<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding War Powers: Declare vs. Wage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/05/21/understanding-war-powers-declare-vs-wage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/05/21/understanding-war-powers-declare-vs-wage/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:19:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Byron</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/05/21/understanding-war-powers-declare-vs-wage/comment-page-1/#comment-98106</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/05/18/understanding-war-powers-declare-vs-wage/#comment-98106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You need to cite primary authority.  The Supreme Court is the primary authority for these issues, not quotes from founding fathers.  The non-delegation has largely been abandoned--meaning congress can delegate its powers.  In Mistretta v. U.S.,  Congress was allowed to charge the US Sentencing Commission (the Executive) with developing sentencing guidelines to assure greater predictability and uniformity because Congress set forth clear goals, sentence maximums, a starting point, and seven specific factors to consider. The test after this case became something like this: Delegation will be struck down only when there is an absence of standards so that it would be impossible to ascertain whether the will of Congress has been obeyed. Congress must provide an &quot;intelligible principle&quot;.  
Additionally, in Whitman v. American Trucking Association, Congress was allowed to delegate power to EPA (also the Executive) to set standards for clean air because the standard was sufficiently clear: â€œrequisite to protect the public health,â€ which the court interpreted to mean â€œnot lower or higher than is necessary to protect the public health with an adequate margin of safety.â€ This recent case shows that the Court is not inclined to strike down delegated power even when the language is broad. Essentially, whenever Congress chooses to acquiesce, the delegation will pass the test as long as congress keeps some control on the extent and parameters of the delegation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to cite primary authority.  The Supreme Court is the primary authority for these issues, not quotes from founding fathers.  The non-delegation has largely been abandoned&#8211;meaning congress can delegate its powers.  In Mistretta v. U.S.,  Congress was allowed to charge the US Sentencing Commission (the Executive) with developing sentencing guidelines to assure greater predictability and uniformity because Congress set forth clear goals, sentence maximums, a starting point, and seven specific factors to consider. The test after this case became something like this: Delegation will be struck down only when there is an absence of standards so that it would be impossible to ascertain whether the will of Congress has been obeyed. Congress must provide an &#8220;intelligible principle&#8221;.<br />
Additionally, in Whitman v. American Trucking Association, Congress was allowed to delegate power to EPA (also the Executive) to set standards for clean air because the standard was sufficiently clear: â€œrequisite to protect the public health,â€ which the court interpreted to mean â€œnot lower or higher than is necessary to protect the public health with an adequate margin of safety.â€ This recent case shows that the Court is not inclined to strike down delegated power even when the language is broad. Essentially, whenever Congress chooses to acquiesce, the delegation will pass the test as long as congress keeps some control on the extent and parameters of the delegation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iran: Avoiding the Real Questions Â» Tenth Amendment Center</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/05/21/understanding-war-powers-declare-vs-wage/comment-page-1/#comment-35642</link>
		<dc:creator>Iran: Avoiding the Real Questions Â» Tenth Amendment Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/05/18/understanding-war-powers-declare-vs-wage/#comment-35642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] So what happens after that? It seems pretty obvious in the age of the &#8220;war on terror&#8221; doesn&#8217;t it? I, like many others, can&#8217;t help but expect this to end up in yet another, undeclared, unconstitutional war. (see overviews of war powers and the constitution here, here and here) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So what happens after that? It seems pretty obvious in the age of the &#8220;war on terror&#8221; doesn&#8217;t it? I, like many others, can&#8217;t help but expect this to end up in yet another, undeclared, unconstitutional war. (see overviews of war powers and the constitution here, here and here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dar</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/05/21/understanding-war-powers-declare-vs-wage/comment-page-1/#comment-6793</link>
		<dc:creator>Dar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 02:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/05/18/understanding-war-powers-declare-vs-wage/#comment-6793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is one small (and maybe key) step in restoring correct war powers:

     http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst052107.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is one small (and maybe key) step in restoring correct war powers:</p>
<p>     <a href="http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst052107.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst052107.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Politics: 2008 HQ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Understanding War Powers: Declare vs. Wage</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/05/21/understanding-war-powers-declare-vs-wage/comment-page-1/#comment-6121</link>
		<dc:creator>Politics: 2008 HQ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Understanding War Powers: Declare vs. Wage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 22:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/05/18/understanding-war-powers-declare-vs-wage/#comment-6121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Original post by Tenth Amendment [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Tenth Amendment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
