by Dave Nalle
You may not have heard much about it, but there’s a quiet movement afoot to reassert state sovereignty and stop the uncontrolled expansion of federal government power. Almost half of the state legislatures are considering or have representatives preparing to introduce resolutions which reassert the principles of the 9th and 10th Amendments to the Constitution and the idea that federal power is strictly limited to specific areas detailed in the Constitution and that all other governmental authority rests with the states.
In the version of this bill being considered in Washington state, they appeal to the authority of James Madison in The Federalist who wrote:
“â€The powers delegated to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the state governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, [such] as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce. The powers reserved to the several states will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people.â€
The founding fathers believed in a balance between state and federal power. This state sovereignty movement clearly arises from the belief that the balance of power has tilted too far and for too long in the direction of the federal government and that it’s time to restore that lose balance.
The emergence of this movement is a hopeful sign of the people asserting their rights and the rights of the states and finally crying “enough†to runaway government. With the threat of increasingly out of control federal spending, some of these sovereignty bills may stand a fair chance of passage in the coming year.
There’s a lot of excitement about these bills, but there are also a lot of misconceptions, with people claiming that some states have already declared sovereignty and that the movement is much farther along than it really is. Contrary to popular rumor, none of the states has actually enacted a sovereignty law yet. Some have come close. Oklahoma’s bill passed their lower house overwhelmingly but stalled in the Senate last fall and is being held over for consideration in the new year.
Contrary to the fantasies of some extremists, these sovereignty bills are not the first step towards secession or splitting up the union, nor are they an effort to block collection of the income tax, appealing though that might be. For the most part, they are not so much political statements of independence as they are expressions of fiscal authority directed specifically at the growing cost of unfunded mandates being placed upon the states by the federal government. Despite the movement picking up steam as he came to office, the target of these bills is not President Obama, but rather the Democrat-dominated Congress whose plans for massive bailouts and expanded social programs are likely to come at an enormous cost to the states.
It has become increasingly common for Congress to pass legislation which dictates policy to the states, but which comes without adequate federal funding and the expectation that the cost of these programs, which the states had no real say in approving, will come out of state budgets. This has been a long-term problem with Medicaid and Medicare, but the unfunded mandate which stirred up the most ire recently was the No Child Left Behind program. More concern has been raised with the recent reauthorization and expansion of the SCHIP program which has a history of requiring more expenditure than is provided for in the federal budget.
The text of the bill proposed in Arizona makes the clearest statement of the intent to block unfunded mandates:
“That this Resolution serves as notice and demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers.â€
and
“That all compulsory federal legislation that directs states to comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties or sanctions or requires states to pass legislation or lose federal funding be prohibited or repealed.â€
What this movement is most similar to is the Nullification Crisis of 1832 where the State of South Carolina asserted that it had the right to nullify the authority of federal laws within its borders. In this case the states are not asserting anything as broad as the Doctrine of Nullification, but are merely reasserting the limits which the 10th Amendment places on federal authority, specifically as it applies to spending, the idea being that they don’t have to pay for federal mandates if their legislators choose not to.
Not all of the bills fall within these limitations. Missouri’s bill actually goes somewhat further and does assert the right fo the state to negate federal law, specifically in reference to the proposed federal Freedom of Choice Act, which some fear would bar states from passing laws regulating abortion. New Hampshire’s bill actually goes so far as to lay out a very strongly worded variant of the Doctrine of Nullifcation which specifies acts by the federal government (many of them currently being proposed in Congress) which would effectively negate the Constitution and the authority of the federal government within their state. Hawaii’s proposed sovereignty bill comes very close to being an actual act of secession, based on native tribal rights.
As things stand right now it looks like Oklahoma, Washington, Hawaii, Missouri, Arizona, New Hampshire, Georgia, California, Michigan and Montana will all definitely consider sovereignty bills this year. They may be joined by Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, Alaska, Kansas, Alabama, Nevada, Maine and Pennsylvania where legislators have pledged to introduce similar bills. Twenty states standing up to the federal government and demanding a return to constitutional principles is a great start, but it remains to be seen whether legislatures and governors are brave enough or angry enough to follow through. As the Obama administration and the Democratic Congress push for more expansion of federal power and spending that may help provide the motivation needed for the sovereignty movement to take off.
Dave Nalle has worked as a magazine editor, a freelance writer, a capitol hill staffer, a game designer and taught college history for many years. He now designs fonts for a living and lives with his family in a small town just outside Austin where he is ex-president of the local Lions Club. He is on the board of the Republican Liberty Caucus and Politics Editor of Blogcritics Magazine. You can find his writings about fonts, art and graphic design at The Scriptorium. He also runs a conspiracy debunking site at IdiotWars.com.
[...] states file sovereignty resolutions State Sovereignty Movement Quietly Growing » Tenth Amendment Center [...]
[...] Washington legislators reaffirm states’ rights UPDATE: 8 more states States take the tenth State Sovereignty Movement Quietly Growing Federalism and the 10th Amendment Oklahoma declares Sovereignty! States Rights Movement vs Federal [...]
[...] and Washington legislators reaffirm states’ rights UPDATE: 8 more states States take the tenth State Sovereignty Movement Quietly Growing Federalism and the 10th Amendment Oklahoma declares Sovereignty! States Rights Movement vs Federal [...]
[...] State Sovereignty Movement Quietly Growing [...]
[...] Washington legislators reaffirm states’ rights UPDATE: 8 more states States take the tenth State Sovereignty Movement Quietly Growing Federalism and the 10th Amendment Oklahoma declares Sovereignty! States Rights Movement vs Federal [...]
[...] · No Comments I found an interesting blog article explaining in more detail. Click here to check it [...]
infighting…
So… does anyone want to take bets on how the new 10th-Amendment-reinforcement laws that twenty-odd states are considering will mesh up with the newly-proposed “Assault Weapon” Ban? It might just be me, but the two seem rather… contradictory…….
[...] I am NOT a constitutional scholar, I don’t claim to be, but there is a vein of dissatisfaction ripping through this nation the likes of which we have never seen. Many states, not just Texas, are making an effort to establish their sovereignty for the United States. Twenty states standing up to the federal government and demanding a return to constitutional principles is a great start, but it remains to be seen whether legislatures and governors are brave enough or angry enough to follow through. As the Obama administration and the Democratic Congress push for more expansion of federal power and spending that may help provide the motivation needed for the sovereignty movement to take off. SOURCE: State Sovereignty Movement Quietly Growing [...]
[...] and Washington legislators reaffirm states’ rights UPDATE: 8 more states States take the tenth State Sovereignty Movement Quietly Growing Federalism and the 10th Amendment Oklahoma declares Sovereignty! States Rights Movement vs Federal [...]
[...] Add to this the fact that possibly a whole lot of states are trying to exercise their rights under the 10th amendment. [...]
[...] asking the government to leave our food alone. Better still, it’s worth looking into the state sovereignty movement, and asking the federal government to do what it’s supposed to do (militia, treaties, etc.) , [...]
[...] authority in favor of state or local authority” appears to be aimed at supporters of the State Soverignty movement, which seeks to assert states rights over the federal government as outlined in the 10th Amendment [...]
[...] else, Washington now controls almost everything a state might want to do on its own. There is a growing movement by states to reassert their own sovereignty based on the specifically enumerated powers given to the federal government with all other powers [...]
[...] shot heard round the world has its echoes today in the TEA PARTY movement, state sovereignty and nullification movements, and even the push for federalism amendments. Likewise the long list of [...]
[...] shot heard round the world has its echoes today in the TEA PARTY movement, state sovereignty and nullification movements, and even the push for federalism amendments. Likewise the long list of [...]
[...] idea of state secession is growing among state legislatures, as evidenced by the number of state sovereignty bills submitted. My home state of Mississippi shot down a bill promoting state sovereignty on June 3rd [...]
[...] word "reign". I before E, except when you reign over the rules Re-posting your link : State Sovereignty Movement Quietly Growing*|*Tenth Amendment Center 2009 July "Currently 36 other states have introduced similar measures in their various state [...]
[...] elastic clause and the interstate commerce clause to greatly expand its powers. There has been a movement recently though to reassert state [...]
[...] State Sovereignty Movements: Legislatures in states like New Hampshire pass bills to limit federal power. Built-in escape clauses allow states to secede when they perceive that the feds are infringing on [...]
[...] shot heard round the world has its echoes today in the TEA PARTY movement, state sovereignty and nullification movements, and even the push for federalism amendments. Likewise the long list of [...]
[...] War. The fact is the Civil War was only 10% about slavery. It was 90% about States rights, sovereignty, and the attempt to force the Federal Government to obey THE LAW in OUR CONSTITUTION. The [...]
[...] War. The fact is the Civil War was only 10% about slavery. It was 90% about States rights, sovereignty, and the attempt to force the Federal Government to obey THE LAW in OUR CONSTITUTION. The [...]
[...] “The founding fathers believed in a balance between state and federal power. This state sovereignty movement clearly arises from the belief that the balance of power has tilted too far and for too long in the direction of the federal government and that it’s time to restore that lose balance. The emergence of this movement is a hopeful sign of the people asserting their rights and the rights of the states and finally crying “enough†to runaway government. With the threat of increasingly out of control federal spending, some of these sovereignty bills may stand a fair chance of passage in the coming year”. (Full article at the 10th Amendment Center) [...]
[...] State Sovereignty Movements: Legislatures in states like New Hampshire pass bills to limit federal power. Built-in escape clauses allow states to secede when they perceive that the feds are infringing on [...]
[...] legislators reaffirm states’ rights UPDATE: 8 more states [12] States take the tenth [13] State Sovereignty Movement Quietly Growing [14] Federalism and the 10th Amendment [15] Oklahoma declares Sovereignty! [16] States Rights [...]
[...] and Washington legislators reaffirm states’ rights UPDATE: 8 more states States take the tenth State Sovereignty Movement Quietly Growing Federalism and the 10th Amendment Oklahoma declares Sovereignty! States Rights Movement vs Federal [...]
[...] Oklahoma declares Sovereignty! Albany's Insanity What happened to the 10th Amendment? State Sovereignty Movement Quietly Growing|Tenth Amendment Center State prepares to challenge U.S. gun laws Idaho first to sign law against health care reform [...]
[...] and Washington legislators reaffirm states’ rights UPDATE: 8 more states States take the tenth State Sovereignty Movement Quietly Growing Federalism and the 10th Amendment Oklahoma declares Sovereignty! States Rights Movement vs Federal [...]
[...] Supporters of the 10th amendment are pushing a petition to reassert state sovereignty because the balance of power has tilted too far and for too long power in the direction of the federal government and that it’s time to restore that lost balance. A petition drive is under way to reassert states sovereignty rights and limit federal government encroachment into a state’s affairs. Learn more about the State Sovereignty movement. [...]
[...] 9th and 10th Amendments to the Constitution are the state and local governments’ check and balance against overreaching federal power. For far too long, our local and state governments have neglected and often ignored those [...]
[...] States right – the tenth amendment – quietly growing movement. I expect to see more challenges to the current interpretation of the 10th Amendment. [...]
[...] 5. State Sovereignty Movement Quietly Growing http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/09/state-sovereignty-movement-quietly-growing/ [...]