<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Federal Reserve vs the Constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/24/the-federal-reserve-vs-the-constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/24/the-federal-reserve-vs-the-constitution/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 12:10:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PRESIDENT OBAMA TAKES THE OATH OF OFFICE AT THE U.S. CAPITOL AND DELIVERS HIS SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS JANUARY 21, 2013 &#171; sreaves32</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/24/the-federal-reserve-vs-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-927086</link>
		<dc:creator>PRESIDENT OBAMA TAKES THE OATH OF OFFICE AT THE U.S. CAPITOL AND DELIVERS HIS SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS JANUARY 21, 2013 &#171; sreaves32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3110#comment-927086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] further empowers the bankster’s preferred cartel, the Federal Reserve (which has engaged in unconstitutional activity for nearly a hundred [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] further empowers the bankster’s preferred cartel, the Federal Reserve (which has engaged in unconstitutional activity for nearly a hundred [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cities Around the Country Ditch the US Dollar – The Liberty Paper</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/24/the-federal-reserve-vs-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-925463</link>
		<dc:creator>Cities Around the Country Ditch the US Dollar – The Liberty Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3110#comment-925463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] its first real taste of unconstitutional corporatism. Congress enacted the Federal Reserve, yet did not have the constitutional power to do so. However, with the Rothschild family&#8217;s influence over Congress two days before Christmas when [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] its first real taste of unconstitutional corporatism. Congress enacted the Federal Reserve, yet did not have the constitutional power to do so. However, with the Rothschild family&#8217;s influence over Congress two days before Christmas when [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Germany Withdrew 1000 Tons of Gold from London in 2000-01 / P-word at PMQs &#171; paulthepaperbear</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/24/the-federal-reserve-vs-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-924701</link>
		<dc:creator>Germany Withdrew 1000 Tons of Gold from London in 2000-01 / P-word at PMQs &#171; paulthepaperbear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3110#comment-924701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/24/the-federal-reserve-vs-the-constitution/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/24/the-federal-reserve-vs-the-constitution/" rel="nofollow">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/24/the-federal-reserve-vs-the-constitution/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gold is Freedom &#124; Liberty Trip</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/24/the-federal-reserve-vs-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-924070</link>
		<dc:creator>Gold is Freedom &#124; Liberty Trip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3110#comment-924070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] There is also the question of how to prevent government, or something like the current federal reserve, from cheating. This is an important question because, historically, that is what government has always done. My personal opinion is that the only solution to this problem is that the banking system must be 100% private. What&#8217;s interesting here is that you can argue that the Constitution already forbids the existence of the federal reserve. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is also the question of how to prevent government, or something like the current federal reserve, from cheating. This is an important question because, historically, that is what government has always done. My personal opinion is that the only solution to this problem is that the banking system must be 100% private. What&#8217;s interesting here is that you can argue that the Constitution already forbids the existence of the federal reserve. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hang The Bankers &#124; He Who Controls the Money Supply, Controls the World &#187; Impeach Obama 2012: national campaign begins</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/24/the-federal-reserve-vs-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-913014</link>
		<dc:creator>Hang The Bankers &#124; He Who Controls the Money Supply, Controls the World &#187; Impeach Obama 2012: national campaign begins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3110#comment-913014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] also further empowers the bankster’s preferred cartel, the Federal Reserve (which has engaged inunconstitutional activity for nearly a hundred [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also further empowers the bankster’s preferred cartel, the Federal Reserve (which has engaged inunconstitutional activity for nearly a hundred [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CITIZENS DEMAND INVESTIGATION INTO OBAMA ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PRESIDENT AND SECOND TERM RUN &#171; sreaves32</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/24/the-federal-reserve-vs-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-912964</link>
		<dc:creator>CITIZENS DEMAND INVESTIGATION INTO OBAMA ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PRESIDENT AND SECOND TERM RUN &#171; sreaves32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3110#comment-912964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] also further empowers the bankster’s preferred cartel, the Federal Reserve (which has engaged in unconstitutional activity for nearly a hundred [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also further empowers the bankster’s preferred cartel, the Federal Reserve (which has engaged in unconstitutional activity for nearly a hundred [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianMcCandliss</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/24/the-federal-reserve-vs-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-908084</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianMcCandliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3110#comment-908084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The Congress has no authority to delegate (further) the authority delegated to them in Article I of the Constitution.&quot;

 

As always, the term &quot;delelegate&quot; is often confused with SURRENDER-- just as with the People of the states delegating powers to the federal government, is taken as a permanent  surrender of those powers, as when the Jackson administration authorized the use of military force against the individual states, and the Lincoln Administration carried out such.

 

However in reality, &quot;delegation&quot; in the Constitution refers to authorizing a subordinate to carry out orderso-- not not giving away the power to an independent or superior body. For example, a manager may delegate authority to an employee, but it always subject to oversight by the manager or a superior.

 

Here, the federal government  SURRENDERED power to an independent body over which is not directly subordinate to any branch of government-- and did so through normal legislative process, and not by Constitutional Amndment.

 

This not only breaches separation of powers, but breaches the Constitution altogether by usurpation of clearly extra-constitutional authority, exercising congressional power without direct congressional oversight.

 

However once the federal government usurped the power to coerce the states through military invasion, it suppressed their power of sovereign recourse; and as Madison and Jefferson warned, this made the federal government into the supreme and final  judge ot its own powers-- since no other power could stand against it.

So essentially the die was cast under the Lincoln Administration; and the Federal Reserve was simply a matter of  time and tide-- as with all other federal abuses, i.e. since the states have no recourse against them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Congress has no authority to delegate (further) the authority delegated to them in Article I of the Constitution.&#8221;</p>
<p>As always, the term &#8220;delelegate&#8221; is often confused with SURRENDER&#8211; just as with the People of the states delegating powers to the federal government, is taken as a permanent  surrender of those powers, as when the Jackson administration authorized the use of military force against the individual states, and the Lincoln Administration carried out such.</p>
<p>However in reality, &#8220;delegation&#8221; in the Constitution refers to authorizing a subordinate to carry out orderso&#8211; not not giving away the power to an independent or superior body. For example, a manager may delegate authority to an employee, but it always subject to oversight by the manager or a superior.</p>
<p>Here, the federal government  SURRENDERED power to an independent body over which is not directly subordinate to any branch of government&#8211; and did so through normal legislative process, and not by Constitutional Amndment.</p>
<p>This not only breaches separation of powers, but breaches the Constitution altogether by usurpation of clearly extra-constitutional authority, exercising congressional power without direct congressional oversight.</p>
<p>However once the federal government usurped the power to coerce the states through military invasion, it suppressed their power of sovereign recourse; and as Madison and Jefferson warned, this made the federal government into the supreme and final  judge ot its own powers&#8211; since no other power could stand against it.</p>
<p>So essentially the die was cast under the Lincoln Administration; and the Federal Reserve was simply a matter of  time and tide&#8211; as with all other federal abuses, i.e. since the states have no recourse against them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; The Federal Reserve vs the Constitution</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/24/the-federal-reserve-vs-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-904021</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; The Federal Reserve vs the Constitution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3110#comment-904021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Federal Reserve vs the Constitution [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Federal Reserve vs the Constitution [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occupy Wall Street - Page 370 - Grasscity.com Forums</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/24/the-federal-reserve-vs-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-903857</link>
		<dc:creator>Occupy Wall Street - Page 370 - Grasscity.com Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 05:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3110#comment-903857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]    Something constitutional, I believe? (just place holding till someone intelligent comes along) The Federal Reserve vs the Constitution      __________________ &quot;There is no season when you are grown/You are always risen from the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]    Something constitutional, I believe? (just place holding till someone intelligent comes along) The Federal Reserve vs the Constitution      __________________ &quot;There is no season when you are grown/You are always risen from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The US is a good example of how well multiculturalism and immigration works - Page 5 - Stormfront</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/24/the-federal-reserve-vs-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-505205</link>
		<dc:creator>The US is a good example of how well multiculturalism and immigration works - Page 5 - Stormfront</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3110#comment-505205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of having the dollar as the world reserve currency being controlled by a private and arguably unconstitutional entity, e.g. The Federal Reserve.   Be that as it may, do you really expect anything better of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of having the dollar as the world reserve currency being controlled by a private and arguably unconstitutional entity, e.g. The Federal Reserve.   Be that as it may, do you really expect anything better of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
