will not want to violate their solemn Oath of Office.

5.Make the choice of holding a public office an honor rather than a right.

Contact Information:

Tommy W. Cartwright
775-463-9153

Jim Dunlap:
775-463-3718
Make it happen! Hold your public officials accountable, if they break the law prosecute them!