Comments on: Liberty or Unlimited Submission: You Decide

By: Bill Hare

Bill Hare — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 01:39:40 +0000

With the obvious, long-standing and continued Federal encroachment upon state sovereignty, citizens and state leaders must understand the proper, "original" Constitutional hierarchy between the States and Federal government.

The future battle for Liberty lies here.

In my mind, people need to start thinking of themselves as State citizens first and move forward from that perspective.
Towards that end, my recommendation is for all Liberty seekers to PURCHASE and FLY your respective State flag.
This is a great way to express your state sovereignty "mindset" as well as an open sign of camaraderie with other tenthers.

By: Liberty or Unlimited Submission: You Decide | The Ruthless Truth blog

Liberty or Unlimited Submission: You Decide | The Ruthless Truth blog — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:22:20 +0000

[...] http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/12/28/liberty-or-unlimited-submission-you-decide/ Easy AdSense by Unreal Bookmark It Hide Sites [...]

By: Ruth Ann Wilson

Ruth Ann Wilson — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:18:34 +0000

NO CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS, NOT AT THE STATE LEVEL, FEDERAL LEVEL, NOT AT ANY LEVEL.
Leave the Constitutionals alone. They came from men “who loved their people and they had the fear of God in their hearts”.
Stand on the DECLARATION OF RIGHTS, in these LEGAL DOCUMENTS. Remind the Courts and the Legislators, we have FOUNDATIONS, “precedent case law” does not supersede
our Constitutions especially the Declaration of Rights.

For God & Country
Ruth Ann Wilson

By: scragsma

scragsma — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:17:08 +0000

Just a factual correction: Martin Luther didn't tack the 95 Theses to a door in the Vatican, but to the door of a church in Germany.

By: BryceShonka

BryceShonka — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:48:12 +0000

In order for the strategy of tax resistance to make sense, each state would have to be confident that the other states would follow through. Such a tactic would meet a swift ending if only a few states actually went through with it and withheld funds from the Feds, as those few states would be singled out and heavily pressured by DC.

By: U.S. Knew of “Nigerian” and C.I.A. Made a Report on Suspect, so Obama Goes Golfing Amid Stimulus Money Being Spent on Tennis Courts « Gospel of Jesus Christ, The Gift of Eternal Life

Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:37:15 +0000

[...] Give Me Liberty or End Up With Unlimited Submission: You Decide [...]

By: Dave

Dave — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:13:02 +0000

Michael,
You are awesome, and I apprieciate your work. The mark of relevent editorials are those that boil down to the unknown. Reality is too painfull, so apparently, a distaction is needed. And life goes on. THANKYOU!

By: Dave

Dave — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:04:26 +0000

Religion does not necessarily equal morality. In my life I have encountered highly religeous scumbags and low lifes who turn out to be highly moral, and all in between. It seems as if the two have no correlation.

By: MichaelBoldin

MichaelBoldin — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:08:49 +0000

"why not let the religious lady have her say."

She does have her say, and repeats something similar on this website almost every time she comments. I pointed out my disagreement, and asked – not required – something more on-topic. Speaking of which – we feel it's absolutely necessary to get active on a state-level instead of a federal level. Any thoughts on that?

By: Jahn Petrovsky

Jahn Petrovsky — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:01:19 +0000

MBoldin–why not let the religious lady have her say.

Some people–say, George Washington for instance–thought that the structure of their new American civilization stood upon the good morals of the populace, and that those morals, as a practical matter, were vouchsafed to all through widespread religious practice. General irreligiousity is incompatible with their plans for a Republic.

Just because Tom Paine and atheists are welcome exceptions to the general rule that a religious and moral people is required to make things work doesn't mean the lady is wrong about the majority.

So a hearty welcome to the views both of Mr. Vasquez and Mrs. Wilson, says I.