The Origin of Power is the People

  • Share on Tumblr

Editor’s Note: Elbridge Thomas Gerry (July 17, 1744 – November 23, 1814) was one of the signers of the US Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation. He was one of three men who refused to sign the Constitution because it did not then include a Bill of Rights.

As a Democratic-Republican he was selected as the fifth Vice President of the United States of America, serving under James Madison, from March 4, 1813 until his death.  He was the first Vice President not to run for President of the United States.

The following are excerpts from “Observations On the New Constitution, and On the Federal and State Conventions,” written by Gerry in 1788.

On patriotism and the power of the People
by Elbridge Gerry

When patriotism is discountenanced and publick virtue becomes the ridicule of the sycophant—when every man of liberality, firmness and penetration who cannot lick the hand stretched out to oppress, is deemed an enemy to the State—then is the gulph of despotism set open, and the grades to slavery, though rapid, are scarce perceptible

Self defence is a primary law of nature, which no subsequent law of society can abolish; this primæval principle, the immediate gift of the Creator, obliges every one to remonstrate against the strides of ambition, and a wanton lust of domination, and to resist the first approaches of tyranny, which at this day threaten to sweep away the rights for which the brave sons of America have fought with an heroism scarcely paralleled even in ancient republicks.

It may be repeated, they have purchased it with their blood, and have gloried in their independence with a dignity of spirit, which has made them the admiration of philosophy, the pride of America, and the wonder of Europe.

On these shores freedom has planted her standard, diped in the purple tide that flowed from the veins of her martyred heroes; and here every uncorrupted American yet hopes to see it supported by the vigour, the justice, the wisdom and unanimity of the people, in spite of the deep-laid plots, the secret intrigues, or the bold effrontery of those interested and avaricious adventurers for place, who intoxicated with the ideas of distinction and preferment have prostrated every worthy principle beneath the shrine of ambition.

Yet these are the men who tell us republicanism is dwindled into theory—that we are incapable of enjoying our liberties—and that we must have a master.

All writers on government agree, and the feelings of the human mind witness the truth of these political axioms, that man is born free and possessed of certain unalienable rights—that government is instituted for the protection, safety and happiness of the people, and not for the profit, honour, or private interest of any man, family, or class of men

That the origin of all power is in the people, and that they have an incontestible right to check the creatures of their own creation, vested with certain powers to guard the life, liberty and property of the community.

And if certain selected bodies of men, deputed on these principles, determine contrary to the wishes and expectations of their constituents, the people have an undoubted right to reject their decisions, to call for a revision of their conduct, to depute others in their room, or if they think proper, to demand further time for deliberation on matters of the greatest moment: it therefore is an unwarrantable stretch of authority or influence, if any methods are taken to preclude this peaceful and reasonable mode of enquiry and decision.

And it is with inexpressible anxiety, that many of the best friends of the Union of the States—to the peaceable and equal participation of the rights of nature, and to the glory and dignity of this country, behold the insiduous arts, and the strenuous efforts of the partisans of arbitrary power, by their vague definitions of the best established truths, endeavoring to envelope the mind in darkness the concomitant of slavery, and to lock the strong chains of domestic despotism on a country, which by the most glorious and successful struggles is but newly emancipated from the spectre of foreign dominion.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?

, ,

8 comments
Ruth Ann Wilson
Ruth Ann Wilson

"The origin of Power is the People", yes, I believe that is the intent of the Founders.
"The true design of civil government is to protect men in the enjoyment of Liberty." Samuel West, A.M. Mass. Election Day Sermons, 1776

What is this "monster creature" called "The office of the President." From my observations, the growth of this "creature", has produced a "Kingship" within the United States. Our forefathers were vehemently opposed to a King and "Divine of Rights of those kings".

I have noticed that both political parties, be they conservative or liberal, favor "to grow" this office. What are all these "unelected bureaus" with multitudes that "eat out our substance daily". Most "mischief" perpetrated on the American people come from one or a collection of these "agencies". The way this "Office" has "developed", the vast powers which it possesses, has destroyed much in this Beloved America and the Liberty of the people is it's prime destruction.

I have made the suggestion to the Senators' offices to stop writing the "paycheck" to these hoards that destroy our Liberty. I believe it is the Senate Finance Committee that writes the disbursement for the "Office of the President." I think if this "Office of the President" was "reined in" and the President was to retain, maybe, a small cabinet and a Secretary,(as George Washington had and he established the Country!!!) the President would not be retaining such "Imperial Powers" that were never envisioned by the Founders nor the Constitution.

Congress can do something about this. They hold the "purse strings".

For God & Country

Ruth Ann Wilson
Ruth Ann Wilson

Fred
Fred

Interestingly enough, the exchange between Pilate and Christ during the Passion speaks of power coming from someplace other than the people:

"10 Pilate therefore said to him, "You will not speak to me? Do you not know that I have power to release you, and power to crucify you?" 11 Jesus answered him, "You would have no power over me unless it had been given you from above; therefore he who delivered me to you has the greater sin.""
John 19:10-11

This is extremely relevant because the Founding Fathers were Christians, and attempted to build a state that was Christian, or at least in continuity with Christianity. To dispense with the principle that Christ, the Principal authority over all mankind, enumerated in this passage was a deadly and erroneous dispensation.

(1) Power comes from above, i.e., from God. Even more specifically, from Christ Who is King. All temporal powers are subordinate to Him.

(2) Moreover, it is not just power, but law, that comes from God. We may choose our representatives and those who hold authority, but they have a responsibility TO GOD, from Whom they have received power, to govern by His law.

There is a consistent and thorough disconnect between Christian Faith and the social thought derived from Protestant Thought/Philosophy. The repulsion of Luther, Calvin and the other reformers concerning corruption in the Church was admirable. The first Protestants failed, however, to make the distinction between (1) the Church that was the Foundation and the Gift of God, and (2) the church that was fallible man. (There is a difference.) Corruption became the excuse to dispense with the God-given Sacraments, clerical authority (especially papal), and the authoritatively-approved Tradition in the name of stamping out corruption. Because of this, the Protestant Schism did more than separate Western Christians, it separated the paths of thought Western Christians would take theologically, philosophically and socially. Not for the sake of corrupt churchmen should the reformers have remained fully Catholic, but for the sake of their own wholeness and integrity.

So now, it is up to us to put things right. The reason that conservatives have not triumphed decisively over liberal thought, despite the fact that conservatives – on the whole – are more religiously orthodox, is that BOTH liberal and conservative thought are materialistic and severed from the life-giving Gospel. What the "liberals" (Atheistic Materialists) make forbidden, as in the Soviet Union, the "conservatives (Protestant Classical Liberals) make optional, as in the United States. In both cases, what SHOULD BE fails to gain acceptance. Whether this is so because what ought to be is outlawed, or simply made optional in the name of freedom, makes no difference in the end.

We're only going to be whole again when we stop confusing the works of God with the works of men, acknowledge what God has given us in His Church and return to that Church, i.e., the Roman Catholic Church. We will never be whole again until we are wholly Catholic again. I say this from personal experience.

Fred
Fred

Interestingly enough, the exchange between Pilate and Christ during the Passion speaks of power coming from someplace other than the people:

"10 Pilate therefore said to him, "You will not speak to me? Do you not know that I have power to release you, and power to crucify you?" 11 Jesus answered him, "You would have no power over me unless it had been given you from above; therefore he who delivered me to you has the greater sin.""
John 19:10-11

This is extremely relevant because the Founding Fathers were Christians, and attempted to build a state that was Christian, or at least in continuity with Christianity. To dispense with the principle that Christ, the Principal authority over all mankind, enumerated in this passage was a deadly and erroneous dispensation.

(1) Power comes from above, i.e., from God. Even more specifically, from Christ Who is King. All temporal powers are subordinate to Him.

(2) Moreover, it is not just power, but law, that comes from God. We may choose our representatives and those who hold authority, but they have a responsibility TO GOD, from Whom they have received power, to govern by His law.

There is a consistent and thorough disconnect between Christian Faith and the social thought derived from Protestant Thought/Philosophy. The repulsion of Luther, Calvin and the other reformers concerning corruption in the Church was admirable. The first Protestants failed, however, to make the distinction between (1) the Church that was the Foundation and the Gift of God, and (2) the church that was fallible man. (There is a difference.) Corruption became the excuse to dispense with the God-given Sacraments, clerical authority (especially papal), and the authoritatively-approved Tradition in the name of stamping out corruption. Because of this, the Protestant Schism did more than separate Western Christians, it separated the paths of thought Western Christians would take theologically, philosophically and socially. Not for the sake of corrupt churchmen should the reformers have remained fully Catholic, but for the sake of their own wholeness and integrity.

So now, it is up to us to put things right. The reason that conservatives have not triumphed decisively over liberal thought, despite the fact that conservatives – on the whole – are more religiously orthodox, is that BOTH liberal and conservative thought are materialistic and severed from the life-giving Gospel. What the "liberals" (Atheistic Materialists) make forbidden, as in the Soviet Union, the "conservatives (Protestant Classical Liberals) make optional, as in the United States. In both cases, what SHOULD BE fails to gain acceptance. Whether this is so because what ought to be is outlawed, or simply made optional in the name of freedom, makes no difference in the end.

We're only going to be whole again when we stop confusing the works of God with the works of men, acknowledge what God has given us in His Church and return to that Church, i.e., the Roman Catholic Church. We will never be whole again until we are wholly Catholic again. I say this from personal experience.

larry
larry

Amen to that Michael...I always thought that fighting to stay alive was an instinct.

larry
larry

"Self defence is a primary law of nature, which no subsequent law of society can abolish; this primæval principle, the immediate gift of the Creator, obliges every one to remonstrate against the strides of ambition, and a wanton lust of domination, and to resist the first approaches of tyranny,...."

I'm thinking we are waay beyond those "first approaches of tyranny" And because we have waited so long to wake up, it may be to late to take back our Country

Michael Boldin
Michael Boldin

larry, no doubt tyranny has got a strong foothold. i certainly don't think it's too late, though. what I know for sure is this - if we do nothing, we can guarantee it's too late.

larry
larry

"Self defence is a primary law of nature, which no subsequent law of society can abolish; this primæval principle, the immediate gift of the Creator, obliges every one to remonstrate against the strides of ambition, and a wanton lust of domination, and to resist the first approaches of tyranny,...."

I'm thinking we are waay beyond those "first approaches of tyranny" And because we have waited so long to wake up, it may be to late to take back our Country

David Beardsley
David Beardsley

"...government is instituted for the protection, safety and happiness of the people, and not for the profit, honour, or private interest of any man, family, or class of men..."

So, our founding fathers were against the redistribution of wealth? I guess they were not as "progressive" as Obama.