10th Amendment Resolution Introduced in Mass.

On Tuesday, 05-26-09, Massachusetts State Representative Jeffrey Davis Perry (R-Sandwich) filed a Resolution before the House of Representatives to protect the Founding Fathers’ intent and the Constitutional protections of the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

“The purpose of this Resolution is to clearly affirm to Congress and the President our  State’s sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution and to demand that the federal government halt the practice of assuming powers and imposing mandates upon the states for purposes which are not enumerated by the Constitution of the United States of America” said Representative Perry from the State House.

As cited by the Tenth Amendment Center, “James Madison, during the Constitutional ratification process, drafted the “Virginia Plan” to give Congress general legislative authority and to empower the national judiciary to hear any case that might cause friction among the states, to give the congress a veto over state laws, to empower the national government to use the military against the states, and to eliminate the states’ accustomed role in selecting members of Congress.  Each one of these proposals was soundly defeated.  In fact, Madison made many more attempts to authorize a national veto over state laws, and these were repeatedly defeated as well…

The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that which has been delegated by the people to the federal government, and also that which is absolutely necessary to advancing those powers specifically enumerated in the Constitution of the United States.  The rest is to be handled by the state governments, or locally, by the people themselves.

The Constitution does not include a congressional power to override state laws.  It does not give the judicial branch unlimited jurisdiction over all matters.  It does not provide Congress with the power to legislate over everything. This is verified by the simple fact that attempts to make these principles part of the Constitution were soundly rejected by its signers.”

The language of the Resolution is as follows:

AFFRIMING THE CONSTITUIONAL PROTECTIONS OF THE 10TH AMENDMENT

WHEREAS,  The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States specifically provides that, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”; and

WHEREAS,  The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being those powers specifically granted to it by the Constitution of the United States and the principle of Federalism is the constitutional division of powers between the national and state governments and is widely regarded as one of America’s most valuable contributions to political science; and

WHEREAS,  The scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be limited in its powers relative to those of the various states; and

WHEREAS,  Many federal mandates are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and infringe upon Massachusetts’ reserve powers and the people’s reserved powers; and

WHEREAS,  A number of proposals from previous administrations and some now being considered by the present administration and from Congress do infringe on the States’ reserve powers and the people’s reserved powers, and may further violate the Constitution of the United States; Therefore be it

RESOLVED, That the Commonwealth of Massachusetts hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States and this Resolution shall serve as a Notice and Demand to the federal government to maintain the balance of powers where the Constitution of the United States; and it be further

RESOLVED,  That the Clerk of the House shall immediately transmit copies of this Resolution to the Honorable Barack Obama, President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives of each state’s legislature of the United States of America, and each member of Congress from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

“The Tenth Amendment was adopted after the Constitutional ratification process.  A primary purpose was to enshrine the fact that the individual states are unique and retain their own sovereignty.  The Constitution does not delegate to the federal government an endless supply of power.  We must always remember that the purpose of the Bill of Rights is to protect freedoms of individuals and the states, not expand the power of the federal government” added Representative Perry.

The Resolution was filed with the House of Representatives Clerk and was cosponsored by Representatives Jones (R-North Reading), Vallee (D-Franklin), Humason (R-Westfield), Webster (R-Pembroke), Evangelidis (R-Holden), Poirier (R- North Attleboro), deMacedo (R-Plymouth), Ross (R-Wrentham), Gifford (R-Wareham), Smola (Three Rivers) and Polito (Shrewsbury).

About Michael Boldin

Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA. Follow him on twitter - @michaelboldin, on LinkedIn, and on Facebook.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?

, ,

23 comments
Christine
Christine

I will call/write to Rep. Perry to say Thank You! I will have to look into what happened as well. Atleast someone in this State is looking out for We The People.

Melchior
Melchior

Has it passed yet in MA?

I hope they get NH's up and passed.

Kathy Meehan
Kathy Meehan

Just remember, England and Canada are under socialized medicine and if we are not careful, WE WILL BE, TOO.

Kathy Meehan
Kathy Meehan

All the states that are taking back their rights as states, good for you all. It is time that "WE THE PEOPLE" started living our Constitution.

God will bless America when we bless God.

Have a great week all 50 states.

jcsjcm
jcsjcm

I do wish the state to push back government interference in our lives. They seem to be in a take over mode which as history has shown in the past can be devastating to its citizens. They can't even handle the government run programs they are involved with right now. I will not allow my choice for health insurance taken away from me. I enjoy the freedom of having the option of changing insurance coverage if I so choose. I will no longer have this choice since the only **CHOICE/OPTION** will be the government. I really can't believe they are calling this choice or option other than to make you think you will have choices. Do not take my freedom from me - I so hope I have the American citizens behind me on this one.

jcsjcm
jcsjcm

Is there any more information about this resolution for Massachusetts? Would this protect us from the Obamadeath bill?

Michael Boldin
Michael Boldin

jcsjcm, this resolution is the first step towards doing a lot of things - it's serving notice and demand to the federal government that it's exercising powers that the people didn't delegate to it.

There's other steps that need to be taken to resist a national health program - and you can see what states like Florida and Arizona are doing in that direction
at this link.

April
April

At least Rep. Davis, a Republican, tried! But, I'm sure it was more of a goodwill gesture. He had to know that those fanatical nutjob liberals would never pass any kind of common sense legislation! I lived in Mass. for 10 years. The nutty lib's rule...

John Shelzi
John Shelzi

After having read all of the posts herein, I am encouraged. One VERY IMPORTANT Correction I want to make:We have Unalienable Rights, NOT inalienable rights!!!! I too will fight if neccassary!!! Some of the small things we can do are: join emailing lists of organizations who send "action alerts", so that it is easy to send messages to our elected officials!!!, I do. God bless all of you, & God belss America!!!

Michael Boldin
Michael Boldin

John - you're right, the declaration referred to un, not in alienable. Although, from my reading, in is used in the same way these days.

Some great recommendations on how to get involved. You also might want to consider setting up your own local group to support these 10th amendment efforts. Click Here for some further information...

STEVE G. IN MISSOURI
STEVE G. IN MISSOURI

I AM NOTICING MORE AND MORE PEOPLE GETTING INVOLVED WITH THIS VERY URGENT MOVEMENT TO STOP OBAMA AND HIS GANG OF LEFTIST THUGS FROM SOCIALIZING THIS WONDERFUL, UNIQUE, GREAT NATION. I WILL FIGHT AND DIE FOR THE CAUSE OF MY STATE'S SOVEREIGNTY. I AM NOT JOKING. I WILL BE, HOWEVER, VOTING. IN THE MEAN TIME, I INTEND PREPARE FOR A POSSIBLE CIVIL WAR. IT IS THE VERY LAST THING I WANT TO SEE HAPPEN, BUT OBAMA IS TRULY, GENUINELY PROVOKING ME INTO THESE ACTIONS. WE ARE NOT STUPID, WE CONSERVATIVES ARE HUGE IN NUMBER AND WILL ULTIMATELY PREVAIL AS LONG AS WE ACT NOW, NOT NEXT MONTH ETC. DO SOMETHING SMALL! CONTACT SOMEONE! ASK THEM IF THEY LIKE WHAT'S GOING ON. GET INFORMED. LET'S NOT QUIT! LET'S WIN!! OUR CHILDREN'S LIVES ARE TRULY AT STAKE.

Gerry Nye
Gerry Nye

The Resolution was introduced by Representative Jeffrey Davis Perry. 'Davis' is his middle name. Massachusetts is fortunate to have someone in the House that has read and understands the Constitution.

Terry Morris
Terry Morris

Jeff wrote:

"I was wondering if Mass.’s session is about over. This sounds late in the game."

Ha! Thanks for the good belly laugh. I needed that this morning.

I've kinda been wondering when Mass. would be drummed out of the union for violating the Constitutional provision guarantying a Republican form of government to each state admitted to the union. But, you know, 'living, breathing' constitution that it has become, the term Republican can mean just about anything anymore.

Terry Morris
Terry Morris

Jeff wrote:

"I was wondering if Mass.’s session is about over. This sounds late in the game."

Ha! Thanks for the good belly laugh. I needed that this morning.

I've kinda been wondering when Mass. would be drummed out of the union for violating the Constitutional provision guarantying a Republican form of government to each state admitted to the union. But, you know, 'living, breathing' constitution that it has become, the term Republican can mean just about anything anymore.

James Brown
James Brown

Hip-hip...hooray!! Back to basics Barack/Bush/et al. This is not a partisan issue...this is a soveriegnty issue...in OHIO if we want to hunt, we'll hunt...if we want to cut our State Welfare Aid...we shouldn't have to be mandated by anyone in Washington...
...the best way to clean up your own neighborhood is empower people to do it themselves...and run the riff-raff right back to wherever they came from.

Eric H
Eric H

If I remember correctly, corporations acting as civic government DO NOT have rights, governments have powers GRANTED by THE PEOPLE.
Powers granted can be revolked.
Inalienable (that which cannot be given away) Rights (that which cannot be taken away) are endowed (gift from the creator) to the people (those who are not members of the ruling class).

Harry C. Bantham
Harry C. Bantham

Three cheers for every state which has demanded (so far) the right to maintain its sovereignty. This is the best news I've heard since Algore invented scrambled eggs. HCB

Trouble
Trouble

I'm somewhere between shock and amazement that someone in Mass had the guts to do it. With co-sponsors to boot!

Is it possible that reality is finally starting to be seen in the northeast States??

As for California, I think you guys did a great job with the message last week. Now your State Legislature may just have to get a reality check. Maybe they should read some of Dave Ramsey's books?

Jeff Matthews - Houston, TX
Jeff Matthews - Houston, TX

Mike: "Ok, I live in California - and if there’s a courageous, honorable representative like Mr Davis in Mass, there’s got to be at least one good one here in CA…..right?"

If not, you need to run! :-)

Jeff Matthews - Houston, TX
Jeff Matthews - Houston, TX

Mike: "Ok, I live in California - and if there’s a courageous, honorable representative like Mr Davis in Mass, there’s got to be at least one good one here in CA…..right?"

If not, you need to run! :-)

Michael Boldin
Michael Boldin

Ok, I live in California - and if there's a courageous, honorable representative like Mr Davis in Mass, there's got to be at least one good one here in CA.....right?

Trackbacks

  1. [...] states rights, Tenth Amendment, Texas A Tenth Amendment resolution was introduced in the Massachusetts State House on [...]

  2. [...] the TenthAmendmentCenter.com: On Tuesday, 05-26-09, Massachusetts State Representative Jeffrey Davis Perry (R-Sandwich) filed a [...]