<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pennsylvania to Consider Nullifying Some Federal Gun Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/17/pennsylvania-to-consider-nullifying-some-federal-gun-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/17/pennsylvania-to-consider-nullifying-some-federal-gun-laws/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:19:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; States&#8217; Rights Update: PA on Nullifying Federal Gun Laws; OH Senate Affirms 10th; More News</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/17/pennsylvania-to-consider-nullifying-some-federal-gun-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-928808</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; States&#8217; Rights Update: PA on Nullifying Federal Gun Laws; OH Senate Affirms 10th; More News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3071#comment-928808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of Pennsylvania became one of the latest States to formally introduce legislation potentially nullifying federal gun laws through their own Firearms Freedom [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Pennsylvania became one of the latest States to formally introduce legislation potentially nullifying federal gun laws through their own Firearms Freedom [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/17/pennsylvania-to-consider-nullifying-some-federal-gun-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-307386</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3071#comment-307386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corey,
Corbett is likely to sign it?  

SAM ROHRER WILL SIGN IT, as he WROTE the DARN THING.

SAM ROHRER, a hunter and sportsman, has been leading the fight on Constitutional issues for years. He is who we need as Governor!

NOT some stuffed shirt like Corbett who takes credit for everyone else&#039;s work]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey,<br />
Corbett is likely to sign it?  </p>
<p>SAM ROHRER WILL SIGN IT, as he WROTE the DARN THING.</p>
<p>SAM ROHRER, a hunter and sportsman, has been leading the fight on Constitutional issues for years. He is who we need as Governor!</p>
<p>NOT some stuffed shirt like Corbett who takes credit for everyone else&#8217;s work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/17/pennsylvania-to-consider-nullifying-some-federal-gun-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-299973</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3071#comment-299973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed Rendall is anti gun because he supports the semi automatic gun ban! But when Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania&#039;s attorney general becomes governor, he&#039;ll be likely to sign it and make sure the good law abiding citizens of Pennsylvania are protected from the tyrannical Obama Administration and his Democratic controlled congress! The most recent anti gun proposed legislation in the &quot;Big Spending&quot; congress is the gun show &quot;loophole&quot; closing act which does nothing more than Buerecratically outlaws gun shows! Hopefully Ron Paul will be elected president in 2012! Also, I&#039;m sure glass to see Tom Ridge aint runnin in the senate as a republican, know what i mean! Pat Toomey rules!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed Rendall is anti gun because he supports the semi automatic gun ban! But when Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania&#8217;s attorney general becomes governor, he&#8217;ll be likely to sign it and make sure the good law abiding citizens of Pennsylvania are protected from the tyrannical Obama Administration and his Democratic controlled congress! The most recent anti gun proposed legislation in the &#8220;Big Spending&#8221; congress is the gun show &#8220;loophole&#8221; closing act which does nothing more than Buerecratically outlaws gun shows! Hopefully Ron Paul will be elected president in 2012! Also, I&#8217;m sure glass to see Tom Ridge aint runnin in the senate as a republican, know what i mean! Pat Toomey rules!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert Borgins</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/17/pennsylvania-to-consider-nullifying-some-federal-gun-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-299409</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert Borgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3071#comment-299409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Second Amendment gives exclusive authority to the people of the different States to keep and bear arms.
Under this Amendment neither Congress nor the States are authorized to pass legislation regulating firearms.

The 10th Amendment clarifies the limited power of Congress and specifies all the additional powers granted to the people.

Moreover  this Amendment nullifies whatever Intestate Commerce Clause might have existed prior to the passage of the Amendments.

At any rate the original Interstate Commerce Clause it was meant to&quot; regulate&quot; Commerce and not to criminalize it!!!

Amendment 10 clearly removes this &quot;weapon&quot; from the dangerous hands of Congress.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Second Amendment gives exclusive authority to the people of the different States to keep and bear arms.<br />
Under this Amendment neither Congress nor the States are authorized to pass legislation regulating firearms.</p>
<p>The 10th Amendment clarifies the limited power of Congress and specifies all the additional powers granted to the people.</p>
<p>Moreover  this Amendment nullifies whatever Intestate Commerce Clause might have existed prior to the passage of the Amendments.</p>
<p>At any rate the original Interstate Commerce Clause it was meant to&#8221; regulate&#8221; Commerce and not to criminalize it!!!</p>
<p>Amendment 10 clearly removes this &#8220;weapon&#8221; from the dangerous hands of Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Boldin</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/17/pennsylvania-to-consider-nullifying-some-federal-gun-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-290869</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3071#comment-290869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeremy - the 10th is not there to &quot;defeat the 2nd&quot;  at all.  It&#039;s to keep the federal government out of state affairs.  period.

The Constitution doesn&#039;t apply to you, it doesn&#039;t apply to me, and it doesn&#039;t apply to any person at all.  It applies to the federal government (and in some small situations, state governments)

This bill is written not only to prevent the feds from enacting gun laws and regulations in PA, but also to set precedent on the Commerce clause, which is far bigger than just gun laws referenced in the bill.

Now - if you don&#039;t like the gun laws in your state, you should really get on top of your state officials to change those - or move the hell out of there!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy &#8211; the 10th is not there to &#8220;defeat the 2nd&#8221;  at all.  It&#8217;s to keep the federal government out of state affairs.  period.</p>
<p>The Constitution doesn&#8217;t apply to you, it doesn&#8217;t apply to me, and it doesn&#8217;t apply to any person at all.  It applies to the federal government (and in some small situations, state governments)</p>
<p>This bill is written not only to prevent the feds from enacting gun laws and regulations in PA, but also to set precedent on the Commerce clause, which is far bigger than just gun laws referenced in the bill.</p>
<p>Now &#8211; if you don&#8217;t like the gun laws in your state, you should really get on top of your state officials to change those &#8211; or move the hell out of there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/17/pennsylvania-to-consider-nullifying-some-federal-gun-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-290865</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3071#comment-290865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1-9 are federal laws, NOT state laws.  PA guns laws are much worse that Federal.  I cannot get a gun in PA but can in other states.  This would be terrible.  Wanting to use the tenth amendment to defeat the second is odd since the tenth pertains to things NOT covered in the first nine.  States should not be able to have ANY gun laws.  I should be able to carry a gun the same way in every state.  I should be able to drive with weapons in the car the same way in every state.  The same way that my fifth amendment law protects me IN EVERY STATE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1-9 are federal laws, NOT state laws.  PA guns laws are much worse that Federal.  I cannot get a gun in PA but can in other states.  This would be terrible.  Wanting to use the tenth amendment to defeat the second is odd since the tenth pertains to things NOT covered in the first nine.  States should not be able to have ANY gun laws.  I should be able to carry a gun the same way in every state.  I should be able to drive with weapons in the car the same way in every state.  The same way that my fifth amendment law protects me IN EVERY STATE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rep Sam Rohrer Considering Governor Bid - Page 2</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/17/pennsylvania-to-consider-nullifying-some-federal-gun-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-290261</link>
		<dc:creator>Rep Sam Rohrer Considering Governor Bid - Page 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3071#comment-290261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Rep Sam Rohrer Considering Governor Bid      Haha, I love it!  &#039;We&#039; are torn between Rohrer and Corbett who are both friends of the second amendment and NJ are either going to get the gun [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rep Sam Rohrer Considering Governor Bid      Haha, I love it!  &#8216;We&#8217; are torn between Rohrer and Corbett who are both friends of the second amendment and NJ are either going to get the gun [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One of the Worst Examples of Wasteful Spending &#124; Cities of Vision</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/17/pennsylvania-to-consider-nullifying-some-federal-gun-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-287115</link>
		<dc:creator>One of the Worst Examples of Wasteful Spending &#124; Cities of Vision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3071#comment-287115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Pennsylvania to Consider Nullifying Some Federal Gun Laws &#124; TenthÂ &#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pennsylvania to Consider Nullifying Some Federal Gun Laws | TenthÂ &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Barron</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/17/pennsylvania-to-consider-nullifying-some-federal-gun-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-285997</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Barron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3071#comment-285997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is in the will of the people of the several states in which sovereignty lies.The individual states of their very nature are inherently sovereign.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people

The 9th and 10th Amendments are Constitutional Laws.Inherent within these laws are certain conclusions that are certain.The Resolutions based on these amendments are not mere proposals but are in effect laws themselves and have the effect of law.

It should be noted that the Supreme Court rarely declares laws unconstitutional for violating the 10th Amendment.

The sovereign states have the right to interpose or resist the implementation of federal law,to nullify unconstitutional laws,and to secede.Furthermore the state legislatures have the authority to overrule any federal law it considers unconstitutional and can make it null and void.It has always had this right.This includes the Supreme Court.

One of the insurmountable difficulties is that the state courts are all of the same mindset as the federal courts and have forgotten their obligations to the states.Federal courts do not dictate to the state courts.

As far as the spending clause is concerned in bringing the states into line the Congress is doing this with the taxpayers&#039; dollars.There is no such thing as &quot;federal monies&quot;.To circumvent this the states need only withhold the so called federal income tax withheld from employees checks and from whatever other sources the federal government derives its so called &quot;monies&quot;

As far as the &quot;necessary and proper&quot;clause is concerned it is a mere redundancy.It did not imply that the federal government had any greater powers than those specifically stated[Alexander Hamilton]

Necessary and Proper Clause:
To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof

If this doesn&#039;t refer specifically and only to Art1 Sec8[and it does] then it[Congress] has failed in its duty to defend and protect the 9th and 10th Amendments since these are powers vested by this Constitution in the governing of the United States just as all the rest of the Amendments are involved in the governance of the United States. These two Amendments are critical in the governing of the United States.Perhaps its just as well they don&#039;t have anything to say and let the courts do the intruding which is constant,unwarranted,and unconstitutional.Each and every state participates in the governing of the United States through its representatives in Congress if you can call them that but on a federal level.The states still remain sovereignly supreme in their own right always.We are guaranteed under the Constitution a republican form of government.

As far as the Supremacy Clause is concerned the Constitution itself is the supreme law of the land and laws not made in pursuance thereof are unconstitutional.But who has the last say?
The States can determine for themselves whether a law is unconstitutional.And the authority for this comes from the 9th and 10 Amendments as well as the state legislatures.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is in the will of the people of the several states in which sovereignty lies.The individual states of their very nature are inherently sovereign.</p>
<p>Amendment IX</p>
<p>The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.</p>
<p>Amendment X</p>
<p>The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people</p>
<p>The 9th and 10th Amendments are Constitutional Laws.Inherent within these laws are certain conclusions that are certain.The Resolutions based on these amendments are not mere proposals but are in effect laws themselves and have the effect of law.</p>
<p>It should be noted that the Supreme Court rarely declares laws unconstitutional for violating the 10th Amendment.</p>
<p>The sovereign states have the right to interpose or resist the implementation of federal law,to nullify unconstitutional laws,and to secede.Furthermore the state legislatures have the authority to overrule any federal law it considers unconstitutional and can make it null and void.It has always had this right.This includes the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>One of the insurmountable difficulties is that the state courts are all of the same mindset as the federal courts and have forgotten their obligations to the states.Federal courts do not dictate to the state courts.</p>
<p>As far as the spending clause is concerned in bringing the states into line the Congress is doing this with the taxpayers&#8217; dollars.There is no such thing as &#8220;federal monies&#8221;.To circumvent this the states need only withhold the so called federal income tax withheld from employees checks and from whatever other sources the federal government derives its so called &#8220;monies&#8221;</p>
<p>As far as the &#8220;necessary and proper&#8221;clause is concerned it is a mere redundancy.It did not imply that the federal government had any greater powers than those specifically stated[Alexander Hamilton]</p>
<p>Necessary and Proper Clause:<br />
To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof</p>
<p>If this doesn&#8217;t refer specifically and only to Art1 Sec8[and it does] then it[Congress] has failed in its duty to defend and protect the 9th and 10th Amendments since these are powers vested by this Constitution in the governing of the United States just as all the rest of the Amendments are involved in the governance of the United States. These two Amendments are critical in the governing of the United States.Perhaps its just as well they don&#8217;t have anything to say and let the courts do the intruding which is constant,unwarranted,and unconstitutional.Each and every state participates in the governing of the United States through its representatives in Congress if you can call them that but on a federal level.The states still remain sovereignly supreme in their own right always.We are guaranteed under the Constitution a republican form of government.</p>
<p>As far as the Supremacy Clause is concerned the Constitution itself is the supreme law of the land and laws not made in pursuance thereof are unconstitutional.But who has the last say?<br />
The States can determine for themselves whether a law is unconstitutional.And the authority for this comes from the 9th and 10 Amendments as well as the state legislatures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firearms Freedom Act Introduced in Pennsylvania &#171; NWI Patriots Blog</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/17/pennsylvania-to-consider-nullifying-some-federal-gun-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-284423</link>
		<dc:creator>Firearms Freedom Act Introduced in Pennsylvania &#171; NWI Patriots Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3071#comment-284423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] From the Tenth Amendment Center, Pennsylvania to Consider Nullifying Some Federal Gun Laws [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From the Tenth Amendment Center, Pennsylvania to Consider Nullifying Some Federal Gun Laws [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
