<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guns, Gold, Secession</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/05/guns-gold-secession/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/05/guns-gold-secession/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doyle Osier</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/05/guns-gold-secession/comment-page-1/#comment-533572</link>
		<dc:creator>Doyle Osier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1167#comment-533572</guid>
		<description>Another beneficial line. I enjoyed it very much. Let me know about new posts, Doyle Osier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another beneficial line. I enjoyed it very much. Let me know about new posts, Doyle Osier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Immediate Is Any Secession Talk? &#171; Info Ink</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/05/guns-gold-secession/comment-page-1/#comment-286687</link>
		<dc:creator>How Immediate Is Any Secession Talk? &#171; Info Ink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 07:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1167#comment-286687</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Guns, Gold, Secession.&#8221; The post by contributor Karen De Coster praised recent state legislative activity, in which &#8220;[t]wenty-eight states are invoking the law of the land, the U.S. Constitution, by rolling out legislation to assert their sovereignty as free states in order to keep from being undermined by the never-ending swarm of unrestrained federal decrees.&#8221; De Coster argued that &#8220;[g]uns are the tools with which you defend yourself, not only from the local criminal who wants what you have, but even more so, they provide free men with the capability for physical resistance from a federal government whose expansion of powers and oppressive tactics are out of control.&#8221; And, the post concluded, &#8220;The only way to get this oppressive tyrant &#8212; known as the federal government &#8212; off our back is to break away from it and start anew.&#8221; [Tenth Amendment Center website, posted 4/5/09] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Guns, Gold, Secession.&#8221; The post by contributor Karen De Coster praised recent state legislative activity, in which &#8220;[t]wenty-eight states are invoking the law of the land, the U.S. Constitution, by rolling out legislation to assert their sovereignty as free states in order to keep from being undermined by the never-ending swarm of unrestrained federal decrees.&#8221; De Coster argued that &#8220;[g]uns are the tools with which you defend yourself, not only from the local criminal who wants what you have, but even more so, they provide free men with the capability for physical resistance from a federal government whose expansion of powers and oppressive tactics are out of control.&#8221; And, the post concluded, &#8220;The only way to get this oppressive tyrant &#8212; known as the federal government &#8212; off our back is to break away from it and start anew.&#8221; [Tenth Amendment Center website, posted 4/5/09] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tex</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/05/guns-gold-secession/comment-page-1/#comment-257626</link>
		<dc:creator>Tex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1167#comment-257626</guid>
		<description>Look what BO is up to now...............

 



&gt; I went to National Law Review site and it is there!
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; Military To Take Oath To Obama, NOT Our Constitution
&gt; 
&gt; ON THE WAY TO DICTATORSHIP???
&gt; 
&gt; I DIDN&#039;T KNOW ABOUT THIS TILL NOW.....BUT READ IT &amp; TELL ME IF
&gt; THIS DOESN&#039;T MAKE YOUR BLOOD BOIL!!!
&gt; 
&gt; THE NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL
&gt; Wednesday, January 28, 2009
&gt; Military to Pledge Oath To Obama, Not Constitution
&gt; Michele Chang
&gt; 
&gt; Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is extremely frustrated with
&gt; orders that the White House is contemplating. According to
&gt; sources at the Pentagon, including all branches of the armed
&gt; forces, the Obama Administration may break with a
&gt; centuries-old tradition.
&gt; 
&gt; A spokesman for General James Cartwright, the Vice Chairman of
&gt; the Joint Chiefs of Staff, states that the Obama
&gt; Administration wants to have soldiers and officers pledge a
&gt; loyalty oath directly to the office of the President, and no
&gt; longer to the Constitution.
&gt; 
&gt; &quot;The oath to the Constitution is as old as the document
&gt; itself.&quot; the spokesman said, &quot;At no time in American history,
&gt; not even in the Civil War, did the oath change or the subject
&gt; of the oath differ. It has always been to the Constitution.&quot;
&gt; 
&gt; The back-and-forth between the White House and the Defense
&gt; Department was expected as President George W. Bush left
&gt; office. President Obama has already signed orders to close
&gt; Guantanamo and to pull combat troops from Iraq But, this, say
&gt; many at the Defense Department, goes too far.
&gt; 
&gt; &quot;Technically, we can&#039;t talk about it before it becomes
&gt; official policy.&quot; the spokesman continued. &quot;However, the
&gt; Defense Department, including the Secretary, will not take
&gt; this laying down. Expect a fight from the bureaucracy and the
&gt; brass.&quot;
&gt; 
&gt; Sources at the White House had a different point of view. In a
&gt; circular distributed by White House Press Secretary Robert
&gt; Gibbs, the rationale for the change was made more clear.
&gt; 
&gt; &quot;The President feels that the military has been too
&gt; indoctrinated by the old harbingers of hate: nationalism,
&gt; racism, and classism. By removing an oath to the American
&gt; society, the soldiers are less likely to commit atrocities
&gt; like those at Abu Ghraib.&quot;
&gt; 
&gt; &quot;We expect a lot of flak over this,&quot; the classified memo
&gt; continues. &quot;But those that would be most against it are those
&gt; looking either for attention or control.&quot;
&gt; 
&gt; The time frame for the changes are unknown. However, it is
&gt; more likely that the changes will be made around the July 4th
&gt; holiday, in order to dampen any potential backlash. The
&gt; difference in the oath will actually only be slight. The main
&gt; differences will be the new phrasing. It is expected that the
&gt; oath to the Constitution will be entirely phased out within
&gt; two years.
&gt; 
&gt; CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS WHAT&#039;S NEXT...IS HE GOING TO ASK
&gt; THE ALLEGIANCE OF ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS &amp; SET HIMSELF UP AS GOD TO BE
&gt; WORSHIPPED???
&gt; 
&gt; THIS FRAUD &amp; TRAITOR TO THE UNITED STATES &amp; IT&#039;S CONSTITUTION, NEEDS TO
&gt; BE IMPEACHED!!!!
&gt; 
&gt; IF YOU&#039;RE AS OUTRAGED BY THIS AS I AM...PASS IT ON SO OTHERS
&gt; KNOW WHAT THIS SNEAKY FRAUD IS UP TO BEHIND CLOSED DOORS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look what BO is up to now&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>&gt; I went to National Law Review site and it is there!<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Military To Take Oath To Obama, NOT Our Constitution<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; ON THE WAY TO DICTATORSHIP???<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; I DIDN&#8217;T KNOW ABOUT THIS TILL NOW&#8230;..BUT READ IT &amp; TELL ME IF<br />
&gt; THIS DOESN&#8217;T MAKE YOUR BLOOD BOIL!!!<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; THE NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL<br />
&gt; Wednesday, January 28, 2009<br />
&gt; Military to Pledge Oath To Obama, Not Constitution<br />
&gt; Michele Chang<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is extremely frustrated with<br />
&gt; orders that the White House is contemplating. According to<br />
&gt; sources at the Pentagon, including all branches of the armed<br />
&gt; forces, the Obama Administration may break with a<br />
&gt; centuries-old tradition.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; A spokesman for General James Cartwright, the Vice Chairman of<br />
&gt; the Joint Chiefs of Staff, states that the Obama<br />
&gt; Administration wants to have soldiers and officers pledge a<br />
&gt; loyalty oath directly to the office of the President, and no<br />
&gt; longer to the Constitution.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &#8220;The oath to the Constitution is as old as the document<br />
&gt; itself.&#8221; the spokesman said, &#8220;At no time in American history,<br />
&gt; not even in the Civil War, did the oath change or the subject<br />
&gt; of the oath differ. It has always been to the Constitution.&#8221;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; The back-and-forth between the White House and the Defense<br />
&gt; Department was expected as President George W. Bush left<br />
&gt; office. President Obama has already signed orders to close<br />
&gt; Guantanamo and to pull combat troops from Iraq But, this, say<br />
&gt; many at the Defense Department, goes too far.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &#8220;Technically, we can&#8217;t talk about it before it becomes<br />
&gt; official policy.&#8221; the spokesman continued. &#8220;However, the<br />
&gt; Defense Department, including the Secretary, will not take<br />
&gt; this laying down. Expect a fight from the bureaucracy and the<br />
&gt; brass.&#8221;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Sources at the White House had a different point of view. In a<br />
&gt; circular distributed by White House Press Secretary Robert<br />
&gt; Gibbs, the rationale for the change was made more clear.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &#8220;The President feels that the military has been too<br />
&gt; indoctrinated by the old harbingers of hate: nationalism,<br />
&gt; racism, and classism. By removing an oath to the American<br />
&gt; society, the soldiers are less likely to commit atrocities<br />
&gt; like those at Abu Ghraib.&#8221;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &#8220;We expect a lot of flak over this,&#8221; the classified memo<br />
&gt; continues. &#8220;But those that would be most against it are those<br />
&gt; looking either for attention or control.&#8221;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; The time frame for the changes are unknown. However, it is<br />
&gt; more likely that the changes will be made around the July 4th<br />
&gt; holiday, in order to dampen any potential backlash. The<br />
&gt; difference in the oath will actually only be slight. The main<br />
&gt; differences will be the new phrasing. It is expected that the<br />
&gt; oath to the Constitution will be entirely phased out within<br />
&gt; two years.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS WHAT&#8217;S NEXT&#8230;IS HE GOING TO ASK<br />
&gt; THE ALLEGIANCE OF ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS &amp; SET HIMSELF UP AS GOD TO BE<br />
&gt; WORSHIPPED???<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; THIS FRAUD &amp; TRAITOR TO THE UNITED STATES &amp; IT&#8217;S CONSTITUTION, NEEDS TO<br />
&gt; BE IMPEACHED!!!!<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; IF YOU&#8217;RE AS OUTRAGED BY THIS AS I AM&#8230;PASS IT ON SO OTHERS<br />
&gt; KNOW WHAT THIS SNEAKY FRAUD IS UP TO BEHIND CLOSED DOORS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pages tagged "shy"</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/05/guns-gold-secession/comment-page-1/#comment-254209</link>
		<dc:creator>Pages tagged "shy"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 14:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1167#comment-254209</guid>
		<description>[...] bookmarks tagged shyHave you been ripped off by the Video Professor recently? Guns, Gold, Secession&#160;saved by 5 others  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;hammersmaniac4eva bookmarked on 04/05/09 &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bookmarks tagged shyHave you been ripped off by the Video Professor recently? Guns, Gold, Secession&nbsp;saved by 5 others  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;hammersmaniac4eva bookmarked on 04/05/09 | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

