Alaska House Passes HJR27 for State Sovereignty

  • Share on Tumblr

On April 6, 2009, the Alaska House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed House Joint Resolution 27 (HJR27) which “claims sovereignty for the state under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States”

The final vote was 37-0, with 3 not voting. Here’s the tally. (h/t Tom Mortensen)

Read the full text of the resolution below:

WHEREAS the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads,
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the
States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”; and

WHEREAS the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being
that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and

WHEREAS the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the
federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and

WHEREAS some federal actions weaken states’ rights protected by the Tenth
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS the Tenth Amendment assures that we, the people of the United States of
America and each sovereign state in the Union of States, now have, and have always had,
rights the federal government may not usurp; and

WHEREAS art. IV, sec. 4, Constitution of the United States, reads, “The United
States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,” and
the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads, “The enumeration in the
Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by
the people”; and

WHEREAS the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States,
112 S.Ct. 2408 (1992), that the United States Congress may not simply commandeer the
legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and

WHEREAS all states, including Alaska, find themselves regularly facing proposals
from the United States Congress that weaken states’ rights protected by the Tenth
Amendment;

BE IT RESOLVED that the Alaska State Legislature hereby claims sovereignty for
the state under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers
not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the
United States; and be it

FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution serves as Notice and Demand to the
federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are
beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers; and be it

FURTHER RESOLVED that all compulsory federal legislation that directs states to
comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties or sanctions or requires states to pass
legislation or lose federal funding be prohibited or repealed.

COPIES of this resolution shall be sent to the Honorable Barack Obama, President of
the United States; the Honorable Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Vice-President of the United States and
President of the U.S. Senate; the Honorable Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the U.S. House of
Representatives; the Honorable Lisa Murkowski and the Honorable Mark Begich, U.S.
Senators, and the Honorable Don Young, U.S. Representative, members of the Alaska
delegation in Congress; and all other members of the 111th United States Congress.

About Michael Boldin

Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA. Follow him on twitter - @michaelboldin, on LinkedIn, and on Facebook.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?

, , , ,

7 comments
Constitutionalist
Constitutionalist

This stuff is a bunch of bung. Lawyers/Politicians fooling the sheep into believing that they are actually _doing_ something beneficial for them when, in fact, they are not. It is posturing for relection. Don't be emotionally sucked into this. If you want a better chance at happiness and freedom - excercise your greatest right: leave. I pledge allegience to the Constitution of the United States of America and to it's Bill of Rights...One nation, divisible, with liberty, proper punishment, and fair justice for ALL.

Andrew S.
Andrew S.

That's awesome! I was in NH the day after the vote failed there, but it was close. It will go through next year without a doubt.

Trouble
Trouble

I would expect that the two that failed will come back up TMAQ. Give them time.

Michael Boldin
Michael Boldin

no doubt that this is going to take some patience. Although things might seem to be progressing quickly, expecting too much too soon can only have negative effects. As Murray Rothbard wrote some time ago:

...short-run optimism, being unrealistic, leads straightway to disillusion and then to long-run pessimism; just as, on the other side of the coin, long-run pessimism leads to exclusive and self-defeating concentration on immediate and short-run issues....

TMAQ
TMAQ

Thats 32 resolutions introduced, 2 failed and 6 passed. YES!

Trouble
Trouble

It's a right that's been violated multiple times for several decades. This is a "Cease and Desist" order that the Federal Government must obey or be nullified. Read Georgia's bill, it's much harsher in its wording. You'll have to get through a bit more legalease though.

big bopper
big bopper

Yeah that's just re-inforces a right they have under the constitution. No need to panic.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] TenthAmendmentCenter.com: On April 6, 2009, the Alaska House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed House Joint Resolution [...]

  2. [...] as the State Senate passed it on April 19th with a vote of 19-0 (1 absent).  The resolution previously passed the State House with a vote of 37-0 (3 absent) – and the revised version passed on the 19th with a vote of [...]

  3. [...] as the State Senate passed it on April 19th with a vote of 19-0 (1 absent).  The resolution previously passed the State House with a vote of 37-0 (3 absent) – and the revised version passed on the 19th with a vote of [...]

  4. [...] as the State Senate passed it on April 19th with a vote of 19-0 (1 absent).  The resolution previously passed the State House with a vote of 37-0 (3 absent) – and the revised version passed on the 19th with a vote of [...]

  5. [...] as the State Senate passed it on April 19th with a vote of 19-0 (1 absent).  The resolution previously passed the State House with a vote of 37-0 (3 absent) – and the revised version passed on the 19th with a vote of [...]