<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New King George</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/29/the-new-king-george/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/29/the-new-king-george/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Natelson: A Constitutional Coup d&#8217;etat&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/29/the-new-king-george/comment-page-3/#comment-323299</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Natelson: A Constitutional Coup d&#8217;etat&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2283#comment-323299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The New King George [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The New King George [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/29/the-new-king-george/comment-page-1/#comment-302116</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2283#comment-302116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, I think the ER, etc, is mandated by the FED if the institution accepts any federal funding, ie, treats Medicare patients, same with schools, I believe, if they except federal funds for anything, they have to give free lunch. 
 
I am old enough to remember when people actually died on hospital doorsteps because they did not have insurance.  Sad, but true. I believe in supplements, not free gratis. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think the ER, etc, is mandated by the FED if the institution accepts any federal funding, ie, treats Medicare patients, same with schools, I believe, if they except federal funds for anything, they have to give free lunch. </p>
<p>I am old enough to remember when people actually died on hospital doorsteps because they did not have insurance.  Sad, but true. I believe in supplements, not free gratis. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Adams, Guest</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/29/the-new-king-george/comment-page-1/#comment-301485</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Adams, Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2283#comment-301485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JD - There is a significant difference between the word &quot;promote&quot; and the word &quot;provide&quot;.  Granted, the word &quot;promote&quot; the general welfare appears as one of the reasons for the establishment of the Constitution, but to promote the general welfare primarily refers to, by use of the word, encouraging the people, or the States, to consider all things that are in the best interests of the people in general.  It does not mean to provide those things in every and all circumstances, simply because it is believed to be a nice thing to do.  
 
 Read &quot;Not Yours to Give&quot; by Davy Crockett.  You&#039;ll find it on Patriot Post.  The Federal Government is strictly limited to those powers specifically enumerated in the body of the Constitution.  Representatives of said government may encourage State governments to undertake measures to, e.g. provide free health care to the citizens of the states, but nobody can force such measures to take place.  Those tax dollars collected to support the governments, whether State or Federal, County or City, are there for the express purpose of supporting the governments, not the individual citizens.   
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JD &#8211; There is a significant difference between the word &quot;promote&quot; and the word &quot;provide&quot;.  Granted, the word &quot;promote&quot; the general welfare appears as one of the reasons for the establishment of the Constitution, but to promote the general welfare primarily refers to, by use of the word, encouraging the people, or the States, to consider all things that are in the best interests of the people in general.  It does not mean to provide those things in every and all circumstances, simply because it is believed to be a nice thing to do.  </p>
<p> Read &quot;Not Yours to Give&quot; by Davy Crockett.  You&#039;ll find it on Patriot Post.  The Federal Government is strictly limited to those powers specifically enumerated in the body of the Constitution.  Representatives of said government may encourage State governments to undertake measures to, e.g. provide free health care to the citizens of the states, but nobody can force such measures to take place.  Those tax dollars collected to support the governments, whether State or Federal, County or City, are there for the express purpose of supporting the governments, not the individual citizens.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Morrison</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/29/the-new-king-george/comment-page-1/#comment-298487</link>
		<dc:creator>D Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2283#comment-298487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The actual U.S constitution would work just fine. The problem is not it, the problem is those  (the government) who abuse and don&#039;t follow it. The Declaration of Independence is a perfect model for a new one, with some tweaks and substitution of current villains for the old ones it would get right to the heart of the matter, just like the first one did. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The actual U.S constitution would work just fine. The problem is not it, the problem is those  (the government) who abuse and don&#039;t follow it. The Declaration of Independence is a perfect model for a new one, with some tweaks and substitution of current villains for the old ones it would get right to the heart of the matter, just like the first one did. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tenthamendmentcenter podcasts &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/29/the-new-king-george/comment-page-3/#comment-295961</link>
		<dc:creator>tenthamendmentcenter podcasts &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2283#comment-295961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The New King George 29. Jun, 2009 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The New King George 29. Jun, 2009 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheOldGuard</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/29/the-new-king-george/comment-page-3/#comment-265345</link>
		<dc:creator>TheOldGuard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 11:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2283#comment-265345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here I am, a day late and a dollar short, but I feel the need to comment.  Rob Natelson stated this at the end of his article,

&quot;Whatever the motivations of those who seek to use the federal government against the rest of us, they too have launched an unbridled and unprincipled political war against their fellow citizens.  From the perspective of history, in other words:  They are the new King George.&quot;

This gets to the heart of the matter, what has been and is being used against us is &quot;democracy,&quot; or mob rule.  Once our Republic was wrestled away via Federal encroachment (or given away by &quot;the people&quot;) we became a democracy; this is our downfall and it only leads to worse forms of government.

Therefore, it is up to those of us who are &quot;awake and informed&quot; to wake up and inform others!  It is an uphill battle, but you know the outcome, otherwise.

Oh yeah, an excellent article!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here I am, a day late and a dollar short, but I feel the need to comment.  Rob Natelson stated this at the end of his article,</p>
<p>&#8220;Whatever the motivations of those who seek to use the federal government against the rest of us, they too have launched an unbridled and unprincipled political war against their fellow citizens.  From the perspective of history, in other words:  They are the new King George.&#8221;</p>
<p>This gets to the heart of the matter, what has been and is being used against us is &#8220;democracy,&#8221; or mob rule.  Once our Republic was wrestled away via Federal encroachment (or given away by &#8220;the people&#8221;) we became a democracy; this is our downfall and it only leads to worse forms of government.</p>
<p>Therefore, it is up to those of us who are &#8220;awake and informed&#8221; to wake up and inform others!  It is an uphill battle, but you know the outcome, otherwise.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, an excellent article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Morris</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/29/the-new-king-george/comment-page-3/#comment-262497</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 15:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2283#comment-262497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Larry, 

Yes, Corey is a lost cause.  Anyone that wants the very people &quot;offed&quot; that would be the primary suppliers of his self-centered demands, and without which the entire scheme would collapse at inception (Corey, why do you think social security is mandatory for all?  Take your time.) is worse than a half-wit.  But I wonder what the government is going to do when it tries to collect this unlawful, unconstitutional tax from me and I refuse to pay it?  Will it put me in prison?  It doesn&#039;t seem like a very smart thing to do since I still have a business that produces jobs and income, and a family yet to raise.  But who ever accused &#039;govt. men&#039; of being very smart?  Anyway, I guess we&#039;ll all find out soon enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, </p>
<p>Yes, Corey is a lost cause.  Anyone that wants the very people &#8220;offed&#8221; that would be the primary suppliers of his self-centered demands, and without which the entire scheme would collapse at inception (Corey, why do you think social security is mandatory for all?  Take your time.) is worse than a half-wit.  But I wonder what the government is going to do when it tries to collect this unlawful, unconstitutional tax from me and I refuse to pay it?  Will it put me in prison?  It doesn&#8217;t seem like a very smart thing to do since I still have a business that produces jobs and income, and a family yet to raise.  But who ever accused &#8216;govt. men&#8217; of being very smart?  Anyway, I guess we&#8217;ll all find out soon enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HighlanderJuan</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/29/the-new-king-george/comment-page-3/#comment-262177</link>
		<dc:creator>HighlanderJuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2283#comment-262177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PH,

Well said.  As much as unconstitutional law is not law, so a usurper to the office of president really isn&#039;t president, now, is he.

You should join the Oath Keepers.  We need good people like you.

Juan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PH,</p>
<p>Well said.  As much as unconstitutional law is not law, so a usurper to the office of president really isn&#8217;t president, now, is he.</p>
<p>You should join the Oath Keepers.  We need good people like you.</p>
<p>Juan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publius Huldah</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/29/the-new-king-george/comment-page-3/#comment-262167</link>
		<dc:creator>Publius Huldah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2283#comment-262167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes! I read Atlas Shrugged almost 50 years ago, and then re-read it last month. Ayn Rand has had a profound influence on me.  I converted to Christianity from secular humanism just 15 years ago. [Maybe there is hope for Corey?!] When I re-read Atlas Shrugged, I was struck by the following:  although she gives lip service to atheism, her world view  - her conception of an Objective Reality and her view that Morality is built into the very Fabric of Reality, is the same as the Biblical Model.  So I suspect she was a Theist and didn&#039;t know it!    

As Alexander Hamilton said, an unconstitutional law is not a &quot;Law&quot; - it is a mere usurpation, and deserves to be treated as such.

So, like Hamilton, I think the proper course of action for all of us is, just say, &quot;NO, hell NO&quot;!  Why do we, as individuals, local governments, &amp; States, think we have to comply with blatently unconstitutional &quot;laws&quot;?  Hamilton &amp; James Madison made it clear in The Federalist Papers that WE - NOT THE COURTS - are the ultimate enforcers of The Constitution. We do not have the right or the duty to surrender our independent judgments as to the meaning of The Constitution to the courts!

I did take an Oath to defend it from all enemies, domestic &amp; foreign. I keep my Word.PH]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! I read Atlas Shrugged almost 50 years ago, and then re-read it last month. Ayn Rand has had a profound influence on me.  I converted to Christianity from secular humanism just 15 years ago. [Maybe there is hope for Corey?!] When I re-read Atlas Shrugged, I was struck by the following:  although she gives lip service to atheism, her world view  &#8211; her conception of an Objective Reality and her view that Morality is built into the very Fabric of Reality, is the same as the Biblical Model.  So I suspect she was a Theist and didn&#8217;t know it!    </p>
<p>As Alexander Hamilton said, an unconstitutional law is not a &#8220;Law&#8221; &#8211; it is a mere usurpation, and deserves to be treated as such.</p>
<p>So, like Hamilton, I think the proper course of action for all of us is, just say, &#8220;NO, hell NO&#8221;!  Why do we, as individuals, local governments, &amp; States, think we have to comply with blatently unconstitutional &#8220;laws&#8221;?  Hamilton &amp; James Madison made it clear in The Federalist Papers that WE &#8211; NOT THE COURTS &#8211; are the ultimate enforcers of The Constitution. We do not have the right or the duty to surrender our independent judgments as to the meaning of The Constitution to the courts!</p>
<p>I did take an Oath to defend it from all enemies, domestic &amp; foreign. I keep my Word.PH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/29/the-new-king-george/comment-page-3/#comment-262154</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2283#comment-262154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corey you wrote:

MY REPSONSE:
Federal Health care DOES NOT dictate anything, the only thing that is done is the docs get paid. As for loss of choice, have you never been denied care in the USA by a docs boss, (HMO etc) says he/she cant/wonâ€™t pay for test/procedure?



Corey,
In the health care bill there is a provision to FINE citizens for refusing to purchase health care. The fine will be $1000.00 I just read it on the AP yesterday. your healthcare tax will be collected by the IRS much the same way your income tax is collected. they want to make it law, much like car insurance.

I will ignore you facetious replies to my previous post as you already have your mind made up and thus any more explaining or continuing to debate the issue is just wasting my time and yours.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey you wrote:</p>
<p>MY REPSONSE:<br />
Federal Health care DOES NOT dictate anything, the only thing that is done is the docs get paid. As for loss of choice, have you never been denied care in the USA by a docs boss, (HMO etc) says he/she cant/wonâ€™t pay for test/procedure?</p>
<p>Corey,<br />
In the health care bill there is a provision to FINE citizens for refusing to purchase health care. The fine will be $1000.00 I just read it on the AP yesterday. your healthcare tax will be collected by the IRS much the same way your income tax is collected. they want to make it law, much like car insurance.</p>
<p>I will ignore you facetious replies to my previous post as you already have your mind made up and thus any more explaining or continuing to debate the issue is just wasting my time and yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
