<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Montana Firearms Freedom Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/04/montana-firearms-freedom-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/04/montana-firearms-freedom-act/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: redthumb</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/04/montana-firearms-freedom-act/comment-page-1/#comment-325658</link>
		<dc:creator>redthumb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=201#comment-325658</guid>
		<description>This link must be read by anyone and everyone who wishes to have this movement succeed: 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.originalintent.org/edu/chapter44.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.originalintent.org/edu/chapter44.php&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This link must be read by anyone and everyone who wishes to have this movement succeed:<br />
  <a href="http://www.originalintent.org/edu/chapter44.php" target="_blank">http://www.originalintent.org/edu/chapter44.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montana firearms freedom act - (MT) - Page 5 - City-Data Forum</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/04/montana-firearms-freedom-act/comment-page-1/#comment-310577</link>
		<dc:creator>Montana firearms freedom act - (MT) - Page 5 - City-Data Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=201#comment-310577</guid>
		<description>[...] Originally Posted by ElkHunter   You lost me. FFA?????      Firearms Freedom Act.  Montana has it and a few other states do as well.  http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/...s-freedom-act/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally Posted by ElkHunter   You lost me. FFA?????      Firearms Freedom Act.  Montana has it and a few other states do as well.  <a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/...s-freedom-act/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/&#8230;s-freedom-act/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shot in the Dark &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I&#8217;ll Take The Tenth</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/04/montana-firearms-freedom-act/comment-page-1/#comment-289762</link>
		<dc:creator>Shot in the Dark &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I&#8217;ll Take The Tenth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=201#comment-289762</guid>
		<description>[...] Tom Emmer&#8217;s bill &#8211; actually borrowed from similar bills that have become law in Montana, Tennesee and South Carolina - is part of a national, grassroots effort to start that same dynamic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tom Emmer&#8217;s bill &#8211; actually borrowed from similar bills that have become law in Montana, Tennesee and South Carolina &#8211; is part of a national, grassroots effort to start that same dynamic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Anderson</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/04/montana-firearms-freedom-act/comment-page-1/#comment-288370</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=201#comment-288370</guid>
		<description>I think it is worth remembering that Jefferson himself wrote in detail asserting that the States are &#039;above&#039; the Federal Government and that, should the Federal Government breach its contract with a state or states, the state(s) are within their Constitutional &#039;rights&#039; to secede.  I think we need to see a State, such as Alaska, or Texas, or Montana, actually vote to secede on the basis of the Contractual breachs made by a now tyrannical Federal Government.  This is not 1861; there is not likely to be a &#039;war&#039; fought over secession.  If even one State does it, that alone could shatter the Federal Government&#039;s over reaching power grabs.  Jefferson&#039;s stated views were really right in line with the Confederacy and what it tried to do.  Now, though, would be a better time, with freedom, not slavery, the issue.  Bob Anderson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is worth remembering that Jefferson himself wrote in detail asserting that the States are &#8216;above&#8217; the Federal Government and that, should the Federal Government breach its contract with a state or states, the state(s) are within their Constitutional &#8216;rights&#8217; to secede.  I think we need to see a State, such as Alaska, or Texas, or Montana, actually vote to secede on the basis of the Contractual breachs made by a now tyrannical Federal Government.  This is not 1861; there is not likely to be a &#8216;war&#8217; fought over secession.  If even one State does it, that alone could shatter the Federal Government&#8217;s over reaching power grabs.  Jefferson&#8217;s stated views were really right in line with the Confederacy and what it tried to do.  Now, though, would be a better time, with freedom, not slavery, the issue.  Bob Anderson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Vittoriani</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/04/montana-firearms-freedom-act/comment-page-1/#comment-286197</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Vittoriani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=201#comment-286197</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s time to abolish the federal government because it serves only as an instrument of oppression. The movement has started already and gaining popularity. Finally we will see the realization of our forefathers dream: a 
people&#039;s government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s time to abolish the federal government because it serves only as an instrument of oppression. The movement has started already and gaining popularity. Finally we will see the realization of our forefathers dream: a<br />
people&#8217;s government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/04/montana-firearms-freedom-act/comment-page-1/#comment-275669</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=201#comment-275669</guid>
		<description>a wonderful bill that will adds job to the state, made in the state , does not leave the state no federal law can be enforced 

The once Great NRA does not support the firearms Freedom act, soon to be ex NRA member and no more extra bucks for the once great NRA

9/09 issue page  18 NRA Excutive Director COX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a wonderful bill that will adds job to the state, made in the state , does not leave the state no federal law can be enforced </p>
<p>The once Great NRA does not support the firearms Freedom act, soon to be ex NRA member and no more extra bucks for the once great NRA</p>
<p>9/09 issue page  18 NRA Excutive Director COX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; I&#8217;ll Take The Tenth</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/04/montana-firearms-freedom-act/comment-page-1/#comment-265405</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; I&#8217;ll Take The Tenth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=201#comment-265405</guid>
		<description>[...] Tom Emmer&#8217;s bill - actually borrowed from similar bills that have become law in Montana, Tennesee and South Carolina - is part of a national, grassroots effort to start that same dynamic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tom Emmer&#8217;s bill &#8211; actually borrowed from similar bills that have become law in Montana, Tennesee and South Carolina &#8211; is part of a national, grassroots effort to start that same dynamic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Anderson</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/04/montana-firearms-freedom-act/comment-page-1/#comment-256048</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 07:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=201#comment-256048</guid>
		<description>It is about time someone reminded the Federal Government about the 9th and 10th Articles of Amendment.  90% of what passes for legislation at the federal level is completely without Constitutional authority.  The warping of the commerce clause in the 1930s to regulate everything/anything is so repugnant that I am amazed that it has taken this long to get action started.  As someone else noted above, the Federal government only has POWERS specifically articulated in the Constitution, and no more; the 9th and 10th Articles of Amendment specifically state that all other rights and powers belong to the individuals and the states.  Indeed, the primary job of the federal government is the PROTECTION of our individual rights; to the extent that said government does the opposite, its laws are unconstitutional and invalid. In fact, statehood itself is a contractual arrangement between the state and the federal government; states are acting lawfully if they secede (Lincoln was in the wrong in the War of Northern Agression - it is misnamed Civil War, but a civil war is one concerning control of government).  There are active secessionist movements in Vermont, Alaska, Texas, and Hawaii, so far as I know.  And, of course, the breaching of the contract by the federal government with Montana would give Montana the legal right to secede.  In fact, the Texas Consitution, as accepted in their statehood agreement, gives them the authority to secede.  Of the first 13 states, New York, Rhode Island, and Virginia also specifically reserved secession for those states as well. Thomas Jefferson stated that we are not only not obligated to obey an illegal law, we are morally obliged to disobey illegal laws.  The simple passage of legislation by Congress does NOT confer legitimacy on a law, even when corrupt courts rule otherwise.  The fact that 15 other states are planning the same legislation is very heartening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is about time someone reminded the Federal Government about the 9th and 10th Articles of Amendment.  90% of what passes for legislation at the federal level is completely without Constitutional authority.  The warping of the commerce clause in the 1930s to regulate everything/anything is so repugnant that I am amazed that it has taken this long to get action started.  As someone else noted above, the Federal government only has POWERS specifically articulated in the Constitution, and no more; the 9th and 10th Articles of Amendment specifically state that all other rights and powers belong to the individuals and the states.  Indeed, the primary job of the federal government is the PROTECTION of our individual rights; to the extent that said government does the opposite, its laws are unconstitutional and invalid. In fact, statehood itself is a contractual arrangement between the state and the federal government; states are acting lawfully if they secede (Lincoln was in the wrong in the War of Northern Agression &#8211; it is misnamed Civil War, but a civil war is one concerning control of government).  There are active secessionist movements in Vermont, Alaska, Texas, and Hawaii, so far as I know.  And, of course, the breaching of the contract by the federal government with Montana would give Montana the legal right to secede.  In fact, the Texas Consitution, as accepted in their statehood agreement, gives them the authority to secede.  Of the first 13 states, New York, Rhode Island, and Virginia also specifically reserved secession for those states as well. Thomas Jefferson stated that we are not only not obligated to obey an illegal law, we are morally obliged to disobey illegal laws.  The simple passage of legislation by Congress does NOT confer legitimacy on a law, even when corrupt courts rule otherwise.  The fact that 15 other states are planning the same legislation is very heartening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Patrick Henry Cacucus: reawaken states&#8217; powers under 9th and 10th Amendments &#124; Red Pills</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/04/montana-firearms-freedom-act/comment-page-1/#comment-255602</link>
		<dc:creator>The Patrick Henry Cacucus: reawaken states&#8217; powers under 9th and 10th Amendments &#124; Red Pills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=201#comment-255602</guid>
		<description>[...] now many are reading with interest the move in Montana as they passed into law their &#8216;Firearms Freedom Act&#8216; while many other states are following suit. The &#8216;Tenth Amendment Center&#8216; has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now many are reading with interest the move in Montana as they passed into law their &#8216;Firearms Freedom Act&#8216; while many other states are following suit. The &#8216;Tenth Amendment Center&#8216; has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/04/montana-firearms-freedom-act/comment-page-1/#comment-254234</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=201#comment-254234</guid>
		<description>The House has endorsed it with a 64-36 vote, and the Republican-controlled Senate could pass it easily. Now we just have to get the Governor to get on board</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The House has endorsed it with a 64-36 vote, and the Republican-controlled Senate could pass it easily. Now we just have to get the Governor to get on board</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

