<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foreign Aid Won&#8217;t Save Africa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/04/04/foreign-aid-wont-save-africa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/04/04/foreign-aid-wont-save-africa/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ncdave4life</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/04/04/foreign-aid-wont-save-africa/comment-page-1/#comment-908890</link>
		<dc:creator>ncdave4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/04/04/foreign-aid-wont-save-africa/#comment-908890</guid>
		<description>PEPFAR has saved millions of lives in Africa, and greatly enhanced America&#039;s stature and reputation in the world.

Although there&#039;s no specific provision in the Constitution for foreign aid, as such, there is discussion of the appointment of ambassadors, and broad authority for Congress to create and fill (or delegate the filling of), lower offices, including diplomatic offices.  In the case of ambassadors and other diplomatic personnel, this obviously requires significant expenditures overseas.

Moreover, the USA has a long and continuous record of expending federal money in other countries, for a wide variety of purposes.  For example, in 1795, less than 4 years after the 10th Amendment was ratified, the federal government under George Washinton spent about 1/6-th(!!) of its total budget on an (ultimately unsuccessful) effort to try to buy peace with Algeria!

It seems clear that the Constitution was not intended to cut off the federal government&#039;s ability to do what was always considered to be one the basic and essential functions of a national government, which is to manage relations with other countries, by whatever means seems wise.  That necessarily implies the ability to expend funds overseas on diplomatic initiatives, foreign aid and similar purposes, not just on military adventures, such as the 1801-1805 (undeclared) Barbary War. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PEPFAR has saved millions of lives in Africa, and greatly enhanced America&#8217;s stature and reputation in the world.</p>
<p>Although there&#8217;s no specific provision in the Constitution for foreign aid, as such, there is discussion of the appointment of ambassadors, and broad authority for Congress to create and fill (or delegate the filling of), lower offices, including diplomatic offices.  In the case of ambassadors and other diplomatic personnel, this obviously requires significant expenditures overseas.</p>
<p>Moreover, the USA has a long and continuous record of expending federal money in other countries, for a wide variety of purposes.  For example, in 1795, less than 4 years after the 10th Amendment was ratified, the federal government under George Washinton spent about 1/6-th(!!) of its total budget on an (ultimately unsuccessful) effort to try to buy peace with Algeria!</p>
<p>It seems clear that the Constitution was not intended to cut off the federal government&#8217;s ability to do what was always considered to be one the basic and essential functions of a national government, which is to manage relations with other countries, by whatever means seems wise.  That necessarily implies the ability to expend funds overseas on diplomatic initiatives, foreign aid and similar purposes, not just on military adventures, such as the 1801-1805 (undeclared) Barbary War.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ncdave4life</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/04/04/foreign-aid-wont-save-africa/comment-page-1/#comment-908889</link>
		<dc:creator>ncdave4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/04/04/foreign-aid-wont-save-africa/#comment-908889</guid>
		<description>PEPFAR has saved millions of lives in Africa, and greatly enhanced America&#039;s stature and reputation in the world.

 

Although there&#039;s no specific provision in the Constitution for foreign aid, as such, there is discussion of the appointment of ambassadors, and broad authority for Congress to create and fill (or delegate the filling of), lower offices, including diplomatic offices.  In the case of ambassadors and other diplomatic personnel, this obviously requires significant expenditures overseas.

 

Moreover, the USA has a long and continuous record of expending federal money in other countries, for a wide variety of purposes.  For example, in 1795, less than 4 years after the 10th Amendment was ratified, the federal government under George Washinton spent about 1/6-th(!!) of its total budget on an (ultimately unsuccessful) effort to try to buy peace with Algeria!

 

It seems clear that the Constitution was not intended to cut off the federal government&#039;s ability to do what was always considered to be one the basic and essential functions of a national government, which is to manage relations with other countries, by whatever means seems wise.  That necessarily implies the ability to expend funds overseas on diplomatic initiatives, foreign aid and similar purposes, not just on military adventures, such as the 1801-1805 (undeclared) Barbary War. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PEPFAR has saved millions of lives in Africa, and greatly enhanced America&#8217;s stature and reputation in the world.</p>
<p>Although there&#8217;s no specific provision in the Constitution for foreign aid, as such, there is discussion of the appointment of ambassadors, and broad authority for Congress to create and fill (or delegate the filling of), lower offices, including diplomatic offices.  In the case of ambassadors and other diplomatic personnel, this obviously requires significant expenditures overseas.</p>
<p>Moreover, the USA has a long and continuous record of expending federal money in other countries, for a wide variety of purposes.  For example, in 1795, less than 4 years after the 10th Amendment was ratified, the federal government under George Washinton spent about 1/6-th(!!) of its total budget on an (ultimately unsuccessful) effort to try to buy peace with Algeria!</p>
<p>It seems clear that the Constitution was not intended to cut off the federal government&#8217;s ability to do what was always considered to be one the basic and essential functions of a national government, which is to manage relations with other countries, by whatever means seems wise.  That necessarily implies the ability to expend funds overseas on diplomatic initiatives, foreign aid and similar purposes, not just on military adventures, such as the 1801-1805 (undeclared) Barbary War.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ncdave4life</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/04/04/foreign-aid-wont-save-africa/comment-page-1/#comment-908888</link>
		<dc:creator>ncdave4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/04/04/foreign-aid-wont-save-africa/#comment-908888</guid>
		<description>PEPFAR has saved millions of lives in Africa, and greatly enhanced America&#039;s stature and reputation in the world.Although there&#039;s no specific provision in the Constitution for foreign aid, as such, there is discussion of the appointment of ambassadors, and broad authority for Congress to create and fill (or delegate the filling of), lower offices, including diplomatic offices.  In the case of ambassadors and other diplomatic personnel, this obviously requires significant expenditures overseas.Moreover, the USA has a long and continuous record of expending federal money in other countries, for a wide variety of purposes.  For example, in 1795, less than 4 years after the 10th Amendment was ratified, the federal government under George Washinton spent about 1/6-th(!!) of its total budget on an (ultimately unsuccessful) effort to try to buy peace with Algeria!It seems clear that the Constitution was not intended to cut off the federal government&#039;s ability to do what was always considered to be one the basic and essential functions of a national government, which is to manage relations with other countries, by whatever means seems wise.  That necessarily implies the ability to expend funds overseas on diplomatic initiatives, foreign aid and similar purposes, not just on military adventures, such as the 1801-1805 (undeclared) Barbary War. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PEPFAR has saved millions of lives in Africa, and greatly enhanced America&#8217;s stature and reputation in the world.Although there&#8217;s no specific provision in the Constitution for foreign aid, as such, there is discussion of the appointment of ambassadors, and broad authority for Congress to create and fill (or delegate the filling of), lower offices, including diplomatic offices.  In the case of ambassadors and other diplomatic personnel, this obviously requires significant expenditures overseas.Moreover, the USA has a long and continuous record of expending federal money in other countries, for a wide variety of purposes.  For example, in 1795, less than 4 years after the 10th Amendment was ratified, the federal government under George Washinton spent about 1/6-th(!!) of its total budget on an (ultimately unsuccessful) effort to try to buy peace with Algeria!It seems clear that the Constitution was not intended to cut off the federal government&#8217;s ability to do what was always considered to be one the basic and essential functions of a national government, which is to manage relations with other countries, by whatever means seems wise.  That necessarily implies the ability to expend funds overseas on diplomatic initiatives, foreign aid and similar purposes, not just on military adventures, such as the 1801-1805 (undeclared) Barbary War.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Dying Uncle vs. Ron Paul: A Public Health Disaster in the Works &#171; Freewheel Burning</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/04/04/foreign-aid-wont-save-africa/comment-page-1/#comment-907194</link>
		<dc:creator>My Dying Uncle vs. Ron Paul: A Public Health Disaster in the Works &#171; Freewheel Burning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/04/04/foreign-aid-wont-save-africa/#comment-907194</guid>
		<description>[...] HIV medications for more than 1.2 million people in Africa. Paul believes the private sector should provide these funds and made all kinds of grand predictions about PEPFAR that didn&#8217;t come true. Here&#8217;s Paul [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HIV medications for more than 1.2 million people in Africa. Paul believes the private sector should provide these funds and made all kinds of grand predictions about PEPFAR that didn&#8217;t come true. Here&#8217;s Paul [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Madness of Ron Paul &#124; Ron Paul</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/04/04/foreign-aid-wont-save-africa/comment-page-1/#comment-906816</link>
		<dc:creator>The Madness of Ron Paul &#124; Ron Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 11:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/04/04/foreign-aid-wont-save-africa/#comment-906816</guid>
		<description>[...] including George W. Bush, Jr., who actually expanded the funding of PEPFAR. In fact, Paul wrote an article for the radical &#8220;Tenth Amendment Center&#8221; in which he shrilly asserted that PEPFAR is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] including George W. Bush, Jr., who actually expanded the funding of PEPFAR. In fact, Paul wrote an article for the radical &#8220;Tenth Amendment Center&#8221; in which he shrilly asserted that PEPFAR is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obbop</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/04/04/foreign-aid-wont-save-africa/comment-page-1/#comment-82640</link>
		<dc:creator>Obbop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 23:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/04/04/foreign-aid-wont-save-africa/#comment-82640</guid>
		<description>Studies have shown that much of the foreign aid is intercepted by the ruling elites of the receiving country.

Thus, foreign aid is merely America&#039;s elites helping out their bretheren, other elites in other countries.

This has been going on throughout history.

Meanwhile, the common people are spat upon as the elite class skims off wealth from the common peole whose labors actually create wealth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Studies have shown that much of the foreign aid is intercepted by the ruling elites of the receiving country.</p>
<p>Thus, foreign aid is merely America&#8217;s elites helping out their bretheren, other elites in other countries.</p>
<p>This has been going on throughout history.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the common people are spat upon as the elite class skims off wealth from the common peole whose labors actually create wealth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

