<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decentralization for Socialists: A Brief Primer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/08/25/decentralization-for-socialists-a-brief-primer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/08/25/decentralization-for-socialists-a-brief-primer/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:05:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How Immediate Is Any Secession Talk? &#171; Info Ink</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/08/25/decentralization-for-socialists-a-brief-primer/comment-page-1/#comment-286686</link>
		<dc:creator>How Immediate Is Any Secession Talk? &#171; Info Ink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 07:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2856#comment-286686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A group calling itselfÂ  Tenth Amendment CenterÂ  is publishing articles that are notably slanted toward the the concept of secession. &#8220;Decentralization for Socialists: A Brief Primer,&#8221; reprinted from LewRockwell.com. The essay argued &#8220;a peaceful, just, and democratic solution to a centuries-old problem&#8221; would be to &#8220;[l]et the people of each sovereign state decide their own fate.&#8221; The essayist argued strongly in favor of &#8220;decentralization&#8221; and bemoaned &#8220;the amount of time the modern statists, particularly on the Left, spend labeling the idea of decentralization and secession as &#8216;kooky.&#8217; &#8221; [Tenth Amendment Center website, posted 8/25/09] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A group calling itselfÂ  Tenth Amendment CenterÂ  is publishing articles that are notably slanted toward the the concept of secession. &#8220;Decentralization for Socialists: A Brief Primer,&#8221; reprinted from LewRockwell.com. The essay argued &#8220;a peaceful, just, and democratic solution to a centuries-old problem&#8221; would be to &#8220;[l]et the people of each sovereign state decide their own fate.&#8221; The essayist argued strongly in favor of &#8220;decentralization&#8221; and bemoaned &#8220;the amount of time the modern statists, particularly on the Left, spend labeling the idea of decentralization and secession as &#8216;kooky.&#8217; &#8221; [Tenth Amendment Center website, posted 8/25/09] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce Shonka</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/08/25/decentralization-for-socialists-a-brief-primer/comment-page-1/#comment-281821</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce Shonka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2856#comment-281821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I look to some future mistake by Obama that demonstrates his true alignment- which is NOT on the side of the people.  Once this happens, pandora&#039;s box will be open and many on the left will join the 10th movement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look to some future mistake by Obama that demonstrates his true alignment- which is NOT on the side of the people.  Once this happens, pandora&#8217;s box will be open and many on the left will join the 10th movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monorprise</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/08/25/decentralization-for-socialists-a-brief-primer/comment-page-1/#comment-277428</link>
		<dc:creator>Monorprise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2856#comment-277428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps youâ€™re right Jeff, if so we must be determined to press this option among the republican ranks as the only long term permanent strategy for liberty and conservative values.

Conservatives must be made to understand there is no way to win with too much federal government even if its in the control of their kin.  We can not swash the liberal tendency to dream of their utopia and want to implement it haphazardly. all we can really do is provide them a forum to test it with out hurting us in the process, so that they can see for themselves the consequences of their own collectivist views, given they clearly will not take our word for it nor will they learn from history.


In any case I do not believe we can trust a republican congress and president all that much more then a democratic congress and president, to seriously reduce their own power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps youâ€™re right Jeff, if so we must be determined to press this option among the republican ranks as the only long term permanent strategy for liberty and conservative values.</p>
<p>Conservatives must be made to understand there is no way to win with too much federal government even if its in the control of their kin.  We can not swash the liberal tendency to dream of their utopia and want to implement it haphazardly. all we can really do is provide them a forum to test it with out hurting us in the process, so that they can see for themselves the consequences of their own collectivist views, given they clearly will not take our word for it nor will they learn from history.</p>
<p>In any case I do not believe we can trust a republican congress and president all that much more then a democratic congress and president, to seriously reduce their own power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Matthews</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/08/25/decentralization-for-socialists-a-brief-primer/comment-page-1/#comment-277393</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2856#comment-277393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think a society can trade liberty for economic prosperity.  We can certainly trade liberty for less overall prosperity, but a more equal distribution of what remains.  

I think the liberals don&#039;t align with the cause because politics has long been a game of winners and losers.  They view the cause as a collective rant against their winner - i.e. sour grapes.

Sure enough, when the political tide changes back to Republicans, they will be looking for their rights once again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think a society can trade liberty for economic prosperity.  We can certainly trade liberty for less overall prosperity, but a more equal distribution of what remains.  </p>
<p>I think the liberals don&#8217;t align with the cause because politics has long been a game of winners and losers.  They view the cause as a collective rant against their winner &#8211; i.e. sour grapes.</p>
<p>Sure enough, when the political tide changes back to Republicans, they will be looking for their rights once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monorprise</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/08/25/decentralization-for-socialists-a-brief-primer/comment-page-1/#comment-277346</link>
		<dc:creator>Monorprise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2856#comment-277346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think socialist/communist either are ignorant of the historic example reviling the true nature of their &quot;ideal system&quot; or they don&#039;t care, and simply want the largest level government doing it so that there is and can be no competing political and economic system as to show people just how inherently destructive their socialism/collectivism is to both liberty and economy.

Perhaps they think if they can just achieve a level of government able to put up an iron curtain like the USSR did they could prevent the skilled and otherwise labor from being able to flee to freer lands, and thus force them to submit?

I think this is our issue with socialism/collectivism as a matter of principle (Not Constitutionality) itâ€™s not just the fact that their &quot;ideal system&quot; is a demonstrated economic disaster.  Our issues with Socialism/collectivism is exactly the fact that it inherently crushes our liberty, as it attempts to make us all slaves to a government, that is it&#039;s greatest and most intolerable of evils, inherit in its very nature just as it is inherent to a far more tolerable and limited degree in the very nature of government (Why Government is at best a necessary evil).

For those of us with principles know that to trade liberty for economic property is to trade everything for nothing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think socialist/communist either are ignorant of the historic example reviling the true nature of their &#8220;ideal system&#8221; or they don&#8217;t care, and simply want the largest level government doing it so that there is and can be no competing political and economic system as to show people just how inherently destructive their socialism/collectivism is to both liberty and economy.</p>
<p>Perhaps they think if they can just achieve a level of government able to put up an iron curtain like the USSR did they could prevent the skilled and otherwise labor from being able to flee to freer lands, and thus force them to submit?</p>
<p>I think this is our issue with socialism/collectivism as a matter of principle (Not Constitutionality) itâ€™s not just the fact that their &#8220;ideal system&#8221; is a demonstrated economic disaster.  Our issues with Socialism/collectivism is exactly the fact that it inherently crushes our liberty, as it attempts to make us all slaves to a government, that is it&#8217;s greatest and most intolerable of evils, inherit in its very nature just as it is inherent to a far more tolerable and limited degree in the very nature of government (Why Government is at best a necessary evil).</p>
<p>For those of us with principles know that to trade liberty for economic property is to trade everything for nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce Shonka</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/08/25/decentralization-for-socialists-a-brief-primer/comment-page-1/#comment-277214</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce Shonka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2856#comment-277214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a very pertinent article and discussion.  The Tenth Amendment/sovereignty movement means nothing if the Left remains unified in opposition.

What is needed is to convince the left of just what Brion wrote- that decentralization serves their purposes as well as those on the right and center.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very pertinent article and discussion.  The Tenth Amendment/sovereignty movement means nothing if the Left remains unified in opposition.</p>
<p>What is needed is to convince the left of just what Brion wrote- that decentralization serves their purposes as well as those on the right and center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/08/25/decentralization-for-socialists-a-brief-primer/comment-page-1/#comment-277175</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2856#comment-277175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rawdawg,
you mean like crocodile dundees definition of a knife opposed to the other guys &quot;knife?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rawdawg,<br />
you mean like crocodile dundees definition of a knife opposed to the other guys &#8220;knife?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Boldin</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/08/25/decentralization-for-socialists-a-brief-primer/comment-page-1/#comment-277125</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2856#comment-277125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the reason that people in VT elected a socialist is because there&#039;s a lot of socialists in that state!

The interesting thing, though, is that there&#039;s a really strong presence there of people who believe in decentralized socialism - socialism for their state only..and don&#039;t want to impose it on everyone else.

I don&#039;t prefer or want that option, but that&#039;s how the system works.  They have their version there, other people have their own in other areas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the reason that people in VT elected a socialist is because there&#8217;s a lot of socialists in that state!</p>
<p>The interesting thing, though, is that there&#8217;s a really strong presence there of people who believe in decentralized socialism &#8211; socialism for their state only..and don&#8217;t want to impose it on everyone else.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t prefer or want that option, but that&#8217;s how the system works.  They have their version there, other people have their own in other areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rawdawgbuffalo</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/08/25/decentralization-for-socialists-a-brief-primer/comment-page-1/#comment-277068</link>
		<dc:creator>rawdawgbuffalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2856#comment-277068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thes folks dont know what socialism is and are just &lt;a href=&#039;http://rawdawgb.blogspot.com/2009/08/talking-out-side-of-they-neck.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;talking out the side of they neck&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thes folks dont know what socialism is and are just <a href='http://rawdawgb.blogspot.com/2009/08/talking-out-side-of-they-neck.html' rel="nofollow">talking out the side of they neck</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vin</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/08/25/decentralization-for-socialists-a-brief-primer/comment-page-1/#comment-277009</link>
		<dc:creator>Vin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2856#comment-277009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brion, this is exactly the point. Your description is what America is suppose to be, why we&#039;re different than all other nations, and how the pursuit of happiness is suppose to work. 

Disregard any comments that try to change the focus of your article.  I&#039;d like to see a cogent argument from anyone who disagrees with your central point.  Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brion, this is exactly the point. Your description is what America is suppose to be, why we&#8217;re different than all other nations, and how the pursuit of happiness is suppose to work. </p>
<p>Disregard any comments that try to change the focus of your article.  I&#8217;d like to see a cogent argument from anyone who disagrees with your central point.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
